Long time cinephile and observer of exhibition
patterns Bruce Hodsdon has just (Friday 7 April) posted this note on my Facebook page in
response to my link to a
piece on the Film Alert blog advising that the Brisbane Asia Pacific Film
Festival has been finished up and will be no more. Bruce wrote: As I understand it The Brisbane
international Film festival from its beginnings in the early nineties had a
brief from the Goss Government to give special emphasis to Asian cinema
something which Anne Demy-Geroe also had a personal commitment right through
the nearly two decades she was artistic director. In my observation and with
some awareness of the comparative attendance statistics festival audiences were
not very responsive, a situation that seems to have continued with the BAPFF
although it was awkwardly locked into the November dates far from an ideal time
for a FF in Brisbane.
So there we are, a succinct summary of where we
came from with BIFF and ended this week with BAPFF. BIFF and BAPFF had more
than one problem but their biggest was that they simply didn’t attract people
to their programs. Most especially they didn’t attract crowds to their
specialty of films from Asia. There were few successes in that group.
So, to put the argument in context let me give you
what I understand are some relevant if approximate statistics. I think Bruce
keeps better numbers than these but try them for size. The annual film festival
in Wellington New Zealand sells well over 70,000 tickets to a loyal and curious
audience built up over decades of efficient management and quality marketing.
The annual film festival in Vancouver Canada sells approximately 150,000
tickets to a loyal supporter base that has been nurtured over several decades. Brisbane
has a population of just over two million, The Greater Vancouver area (Metropolitan
Vancouver) had a population of about 2.5 million. Wellington has a population
of just over 200,00.
The
best attendance ever achieved by BIFF was approximately 25,000 admissions.
I
have a lot of difficulty finding any significant demographic difference between
the three cities that would explain why Wellington and Vancouver can run events
that attract much greater attendance than Brisbane.
That
shortfall in bums on seats was always the major problem with events, however
named, that cost a lot to present and represented a massive per person ticket
subsidy especially when compared with the other major city film festivals in
Australia. No doubt over a long time this caused the funding bodies to look
askance at just how much the event was costing and what the ‘return’ was.
Bean
counters are not wildly interested in cultural values. Unfortunately those
interested in pursuing cultural values have to be interested in bean counting.
So what are Brisbane-ites and Queenslanders left with. Variety
reports a statement by the Chairman of the Asia-Pacific Screen Awards as
follows: Michael
Hawkins executive chairman of APSA, says that the current moves reflect
confusion between the brands. “At first, (holding the two simultaneously)
seemed such a great idea – APSA having an international face and BAPFF being
the local engagement. But as time progressed, the two became confused and
somewhat melded. APSA started as, and was intended to be, a stand-alone awards
ceremony, quite unique in the region,” Hawkins told Variety.
“We have now taken the screenings of the APSA films out of
a once-a-year event, and will make them more accessible by having curated
programs crafted for other established events and festivals that are consistent
with the geographic region we seek to represent. Added to food, fashion, music
and other forms of entertainment, I am confident we will deliver a superior
product for the enjoyment of all. A great example is a screening we did of a
Japanese film in conjunction with the BrisAsia Festival – 2,500 people attended
an outdoor screening.
“We will
maintain the four day APSA program, during which we will curate a special
program around visiting film makers, be they nominees or APSA jurors, and
whether new features or documentaries, or retrospective streams. So far from
being for the cultural elite, the APSA Screenings will be more accessible for
all, and in conjunction with a great many varied and related activities.”
More
to come. Check back
There was a quite lively Brisbane Film Festival in the sixties which the current cycle never acknowledges.
ReplyDeleteWhat was the reason that anyone thought that Brisbane would support either kind of film festival? What commitment to those ideals did Brisbane ever show, before? Seriously, can anyone say? Government money will buy you an event, but not a supporter base.
ReplyDelete