Showing posts with label Catherine Breillat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catherine Breillat. Show all posts

Saturday, 23 May 2026

At CINEMA REBORN - Beaudicea Smith-Davies' introduction to the Sydney screening of 36 FILLETTE (Catherine Breillat, France, 1988)

Beaudicea Smith-Davies is a PhD candidate at the University of Sydney. Her research focuses on monstrosity in the works of contemporary French female filmmakers. This is a slightly edited transcript of her introduction to the screening of 36 Fillette during the Sydney season of Cinema Reborn 2026.


This is the fifth transcript of an introduction to a program in the Cinema Reborn 2026 season. Previous introductions published by Margot Nash on the Australian Social Realism program,  CJ Johnson on One Hour with You, Barrie Pattison on The Watchmaker of Saint-Paul and David Heslin on The Asthenic Syndrome can be found if you click on the author's names.

 

**************************************

 

Catherine Breillat 

36 Fillette 
(1998) is Catherine Breillat’s 3rd film and was inspired by her novel of the same name. The untranslated title refers to the European dress size ‘36’ and ‘fillette’ means little girl: the equivalent of an Australian XS or calling someone ‘petite’. Breillat was born in 1948 in the provincial town of Bressuire near the city of Niort in north west France. As a teenager, she spent many of her summer holidays with her older sister on the south west coast, hitchhiking to bars and nightclubs in Biarritz, where this film is set. When it was first released in 1988 it was not a hit in France, but it proved popular with audiences in the US where it was billed as the French Lolita likely due to its focus on a relationship between a teenage girl and an older man. Breillat’s 14-year-old protagonist Lili is played by Delphine Zentout, who was 16 at the time the film was shot, and the relationship between her and Maurice, played by Etienne Chicot, is largely told from her point of view.  Her quest to use the summer to lose her virginity is the driving force behind the story.

 

At the beginning of her career, the teenage girl’s journey of self-discovery, her desire to explore her body and sexuality on her own terms as she morphs into a woman, arose as a central concern of Breillat’s work.  At 17, she wrote her first novel ‘The easy man’, L’homme facile (1968). A work of erotic fiction about the sexual awakening of a teenage girl. Her first film, ‘A real young girl’, Une vraie jeune fille (1975), explores this same theme. While teenage girl characters were already present in French cinema such as the teenage sisters in Eric Rohmer’s ‘Claire’s Knee’, Le genou de Claire (1970), and Claude Miller’s ‘The Impudent Girl’, L’effrontée(1985), starring a 14 year old Charlotte Gainsbourg, Breillat’s vision is neither festishing like Rohmers nor paternalistc like Millers but honest, and female — a rarity for its time. The metamorphosis of bodies, especially female bodies, Breillat films without ceremony and the gaze her camera produces is as direct and unscrupulous as her dialogues.

 

Lili (Delphine Zentout), 36 Fillette

Even though she is often thought of as a feminist filmmaker with a specific female or feminine gaze, when speaking about her manner of filming bodies and sex, she insists on the authority that being a ‘metteur en scène’, a film director, grants her. She says: 
‘nothing must be censored[...] the director avoids filming what they don’t want to see and we see exactly what they want to see[...] this is what I call a ‘gaze’. The gaze is placed where the director wants[...] and nowhere else[...] and it’s there that the audience is going to look [...] and nowhere else.’ Sometimes considered provocative or shocking, Breillat offers an alternative to society’s moralising gaze and a refusal of puritanical censoring of what can be projected on the big screen. In her home country, audiences and critics only started taking an interest in Breillat’s cinema after the commercial success of her 1999 film Romance, which includes a scene of unsimulated fellatio and the casting of male porn star Rocco Seffredi. Rather than an anomaly, Romance situates itself within a broader movement of films that at the time flirted with the border between art cinema and pornography — Vincent Gallo’s Brown Bunny (2003) and Virginie Despentes’ Baise-moi (2000), loosely translated as ‘screw-me’, are two examples of this. 

 

J-P (Stéphane Moquet), Lili (Delphine Zentout)

Generally better known for her cinema, Breillat has since the start of her career always engaged with literary writing; many of her films are adapted from her written work or her films have provided the subject matter for her books. Representations of women’s lives dominate her body of work, of which a large portion is either semi-biographical, as is the case of 36 Fillette or entirely autobiographical. Like Breillat, our protagonist Lili, is precocious, aspires to be a writer, has outgrown her peers and is ready to burst through the tight seams of a world already too small to contain her. Still an adolescent herself when she first entered the French literary scene there is an apparent parallel between Breillat’s personal experiences and those of the fictional female protagonists she represents, and Breillat frequently acknowledges the translation of her own life into her work.Today 36 Fillette (1987) the novel is currently out of print, although in France, several of her novels are readily available. Her well-known text Pornocratie (2001) was translated into English in 2008, and includes an introduction by American writer Chris Kraus, and a very recent book, published in the form of a series of interviews with Breillat, ‘I only believe in myself’, Je ne crois qu’en moi (2023), appears in English as well. 

 

Lili (Delphine Zentout), Maurice (Etienne Chicot

After suffering a stroke in 2004, Breillat experienced a form of renaissance, in France anyway. Her stroke left her hemiplegic, and she published a book ‘Abuse of Weakness’ Abus de faiblesse (2009), which she adapted to film in 2013, about how she was swindled out of a fortune by a conman in the immediate period of her recovery.  Breillat’s highly publicised personal tragedy transformed public perceptions and ignited renewed interest in her as an artist. It prompted a return to her earlier, more avant-gardist works, such as the case for 36 Fillette.

 

The biographical impulse behind much of her work is evidence of a creative process that arises from a place of intimate personal experience, and throughout her career Breillat has written, filmed, re-written and reimagined what she knows constantly returning and revisiting bodies, sex, desire and intimacy. At the same time her stories move beyond the personal realm and extend to the universal. ‘Blue Beard’, Barbe Bleue (2009), and ‘Sleeping Beauty’, La Belle Endormie (2010), two films from her mid-career are reimaginings of Charles Perrault’s classical fairytales. 

 

Like Breillat’s films, Perrault’s tales were never intended for children. We know that he wrote them to prove to his peers at the academy that the popular tales of the common folk contained some of humanity’s oldest myths. Her most recent film ‘Last summer’, L’été dernier (2023), returns to relationship depicted in 36 Fillette, where a woman has a romantic relationship with her teenage stepson performing a gendered inversion of the dynamic we see between Lili and Maurice. ‘Last Summer’ is itself a remake of Danish film ‘Queen of Hearts’, Dronningen (May el-Toukhy, 2019), and Breillat self-consciously includes a reference to Hans Christen Anderson’s ‘The Little Mermaid’, acknowledging her film’s Danish roots. 

 

Lili (Delphine Zentout), Bertrand (Olivier Parnière)


36 Fillette
 equally reaches into the wondrous when Lili leads Maurice to a beach that takes its name from a local legend, a tale that itself recalls the tragic drowning of forbidden lovers Hero and Leander from Greek mythology. 40 years on from its first screening, Lili and her creator continue as forces to be reckoned with, and the film still feels as bold and incisive today in the wake of contemporary debates. Watching Breillat’s films, I find, can sometimes feel like trying to dry swallow a pill and staking a bet that the immediate discomfort will eventually give way to an enlightened sense of relief. I hope you enjoy the film! 

Thursday, 19 March 2026

CINEMA REBORN - CLASSIC FRENCH CINEMA - PORT OF SHADOWS (1938), THE WATCHMAKER OF SAINT PAUL (1974), 36 FILLETTE (1988)


The 2026 program includes three remarkable films from three classic periods of French Cinema.

Port of Shadows | Current | The Criterion Collection

PORT OF SHADOWS (Marcel Carné, 1938) is an early film from the master film-maker best known for the wartime masterpiece Les Enfants du Paradis (1945). In his notes for the film published on the Cinema Reborn website critic Charles Carrall writes: “In his third feature-length film Port of Shadows (Le quai des brumes, 1938), an early masterpiece for Carné, the port city of Le Havre is shrouded in a serious fog. …As one of seven works in his celebrated partnership with screenwriter Jacques Prévert, Carné’s Port of Shadows, based on a Pierre Mac Orlan novel, stands out for its remarkable atmosphere of doom and gloom.

‘A remarkably beautiful motion picture.’ – Frank S. Nugent, The New York Times

The link to Charles’ notes takes you through to bookings and session times in Sydney and Melbourne. Screens twice in each city.

Introduced by Bruce Beresford at Ritz Cinemas and Dr. Felicity Chaplin at Lido Cinemas.

The Watchmaker of Saint-Paul (1974) - Ritz Cinemas

THE WATCHMAKER OF SAINT PAUL (Bertrand Tavernier, 1974)

‘An extraordinary film – the more so because it attempts to show us the very complicated workings of the human personality, and to do it with grace, some humour and a great deal of style.’ – Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

In Bertrand Tavernier’s feature directorial debut, adapted from a Georges Simenon novel, the quiet, orderly life of a widowed watchmaker (Philippe Noiret) is blown apart by the revelation that his teenage son has gone on the run after killing a man. Forming a relationship with a sympathetic police inspector (Jean Rochefort), the watchmaker searches for answers and grapples with the realisation that he knows far less about his son than he believed.

Introduced by Barrie Pattison at Ritz Cinemas and Dr. Andrew McGregor at Lido Cinemas

Read Ben McCann’s program notes and find links to session times and bookings. Screens twice in each city.

Virgin (1988) - IMDb

36 FILLETTE (Catherine Breillat, 1988)

‘Impressive, painfully candid … Lili is played with devastating realism by Delphine Zentout.’ – David Stratton, The Movie Show

Featuring a key supporting role by French New Wave legend Jean-Pierre Léaud, Catherine Breillat’s international breakthrough film – based on a novel she wrote about her own teenage experiences – was controversial in its day, and time has if anything only increased its transgressive charge. It remains a frank, unsentimental and singularly pungent depiction of feminine coming-of-age, anchored by Zentout’s fearless performance.

Introduced by Beaudicea Smith-Davies at Ritz Cinemas and Philippa Hawker at Lido Cinemas.

Read Jane Mills program notes and find links to session times and bookings. Screens once only in each city.


CHARITABLE DONATIONS

Since our inception supporters have continued to ensure that the annual season is able to present the very latest and very best international and Australian film restorations.

Tax deductible charitable donations have enabled us to keep our admission charges to regular Ritz and Lido prices (with the lowest student concessions of any similar film-related event). We have once again set up a page via the Australian Cultural Fund to receive donations of any size, large or small. You can find it IF YOU CLICK ON THIS LINK

More news soon…

Monday, 21 August 2023

Melbourne International Film Festival - Sydney's supercinephile Barrie Pattison ventures south to discover old films by Dario Argento and new films Marco Bellocchio, Catherine Breillat and more.

Editor's Note: The Dario Argento Retrospective reviewed below is also screening weekly on Thursday nights at 7.00 pm at the Randwick Ritz beginning on Thursday 24 August. The Ritz is screening eighteen Argento titles (cf twelve screened at MIFF). Details of the Ritz season, times, dates, bookings etc, which is presented in association with the Italian Institute of Culture, Sydney, may be found IF YOU CLICK HERE

************************

Visiting Melbourne for the first time after the pandemic was revealing, an unwelcome reminder of how far Sydney is falling behind with movies. They still have their Chinatown Twin, ACMI’s pretend Cinémathèque and their IMAX theatre which was playing Oppenheimer in the format said to be unique in the Southern Hemisphere. Not only did they have the venues but an audience which would fill them up. Breaks your heart really.


The incentive was the Melbourne International Film Festival, which had some of the material I’d missed in Sydney and a Dario Argento (above) retrospective.  That one was a reminder of researching “The Seal of Dracula” in the days of Paul Naschy, Hitchcock rip-offs, Phantom of the Paradise and the European Fantastic Film Festivals. 

Time was Argento was my favorite filmmaker. I once found myself with a single night in Paris and three hundred plus films to choose from. Agonising! I was still under the spell of Suspiria, which had revealed Argento as the Federico Fellini of the splatter film and was banned in Australia while the rights were held by an independent distributor. Three weeks after the rights passed to Fox, it would open with a twenty second censor cut.  But that is another story.

Deep Red

I elected for Argento’s Profondo Rosso/ Deep Red, the film he made before that. Good choice as it turned out, probably his best work - a mix of sensation and style that was right on my wavelength. That and Suspiria were in the MIFF season. Not always easy to find, the director’s other works generally fail to match those peaks but they are all recognisably from the same hands. In addition, the MIFF showings came via the Instituto Italiano di cultura which meant modern restorations - not always a good thing  but no faded, cut and worn film prints, along with original Italian language sound and English subtitles.

The tracks were an interesting study in themselves. On show, Argento’s second film, the 1971  Il gatto a nove code/Cat O' Nine Tails belongs to the hundred percent post synch era of Italian film and is particularly distracting - we open with Sergio Graziani’s Italian-speaking voice issuing from a blue-eyed Karl Malden’s lips. James Franciscus is better voiced by long-time dubbing actor Pino Colizzi. The lack of background ambiance is obvious, with only odd footsteps and vehicles added in. It’s early days for Morricone but his score has to do the heavy lifting.  

Karl Malden, James Franciscus, Cat of Nine Tails

Nine Tails 
was the one that gave Argento his least satisfaction. It opens promisingly with blind man Malden out walking on the street with his young niece Cinzia De Carolis, in front of the suburban Terzi Institute for Biological Intelligence. He overhears a suspicious conversation from a parked car (his enhanced hearing is a plot point) & has the girl describe the men in the vehicle they have just passed.

Being Argento Giallo, there’s a sinister figure break-in at the institute, where they can’t work out what’s been taken, and murders accumulate. Carlo Alighiero, one of their scientists, is shoved off a Metro platform to be cut in half by a train. The police now interview the Institute personnel (suspects!) including Terzi Director Tino Carraro’s glamorous daughter Catharine Spaak, in ridiculous fetishistic outfits. She and Franciscus make out but that doesn’t go well when James becomes suspicious about her reluctance to drink from the tetrahedron milk packs the villain has poisoned with a hypodermic - customary Hitchcock reference. Malden heard Spaak fingering the gold watch chain round her neck and deduces that the incriminating information in her medallion has been missed by the police, before her garrotted body was buried with it in the family vault.

Turns out that what was stolen was a file with the chromosome structure of one of the board, showing the homicidal tendencies the institute is studying cf. the 1952 British The Brain Machine. The charts on the institute walls resemble Malden’s Braille puzzle table - Argento conspicuous decoration like Spaak’s squid pattern wallpaper.  

The murderer abducts Malden’s niece and ties her up in a rat-infested room, so the amateur investigator duo appoint themselves tomb robbers and break into the Terzi mausoleum. We get the already characteristic sequence when Franciscus finds himself locked in with his burglar kit inadequate to secure his escape, till the door opens to show Malden with blood dripping off his white stick, which proves to be a sword cane.

The rooftop chase finale is an anti-climax after this, though hands gripping the lift cables got a great yuk reaction from the audience.

Adriano Celentano, The Five Days

MIFF also aired Argento’s next film Le cinque giornate/The Five Days/The Five Days of Milan declaring it an Australian premiere, which is a bit of a liberty. I saw it several times when it was a staple of the Italian language circuit in the seventies, presumably playing to the immense following of Singer Star TV personality Adriano Celantano. (they say his on-air recommendation was instrumental in returning Berlusconi) He makes an uncharacteristically glum lead here.

A historical spectacle set against the 1848 Milan rising against the Austrian occupation, where Adriano has been jailed. A cannonball breaching the prison wall sets him free. He finds himself partnering with baker Enzo Cerusico in a series of disturbing adventures - conscripted into the dotty, murderous militia, assisting at a child birth and finding that even with the power shift they are still at the bottom of the social order. This was the first time I heard the phrase “Siamo fregata!”

The Five Days is not altogether well served by Argento’s taste for the weird and grisly - a lot of close-up bayonetting and blasting point-blank with early firearms. The final killing of the German, seen only as yellow hair thrown up in slow motion, as he is shot in front of his young mistress, comes with the eerie search of the degenerate’s house by the looting pair, that’s getting closer to Fellini. 

These striking images are coaxed out of a limited budget and there are attempts at
innovation, like playing only the sound of the baby over the cavalry charge. Marilu
Tolo does another of her vigorous, sexy turns here. Dario’s producer dad had set up The Five Days for Nanni Loy, in the wake of his imposing 1962 The Four Days of
Naples
. Apparently unsuccessful, The Five Days was eventually director, the younger Argento’s, one departure from his giallos

The MIFF dozen film line-up also included Argento’s debut The Bird with the Crystal Plumage, his 1971 Four Flies on Grey Velvet with Hollywood starlet Mimsy Farmer become sex sensation after displaying her new nose in Barbet Schroder’s More, 1971’s Deep Red , Suspiria 1977, Tenebrae (1982) offering Anthony Franciosa menaced by straight razors, Phenomena (1985) which puts a teenage Jenifer Connolly in the path of a serial killer, The Black Cat from the two part TV Two Evil Eyes (1990), Opera where Palma’s Phantom allies with killer ravens, a 1998 Phantom of the Opera with Julian Sands having sex with rats. While not complete (none of his imposing pre-director scripts were on show) this selection was extensive enough to confirm the impression of  sex, style and violence which made his work attention getting but finally limited.

Do You Like  Hitchcock?00

One I hadn’t previously been able to see, despite my best efforts and a European retrospective, was Argento’s 2005’s Ti piace Hitchcock?/Do You Like Hitchcock?, the first entry in a TV Hitchcock-themed series. The reduced budget shows mainly in having Elio Germani the only familiar face, in an Argento film without an imported star. The technicians are A-feature guys including musician Pino Donaggio.

Here we get giallo black gloves that don’t leave prints, La finestra di fronte, delito per delito like Strangers on a Train. The Hitchcock citations also run to extreme close-ups - the lift mechanism locking, the close-up of the lit cigarette end, the keys in the tumbler.

In this one, then young Germani is a film student, the sole example in movies who takes notes, even if he uses a wide-screen TV that crops Der Golem. He’s also a voyeur, watching the action in the downstairs flat from his windows. Of course, he sees a murder there.

He falls out with fetching lady friend Cristina Brondo (the one featured female not to go topless in this one) who deserts his bed, with him dumping her effects into the street bin where the bag lady scoops them into her shopping trolley. Elio sets out to investigate. He steals the victim’s bank statement, revealing a million lire inheritance and gets into the crime scene, when the char lady is busy mopping up the blood. Her supervisor buys Elio’s claim to be a reporter (again) and wants to know which paper he’ll be able to read his own name in.

When our hero is left in charge of the neighbourhood video shop, a large poster of Argento’s Il cartaio/The Card Player is prominent. Elio gets into the store computer to find the details of blonde downstairs tenant Chiara Conti, just as she comes in, with some scrambling to clear the screen before she sees her own details there. Her showing interest in her cute neighbor upsets proprietor-admirer Iván Morales.

Determined to penetrate the imbroglio, Germani hops on his moped to follow Conti’s car to work and, using his binoculars, sees her being groped by her bald realtor boss. Here the growing storm sounds are effective, as we get to the Argento set piece. Germani climbs the plants on the building where the lowlife takes the girl and is spotted, falling and injuring his knee. Unchaining the moped, which he has to side saddle,  he flees the vengeful boss through belting rain.

In full Rear Window mode, Brondo comes back to care for Germani, his leg in plaster. Plausibility takes a pounding with an attempt to add two more climaxes - a graphic near drowning and the black hoody he saw through his peephole door re-appearing, putting Brondo in jeopardy. 

It doesn’t really matter who the killer is and the nudity is gratuitous but Argento has clearly hit his stride by this one. MIFF has a history of adventurous Cinémathèque quality retrospectives - Tomu Uchida and Jean Epstein! Add Argento to their welcome break from endless Ozu and Bergman.

Short films, often a strength of these, were disappointing this time out but the event was a chance to pick up on films I’d missed in the Sydney festival.


Intriguingly one (the one?) survivor, from the days of cinema reverence and cult status for the Godards and Bergmans, is Marco Bellocchio (above), who at age eighty-three has offered what may be his best work, the new Rapito/Kidnapped, a film with ferocious anti-Catholicism (compare the director’s 1971 Nel nome del padre) which would have made it unscreenable through a large part of its director’s life - and mine. Bellocchio’s work has not always been readily available, with a wide range of subject matter and style. The films which seem to have proved most acceptable to distribution chains tend to be his intense Italian History pieces like the 2009 Mussolini film Vincere and the 2003 Aldo Moro  Buongiorno, notte/Good Morning Night but those were set closer to our own time.

This one takes place during the unification of  Italy and is played in painting-like compositions of costumed performers in historic settings, filmed without fill light so that the story seems to be engulfed in the shadows of history.

In 1857 Bologna, the constables come for Enea Sala, the six-year-old son of a rich Jewish family, claiming that his secret baptism makes him eternally a Christian, who must be removed from their control. No question of balancing here. The Jews are uniformly noble in bearing the persecutions visited upon them by Catholics, who are uniformly malicious whether through conviction or convenience. “Worse than the Pharoah” the boy’s mother, Barbara Ronchi says of Inquisitor Fabrizio Gifuni.

Young Sala is transferred to the Vatican and the company of a number of other reclaimed children, who coach him into going along with the gag to facilitate his return to his family, though he still repeats the Scherma Israel each night. Paolo Pierobon’s Pope Pius makes a personal project of the boys, while Fausto Russo Alesi the father, always in forced deference, pleads for his release. The mechanics of this campaign generates the film’s suspense and its interest. We wait for the factions invoked to act - the Rothschilds, who hold Vatican debts large enough to destroy the Church, worldwide opinion mobilised by the press to the point of possible intervention. In the face-to-face meeting between Pierobon and Alesi, the Pontiff is enraged that even the Catholic papers have been approached to urge the father’s case.

The boy’s brainwashing proceeds with two vivid lapses. The first, where Ronchi has been granted a visit and her son acts with instructed composure only to rush back to his mother’s arms as the emotion becomes too strong. Approaching the film’s end, the character, now played by Leonardo Maltese, from the Amelio 2022 Il signore delle formiche/Lord of the Ants, is part of the Pope’s funeral cortege on the way to his tomb when the mob surges over them screaming “Throw the pig in the Tiber” a chant into which he finds himself drawn.

These bursts of hysterics are uncharacteristic of the film’s grim, measured content, which includes now trainee priest Maltese called upon to use his tongue to inscribe the sign of the cross on the marble floor three times to atone to Pierobon. We also get the aging Pope’s vision of the newspaper cartoon of Jewish invaders circumcising him come to life and the scene of a wooden Jesus descending from the cross - second time this week - after The New Boy.

With the 1870 loss of the Papal states to Risorgimento troops with feathers in their hats, who break down the walls to rescue Maltese, inquisitor Gifuni is put on trial providing the film’s most intriguing and unique material, as details of the abduction and it’s likely bogus basis are tested in court.

It’s rare to find a film, where issues are central, holding attention so well. Most of the cast have been around for years without drawing our attention, which gives them the double value of experience and a lack of previous associations. They and the technicians are on top of their game. The viewer’s own belief structure is likely to fog any message content but it can’t be a bad thing to put a  work of such intense scrutiny into circulation.


Back again after a decade, L'été dernier/Last Summer looks a vintage offering from Catherine Breillat (above), once poster lady for transgressive film. We get elegant lawyer Léa Drucker briefing a teenage girl rape victim on the rough spots she faces in her legal action. This suggests the creator of 36 Fillette Blue Beard is going to deliver a smart, in character social drama. However before long, we find we’re in for a retread of Phaedra, via a Danish 2019 Trine Dyrholme movie.

We learn about childless Drucker, victim of a youthful misadventure, now in a super respectable marriage with Olivier Rabourdin, that runs to an explicit make-out scene. The pair have adopted two young Asian girls. However, Rabourdin’s teenage son by his first marriage, Samuel Kircher, is already having brushes with the law. A laboured bit of business with the kids’ keychain gift establishes his guilt in a break-in at the family home.

Léa warns him to shape up or else and that goes implausibly well, with Sam swimming with the girls on a picnic and doubling Léa on his motor scooter away from the boring gathering (OK extended traveling shot) to the livelier surroundings of a local boite. It’s not long before the two get into a sustained double close-up lip lock and a bit of “No, we shouldn’t.” They represent the contrast of the Pill Generation and the AIDs Generation. Developments like sister Clotilde Coreau catching the guilty couple or Kircher’s illicit dictaphone recordings, don’t go anywhere interesting.

On his time out together with dad Rabourdin, the kid dobs Léa in and the best the movie can come up with is Léa po faced denying it. They go to court, with her getting the kind of legal bruising that we’ve seen her describe, and paying out big.

The marriage survives and she’s back naked in the sack with Rabourdin, when the doorbell rings and Kircher is downstairs drunk...

Neither the cast or the handling are able to generate conviction and this one has to be rated a disappointment.

Art College 1994 

Jian Lu’s unexpected Chinese feature cartoon Art College 1994 is off-putting at first, with its literal, shading-free visuals and lip-synch characters.  The opening with the cartoon beetle failing to climb a wall suggests an imagery which will only dot the work - a butterfly, an insect on a diner plate, a distant flying crane.  What this one foregrounds is student characters lost in the familiar confusion of demanding what is art - Marcel Duchamp’s urinal, Andy Warhol, is the moon more beautiful than a board? One dissatisfied boy burns his drawings to be copied by another hailing it as an aesthetic statement. “Is it art because I say so?”  - all here amplified by China’s uneasy entry into the Market Economy, which introduces engulfing Western ideas, in streets dotted with Golden Arches and Superman the Movie posters. Their traditional painting instructor in a Mao Jacket promotes their Asian heritage and the bridge of Light still rates a visit. 
.
We start off with boys with haircuts done by their chums, from the dorms where the walls are decorated with posters of Rambo and The Chairman.  A pair are facing discipline for having roughed up one of their fellows, who disfigured their work. They discuss what to do with a Tracy Ermin exhibit, where only the bed can be recycled. A warden tells them not to sit on the art. One student doesn’t want to create, planning on becoming an entrepreneur. Somewhere in there, we get the killer Picasso quote “A good artist borrows from other artists. A great artist steals from other artists.” 

The leads become involved with the two girl music students, whose ambition is to give a concert together. There is a surprisingly relatable scene where they mimic the voice delivery of old dubbed Chinese movies. The glamorous one will quit to become a club singer while her plain friend’s mother has set up a meeting with the tailored student from an Ivy League university, where he studies French. He invites them all to dinner and the boys hog themselves at the buffet, in surroundings that contrast with their own grubby building, with its bunk beds and pink-painted steel window frames. 

I couldn’t help thinking about the presentations I used to do with the murky nineties Russian Agfacolor School for Beauty Appreciation two-reeler touting the slab concrete building with steel pipe chairs as surroundings from which we were told works of great artistry could only emerge.

It is remarkable that the crudely drawn characters lost in unexceptional lives become so involving. They have been voiced by home territory celebrities whose names don’t register here. Finally relating the subsequent lives, American Graffiti style, over snaps, given life by animating their still photo texture, is extraordinarily moving. I rate the film as the best I’ve seen from China since the second Wolf Warrior - maybe before. It has yet to open in its intended market.