Monday, 21 September 2026

The Current Cinema - Barrie Pattison recommends two box office hits from China - DEAR YOU (Hongchun Lan) & ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE MIDDLE EAST (Wen Muye)


Something is happening in Chinese Film, after decades of slim pickings. Their two most conspicuous talents have come back on line. Stephen Chow Sing-Chi has made his first film after seven years, Feng Xiaogang is doing serious work again and now, in quick succession, their two major new successes, Dear You and Once Upon a Time in the Middle East 
歡迎來龍餐館 (Welcome to the Loong Restaurant) are in our local multiplexes. Of course that’s a suspect qualification. These come to our attention because they are, among the several hundred movies a year made by Chinese film industry, ones we can actually see and they are not aimed at movie enthusiasts. I was the only gweilo in the audience on the crowded opening night of Middle East at the George Centre. There may be better (and there certainly are worse) films and most won’t have the (good) two language export version sub-titles these get.

What is curious is that their accessibility is not the result of endorsement by festivals and film critics. Rotten Tomatoes has yet to acknowledge Middle East. IMDB has a couple of uninformative critics’ notices and some user comments, which once again appeared in a bunch and read as if they gushed out of a press office. At least the flacks have now got their act together on English language spelling and punctuation.


The big surprise was Hongchun Lan’s Gei a ma de qing shu/ Dear You, made on a modest budget in the Teochew regional dialect, w
hile Beijing is trying to project the idea of a homogeneous Mandarin-speaking China. In Singapore, the theatre had to get special permission to screen it in the wake of a 1979 “Speak Mandarin” campaign. It was lying second in the year’s Chinese box office takings at last check.

In this one, young Zheng Runqi is deep in debt and hears about his grandfather who left provincial Chaoshan when menaced by conscription into Kuomintang forces during the Chinese Civil War, sending back qiaopiI/support contributions to his local wife, with letters the now elderly woman keeps in a trunk in her room. As a young emigrant, his grandfather is reputed to have started a second family and become rich out of the line of language schools named after him. Zheng conspires with an uncle to advance him the fare to Singapore, after stealing one of the grandmother’s cherished letters to find the sender’s return address, planning to demand his inheritance.

 Arriving, Zheng and the film both face confusion. Dear You resembles the entries that filled out those eighties Asian Film Festivals. Japanese and Hong Kong titles and were approachable to audiences used to western films. Less “contaminated” viewers were used to different pacing and plot developments while their entries were demanding to outsiders. 


Equipped with synopses and reviews I’m still shaky on some details here. Instead of the predictable pursuit of riches, we lose track of Zheng in a succession of flashbacks to his grandfather (Sitong Li) after his courtship of the younger edition of his grandmother (Xiaohui Wang). His pursuit of her as a traveling propaganda banner girl is particularly nice. In the South Asian new country, things don’t go to plan, including antagonising the daughter of his innkeeper landlord, she also being desired by the aggro professional letter writer, the actually author of the cherished envelopes (if Cyrano is stretching it, compare Kinuyo Tanaka’s 1953's Koibumi/Love Letter) and, still alive, he proves to be a major conduit into the details of the grandfather’s past. At this point, Zheng recedes and we find ourselves following the earlier generation, to the touching meeting with Usha Seamkhum, from the notable 2024 Bangkok Lahn Mah/How to Make Millions Before Grandma Dies. She is the one celebrity in a largely non pro. cast, which registers affectingly. 

The play-out title captions contain examples from the now vanished qiaopi industry sending money to original Chinese homes and and significantly financing the war against the Japanese invasion. These actual messages ramp up the already damp eyed content. 

The film has been running for six weeks here, where Feng Xiogang’s I Know Who You Are limped through one. The film has outperformed far bigger budget productions in more widely spoken dialects, being the number two box office performer of the year for a while. More striking, the audience I saw it with didn’t shuffle off into the street at the end but stayed in their seats talking about it and even asked me about my reaction in the elevator afterwards. That all lobs between impressive and phenomenal and would be big news if it were not for a subsequent development. 

Director Wen Muye’s new Once Upon a Time in the Middle East is even more impressive, using a substantiaI budget, with part shooting in IMAX and locations in the Sahara. I don’t get to see enough of these to talk about Chinese best ever but I’d have to go back to the peak years of King Hu to nominate a rival. It has already knocked out heavy competition to take the year’s number two box office champion spot - behind the third film of the Pegasus motor racing movie franchise, which also stars this film’s leading man, established comic Shen Teng. 


This actually gives the producers a problem. They are using an advertising campaign with a beaming Shen in a chef suit. People have been taking their children and becoming indignant when faced with intense drama. I’d seen Sheng in a few earlier films (Zhang Yimou’s Manjianghong/Full River Red) without paying any particular notice. However i
n this one, Shen carries a two hours twenty narrative in which he is central, appearing in near to every scene.

 We open with Shen, aged and scarfaced, escorted into an Airport Security Office, after a check reveals an old terrorist charge from which he assures them US authorities had cleared him. This is a script device which allows the film to break up the narrative by flashbacks - particularly effective in skipping over information which would have dissipated their ending. 

Shen first appears as a Chinese master cook, so deep in debt that he abandons his mother (Wei Qing, the only female character to get any attention) and indignant daughter, once again to earn enough to put his life back on track, by working in a Middle East country which is obviously Iraq, here called Bahata. He is collected from the airport by head waiter fellow countryman Jiang Qiming, who has been abroad long enough to pick up the language and the conniving needed to get by. Jiang is alarmed by Shen’s audacity, making demands of authoritative Loong Restaurant owner Sherif Sobhy, with Shen announcing he’s not going to prepare the sweetened imitation Chinese cuisine American customers expect - and that he wants to be a full partner in the business. This face-off between the three is the point that we realise we are seeing something out of the ordinary here, with Jiang amazed at Shen’s daring and brought down because the newcomer’s negotiated the spot Jiang wanted.


However there is another set piece on the way - the first of the cooking segments. Shen is soon preparing the spectacular outdoors iron pot mutton wedding - close ups of a stunt kitchen-worker’s hand’s rung in for the dazzling knife skills. These scenes punctuate the film like musical numbers and rule it off from what we’ve see in material from other sources. Food is constantly foregrounded in Chinese cinema but this must qualify as its most spectacular presentation. The actual kitchen footage is stunning, leaving the Cooking Shows and TV Commercial Product Shots we are used to in its dust - even if one of Shen’s specialties is candied scorpions.

Middle East has something more startling. The film’s real set piece occurs early, when the comparative calm is destroyed with a sudden 9/11 retaliation bombing raid. Entire city blocks explode around the leads, running for their lives, stamping on the head of a dead man in their panic. This is one of the most shocking pieces of film ever and it is an act of supreme confidence that the makers place it so early - like burning Atlanta before the interval.

Complications ensue with the children from the orphanage run by Jiang’s lady friend, now without shelter. Shen is equal to the challenge and soon has them sleeping on the floor and waiting tables in Loong Restaurant uniforms. Hang the child labor laws! Pilfering teenager Omar Sherif is caught out and abused for taking supplies when they are desperately short but that turns into one of the film’s most compelling sub plots. One of the strengths is the way of introducing characters as bit players, only to reveal they represent major plot elements. We are however getting ahead of ourselves.

Their needs mean contact with the black market which will make the operation boom when the Ba’athist Government falls and Sobhy becomes an official under the American occupation. Shen clears his debts but is lured by the cash flow from manipulating supplies, keeping The Loong Restaurant open on power permits Sobhy connives while their competitors have gone dark and serves liquor in a country where it’s forbidden. 



However they are operating just outside the Green Zone, living with violence and danger. The proximity of military prison Camp Alifah reveals insurgent leader Ahmed Salim, “The Headmaster” strung up naked, with Shen able to ease some of his suffering by faking the chilli water jailers funnel into him. At this point the post is over run and roles reversed with Shen struggling to prevent his own young deputy taking savage revenge. 

What is already a strong drama is further powered up by the introduction of child soldiers in training. Wen Muye's care in finding the most vulnerable and appealing looking young performers is deliberate. A checkpoint bombing is as startling as its counterpart in Raffi Pitts’ Soy Negro - which I notice no one has still been sufficiently enterprising to show here. We get the “Open Your mouth!” and “I promised God five children” scenes.

 

Of course, coming from a Chinese Marxist society the question is not just how good it is but what is it telling us. The Party Newspaper has reportedly endorsed this one. The film shows Americans in a country where they have no place to be, dying in encounters which provoke drunken survivors to murderous rage. But they are also pitiful, victims of power politics they will never understand. The Jihadis come out of things even worse, justifying their barbarism with allegiance to a God the film makers don’t believe exists. Though no one mentions El Qaida or Abu Ghraib, these are clearly models. The Chinese characters crave a peace which harms no one. Can’t argue with that, though how far it all corresponds with reality is something to question in some other space.


Once Upon a Time in the Middle East is a mix of expat. drama, military spectacle, imposing Egyptian performers, Soy Negro and Gone With the Wind - only with candied scorpions. It is a movie everyone should see but not everyone will enjoy. Either way, anyone with a serious interest in film, or for that matter a casual one, should rush down to the local multiplex and watch it. Whether this one gets past the one week that Feng Xioagang limped through and scores the attention it deserves, as a major production, is yet to be seen. 

Sunday, 13 September 2026

Streaming on Netflix - Rod Bishop recommends BANDI (Capucine and Éric Rochant, France/Martinique, 2026)

The five seasons of The Bureau (Le bureau des légendes) released between 2015 and 2020 might be the best screen contribution to the “secret world” since the BBC’s adaptations of the three John le Carré spy novels in the 1980s.

Éric Rochant, the French showrunner for The Bureau, now offers Bandi an eight-parter set on the Caribbean island of Martinique. The island is somewhat clumsily known as “French controlled Martinique”, or an “overseas region and department of France”. The Martinicans are French citizens and at one point in Bandi refer to France as “the mainland”. Hah.

Perhaps this helps explains the lax customs between France and this “overseas region”. A Martinique teenager is able to move a huge amount of cocaine in a suitcase to Paris, and disguise the contraband from sniffer dogs by using smells from a variety of tropical fruits. One dog emerges triumphantly from the suitcase with a huge pineapple in its mouth. Too easy.

Rochant and his co-showrunner daughter Capucine use a range of local non-professionals as actors. The series took a year to cast and is centered on the Lafleur family of eleven orphaned brothers and sisters who lose their matriarch. To avoid foster care they must fend for themselves on the mean streets of tropical Fort-de-France. 

Djody Grimeau(r) as Kylian

Unbeknownst to his siblings, sixteen-year-old schoolboy Kylian (Djody Grimeau) from the Lafleur family is established in town as the drug dealer “Milord”. He’s already a competitor to the head drug dealer SherKhan (Patrick Trieste) and when Kylian moves from ganja to cocaine he comes into fierce conflict with his family, particularly Annabelle (Ambre Bozza) and big brother Marvin (Cedric Camille). Both view his actions as conflicting with their late matriarch’s strong sense of morality.

Kylian and his right-hand boy Fatso (Lucas Pernock) also have to deal with Kylian’s unstable, chaotic brother Kingsley (Rodney Dijon), whose behaviour keeps threatening to expose their drug dealing.

These six central characters in Bandi are all played by non-professionals. 

Patrick Trieste aka Evil P2

The compelling Patrick Trieste, playing drug lord SherKhan, is also a first-timer. He is rising star in the influential Trap Antillais music scene and performs under the name Evil P. Originating from Martinique and Guadeloupe, Trap Antillais is a fusion of drill beats with Caribbean dancehall, trap, rap, local Creole lyrics, and a distinctly energetic Martinique style known as “shatta”. Trap forms the musical soundtrack to Bandi (local Creole for gangster).

It’s clearly well researched and bravely cast, and although it may sound like other French gang flics such as La Haine (1997), Bandi is on an entirely different scale. Fort-de-France looks small, and it is. With a population of 74,000, it’s a small country town compared with the gang wars of Paris, Marseille or Lyon. What’s significant is the cocaine that comes in industrial sized quantities from nearby Venezuela, and lands in the hands of Martinican school children. 

Eighty percent of the guns in Martinique are in the hands of 14-to-25-year-olds.

Bandi hasn’t had the impact of The Bureau and was not renewed for a second season. Rochant is now reportedly working on Secret People, a new spy series for Canal+, based on five intelligence agents from the US, UK, France, Russia and China.

Friday, 11 September 2026

On 4K UHD - David Hare rhapsodizes over the Imprint Powell & Pressburger Box set


As I was test driving the four UHD/Dolby Vision discs of RED SHOES, I KNOW WHERE I'M GOING, THE SMALL BACK ROOM and TALES OF HOFFMANN, my heart temporarily jumped into my mouth when the HOFFMANN disc refused to load the menu page. Turned out the fucking plastic disc holder in the fucking boxes had led my clumsy hand to get a finger smudge over the disc which managed to half-blind the menu page. Anyway the usual window cleaner and linen tea towel rubbing center to out gig did the trick.
Some very short words then for anyone contemplating it: The hand of David McKenzie and FIM is all over these encodes. Gorgeous is not strong enough a term. Already great Dolby VIsion THE RED SHOES suddenly gains a step up in primary color pop and the sharpness is surgically exact down to ultra fine grain which never floats or sticks. The grain management is so beautiful thatI KNOW WHERE I'M GOING, whose UHD 8Bit encode released by Criterion which is already quite lovely now takes off into the realm of a pristine 35mm virgin 35mm print. The grain is again flawless even in the most disparate shots from DP Hillier shooting in Magic Hour for the exteriors.Image is so perfect you can perceive details within the detail of scrawling cumulus clowds while the sky and the shadow on the land change by the millsecond.I would rate this as one of the five best so far B&W Academy Ratio films to get an encode that seriously emulates to perfection the actual qualities of film emulsion .
THE RED SHOES is also a lift in several areas complementing the Criterion, itself a very beautiful transfer for their debut UHD release back a few years now. But wait: colors are popping like crazy and this is all happening within the enlarging envelopes of production design and costume. And then in the sequence when Vicky arrives at Monte Carlo, shot outdoors in daylight, the primaries really start to sing, and pop like crazy, all the while the wide shot opening is, for the first time I’ve ever seen, really sharp with Warner Archive level three strip alignment down to the microdot. When the figures moving to the hotel in the Criterion looked a tad soft, they’re now sharp as a pin in depth and the whole sequence looks like something out of first gen three strip registration. 

These are all perhaps little things but they carry on through the picture to the end giving what can only be a called a definitive presentation. And I have to say much the same for HOFFMANN for which this is the first UHD/4k disc ever, plus Dolby VIsion again. You really notice it in the fine detail, movements from distant to close retain razor sharp definition, grain breathes and lives without a trace of clinging and freezing. All this does however slightly magnify the color grading which is the same as the Blu-ray and which feels to me slightly gray edged to the skin tones and the baseline. But that’s for another day.

I decided to lash out on this if only for HOFFMANN and I’m glad I did but the steps up in rendition for the other three UHD 4K discs I think really make it worthwhile.


 

Wednesday, 9 September 2026

The Current Cinema - Overwhelming mayhem unleashed in BY ANY MEANS (Elegance Bratton, USA, 2026)


Spoiler alert. The whole plot is given away

OK. First start with the last. At the end of By Any Means there are forty five people credited as producers, executive producers, co-executive producers and co-producers. There is also a person credited as “Associate Producer”. With all that creative input how could anything go wrong.

 

I don’t suppose it does in a way. There are parallel openings to the movie. First we see Marc Wahlberg taking a baseball bat to a man who is tied up, battered and bruised. Wahlberg, playing gangster Greg Scarpa, wants names of the battered man’s criminal associates. He gives them up and Wahlberg continues to lay into him with the baseball bat. OK…we’ve got the message he’s a cold-blooded sadist as well as everything else we’ll discover about him. It took a moment to recognise Wahlberg because here he sports a rather prominent false nose. If you follow it, it's been on the online low-rent media for over a year.

 

Cut to  an African American in a suit walking down a corridor.  We learn he’s an FBI Agent and quickly discover he’s a token black guy. He’s sidelined and ignored.  We learn that in the days when and where the movie is set, 1960s Mississippi, since the FBI was created a half a century or more ago, there have been barely a couple of handfuls of black FBI Agents. Agent Wayne Strider (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II)  has asked for a transfer to an office in the south where he is treated mostly with disdain and not allocated any meaningful detective work. He wants to take on the Ku Klux Klan but it’s not until the regional FBI manager, in some desperation, decides that he’s going to play fast and loose that things start to happen.  Scarpa has a sideline as a fixer for the FBI when all else fails. He and Strider are given the job to find the KKK killers of civil rights activist Vernon Dahmer. Then the mayhem really starts. 

 

Scarpa is a psychopath. After the initial bashing, in case you weren’t convinced he might have an evil streak, he shoots a traffic cop for basically no reason at all.  Then a series of extremely violent scenes take place until some kind of honour is finally served. Scarpa goes back to his criminal life in New Jersey and Strider accepts you have to make compromises to bring some people to some kind of justice. That’s it…. another film that’s inspired by true American events…

Sunday, 6 September 2026

For Blu-ray and Ultra 4K UHD discs - Here's why David Hare recommends the Hisense C3 Ultra triple laser projector


Top screen the new Capelight UHD 4K of the Robert Wise's WEST SIDE STORY.

Below it's my newest toy, a new Hisense C3 Ultra triple laser projector which I’ve now had for a week and will take to my grave.
It’s only been in the last couple of years that projectors, and in particular Laser-based DLP beamers like this and Valerion, XGIMI and others, started making top tier light power bomb tech. Back a couple of years ago when I bought some new Hifi to replace very old and fading gear I became a convert to the emerging Chi-FI world with fabulous products like Shanling and more, which are so good in their tech and design they have as many of you know overtaken the great traditional Brit sound Hifi titans including Arcam and others who themselves retain the spec and design for their amps but go to manufacturers in China.
I have been having the newbie’s kiddie time fiddling with this and that but quite frankly the preset options for the usual parameters have been flawlesssly enabled in the “FilmMaker” mode where presets are minimally adjustable to, well, perfection. I can blow the image from this baby out to 300 inch diagonal but I am happy (for now) to stick with a 130 inch 4:3 screen.
And to wallow in Dolby VIsion which has up until now has been unavailable to me in its full glory.

It certainly gives the 4K of Wise’s 1961 movie a depth and level of detail that really does reflect the 70mm original elements, notwithstanding reported degradation in the neg. Sometimes the DV is overwhelming. Certainly every smear of the dusk makeup on some of the honky boys playing Hispanics is VERY loud and clear. The sheer level of detail in this is unbelievable. If anyone out there is wondering about a keen projection deal I cannot recommend this highly enough. I don’t know if it’s luck but I did not see a skerrick of Rainbow effect/RBE, not even in the 3D setting here.
And in closing, Imprint Australia shipped the Powell/Pressburger box last week and I expect to receive it in the next few days. One of several unique joys of that set is the first time worldwide release of a UHD 4K disc presentation of TALES OF HOFFMANN in Dolby Vision. I can safely admit this single event (of many surprises with that new boxset) was what prompted me to pull the trigger on this gorgeous new projector last month. 


Having just watched new 4K discs like WEST SIDE STORY and the new UHD of AUNTIE MAME with the full gamut on the projector, the next screening of HOFFMANN will, I expect transport me back to an afternoon in June 1982 in NYC at a West Village screening room when a friend and I attended a semi-“private” screening of what must have been Scorsese’s IB print of HOFFMANN. It was my first viewing and it left me speechless on the floor with pleasure, sufficient to stay and sit through the very dull LUNA DE MIEL ( a total stinker) to watch HOFFMANN again. Merci Powell and Pressburger (and Hein Heckroth and Chris Challis and Beecham and the cast, and indeed Offenbach lui-même) who between them all took me to paradise. And will no doubt again.

Saturday, 5 September 2026

Screening somewhere - Rod Bishop retrieves the overlooked THIS MUST BE THE PLACE (Paolo Sorrentino, Italy, 2011)


Robert Smith, the creator, writer, and vocalist of British band The Cure has made no public comment about this Sorrentino film. 

But Smith’s face-painted, lip-sticked, gothic, ragged visage has clearly been lifted by the Italian director for Sean Penn’s Cheyenne: a dissolute, squeaky-voiced, former rock god who gave up the profession after a couple of young brothers committed suicide from listening to his angst-ridden “depressed songs for depressed kids”.

Sorrentino has said: “I saw [Robert Smith] backstage after a concert in Rome…it’s a disconcerting dichotomy to see a guy of fifty years with the look of a sixteen-year-old, you don’t know what to focus on. Apparently Robert Smith keeps this look because his wife loves it, so he has that look all day, not only when he goes to a concert.”

Cheyenne is living a lonely life in a Dublin mansion with his wife Jane (Francis McDormand), who loves him and his “look”. If the idea of a Robert Smith lookalike shacking up with Francis McDormand seems unbelievable, well yes, it is. Sorrentino clearly knows it’s unbelievable, but he has only just started playing games with his audience.

Unfortunately, the first act is almost as bad as the film’s title. Sometimes, a song title for a film title isn’t a great idea, even if this one does come from Talking Heads. Serious audience endurance is required for the rambling first 40 mins, but the film does eventually take a dramatic tonal shift as Cheyenne travels to New York to see his dead father, a former survivor of Auschwitz. Cheyenne then enlists the help of a veteran Nazi hunter (Judd Hirsch), clearly modelled on Simon Wiestenthal, and pursues his father’s on-the-run Nazi tormenter, through New Mexico and Utah. 

It’s incongruous, of course – seeing a Robert Smith look-alike drag his suitcase through desert and mountain landscapes, to take revenge on a World War II monster, but Sorrentino pulls off a final confrontation between the goth and the 95-year-old Nazi, that’s as memorable as most things in cinema.

Made on a budget of $28 million, it grossed a ridiculous $144,000 in the USA, despite the presence of Oscar-winners Penn and McDormand and a soundtrack and live performance from David Byrne. 


However, it did take $8 million in Italy and close to a million in both Germany and France. It’s a film about the USA for Europeans.

The weirdness of This Must Be the Place is reminiscent of a small group of other notable Americana road movies written and directed by Europeans that tanked at the box office.

US friends of mine were scathing about Paris, Texas (1984) from the German Wim Wenders, sneering at what they perceived as an Americana fetishization of billboard signage. It didn’t appear that way to Europeans, however, who promptly gave the film the Palme d’Or.


The prolific Spanish director Bigus Luna also had a go at Americana in Reborn (1982). Dennis Hopper is a television evangelist who enlists the Italian mafia to supply him with a stigmatist to help him reap in donations at Texan church meetings. A real Italian woman who can’t speak English but who can bleed at Christ’s crucifixion wounds turns up, and Hopper’s evangelist abruptly turns virtually catatonic. Reborn is almost certainly the only time in the cinema where three petrol pump jockeys appear as The Three Wise Men. The film never made it past VHS and is now only available in dodgy bootlegs.



The crazed Serbian filmmaker Emir Kusturica, twice winner of the Palme d’Or, went all Americana in 1993 with the surrealist Arizona Dream, casting Johnny Depp as a flying fish expert who loves listening to the dreams of fish while working for New York’s Department of Fish and Game. He journeys to Douglas, Arizona, to work in a car dealership (run by Jerry Lewis) and becomes romantically involved with a husband-killer (Faye Dunaway), who is trying to build a flying machine, and with her daughter (Lili Taylor) who plays accordion to her pet turtles. It’s a film about magic realism and dreamers, and was very cooly received in the USA and elsewhere. 

Made for a budget of $19 million, it played in only three cinemas in the USA for a ridiculous gross of $112,000. The New Zealand box office gross was $24. Europeans, however, gave it the Special Jury Prize at Berlin.

These weird USA road movies by Europeans for Europeans - despite the star power of Penn, Depp, Dunaway, McDormand, Hopper, Jerry Lewis and David Byrne - haven’t come within a coo-ee of covering their budgets. Paris, Texas did the best, even though Harry Dean Stanton and Nastassja Kinski can’t be classed as star power. It grossed $3.5 mill worldwide and on a budget of $1.8 mill, it might have broken even. But for the backroom executives, $3.5 mill is a poor return on a Palme d’Or winner.

But who wants to live in a world where Arizona DreamThis Must Be the PlaceReborn and Paris, Texas can’t be made?

Tuesday, 1 September 2026

AT THE FESTIVAL OF DANGEROUS IDEAS - Read Jane Mills introduction to the screening of SALO OR THE 120 DAYS OF SODOM (Pier Paolo Pasolini, Italy, 1975)


Editor's Note: Jane Mills wishes to note the superb contribution to discussion of Salo by Professor Catherine Lumby when the film screened at the Randwick Ritz as part of an earlier extensive season of Pasolini's films supported by Cinema Reborn. 

                                                            ***********************************

Introduction to Pasolini’s Salò, or the 120 days of Sodom (1975) by Associate Professor Jane Mills at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas, Dendy Cinema, 29 August 2026

 

I know of no work of art  as shocking as Pasolini’s Salò.

Murder, torture, sexual abuse are all depicted.

Most shocking of all is the depiction of absolute power and its abuse:

Abuse by for libertines -- an aristocrat, a bishop,  a magistrate and a high financier, representing the State, the Church, the Law and Big Business. Their power underpinned by  a network of informers and collaborators.  Their victims reduced to commodities, owned and disposed at whim. 
[Were Pasolini making the film today, would he,  I wonder, have included a media magnate?]

 

Salò is  shocking –and dangerous –  not only because of what it tells but how it tells. So many dangerous ideas inform how  it was made. 

·       Pasolini uses the classic writings of the Marquis de Sade and Dante to create a dark allegory to critique fascism, capitalist consumerism, and absolute power.

·       His sets display elegant art deco décor and avant garde artwork – art that the Nazis banned as decadent— to highlight the ugly brutality of the libertines.

·       The film’s creative cinematography positions audiences not as the victims (which might invite us to empathise with them), but as the abusers,- thereby making us, the audience, collaborators.


These are dangerous ideas, pushing filmmaking ideas to their limits. 

 

But even more dangerous than Pasolini’s  ideas opposing fascism and neoliberal consumerist economics, are these ideas themselves. De Sade’s sadomasochism shows how power reduces the human body to a commodity. Neo-capitalist consumerism requires the brutal destruction, enslavement, and extermination of indigenous and traditional societies – i.e. what Pasolini called “anthropological genocide.” 

 

These dangerous ideas aren’t  why  the film was persistently banned in Australia. But before outlining the Australian history of censoring Salò, let’s remind purselves that in 1966,  the Roman Catholic Church abolished its Index of Forbidden Books and Films.  It shifted its philosophy from enforced institutional censorship to trusting the mature moral conscience of individual believers.

Not so Australian governments. Our Film Classification Board might state: “adults should be able to read, hear, see and play what they want.”  But on this, it doesn’t deliver.

The film was released in 1975 – three days after Pasolini was tortured and murdered.  In 1976 Australia banned it.  A year later. No one could buy, sell, import, exhibit or see it – it offended, was obscene.

In 1993, it was unbanned. The classifiers deemed it: “a serious work of art pursuing a serious political purpose.” The sky didn’t fall in, but in the mid ’90s, “reason began to slumber, and monsters gathered.”  A revised classification code now ordained artistic merit was no longer permissible as a major defense. 

And in 1998, Salò was re-banned.

In 2010 it was unbanned. Salò received a R18+ rating.  Which should mean anyone over the age of 18 can see it.  More on this later.

 

The censors’ language justifying the bans often makes no sense. 

1.         You should know the Classification Board does NOT ban or censor, it only “classifies.” However, one of the categories is RC, meaning ‘Refused Classification.’  This means it can’t be sold, hired, advertised, distributed, or shown publicly without potentially incurring a fine of up to $825,000 and/or 10 years’ imprisonment.

I’m no English language scholar. But I can spot a euphemism when I see one. And as George Orwell wrote:  “political language has to consist largely of euphemism…and sheer cloudy vagueness to make brutal actions sound acceptable.”

2.         Obscene supposedly  means “to cause or give offence.”  To offend means: “saying or doing something rude, upsetting or embarrassing.”  It also means: “to go against a law, duty, or standard.”

·       Hopefully, fascism does go against our laws. 

·       I also hope it  goes against the moral standard to which most Australians adhere.

But this is an entirely circular argument: You “offend” by going against a law, duty or standard by going against a law, duty or standard. And Logic 101  teaches that using the conclusion of an argument as its own premise, is a logical fallacy. More evidence, I suggest, of what happens when reason slumbers. 

 

3.         As to the “revolting fetishes” of which you're about to see plenty.

Are audiences –are you– really going to rush home afterwards to eat poo and ask your partner to wee on you?  And if you do?  I should care –let alone mind? 

(Pasolini’s recipe incidentally: melted Swiss chocolate, condensed milk, broken biscuits and marmalade. And a mixture of weak tea and apple juice for the pee.)

 

4.         Then there’s  “artistic intent”: I am completely certain Pasolini had no intention of ‘offending.’  His intentions were to shock, disgust, revolt  Or, as he put it: “to awaken a slumbering society and remind audiences of past horrors.”

These horrors were Salò, the puppet Nazi state that ruled most of Italy from September 1943 to April 1945. Pasolini applies “obscenity” metaphorically to the absence of the rule of law under fascism. 

 

5.         As for the film’s offensive “cruelty with high impact”? Can the impact for seeing it even approach the actual impact during the 17 months of Salò?

·       The 9,000 Jews and 30,000 political opponents, partisans and workers arrested and deported? 

·       90% of whom who died in Nazi extermination camps?

·       The 70,000 civilians and resistance members killed in reprisal massacres by German and Italian Republic forces?

 

6.         Lastly, that R18+ ruling: Adults can now only see Salò as a home video package, containing contextualizing material – such as essays and documentaries. (Don’t get me wrong, the documentaries and essays with the Criterion BluRay  are excellent.) But this patronizing attitude sincerely offends me. Since when has adult education been mandatory in Australia? 

Similarly Cinema Screenings are permitted at festivals only if contextualizing critical analysis is provided. I, ladies and Gtntlement, am your mandatory adult education! This ruling contributes yet more “cloudy vagueness”  aiming make censoring actions censorship acceptable.

~~~<<>>~~~

When I saw Salò again recently (for the third time), the film awakened me not just to past horrors but to present horrors.

The film’s arguably comic ‘beautiful bum contest’, evoked television reality shows where contestants willingly participate in their own commodification.  And the film’s absurdist weddings reminded me of ‘Married at First Sight.’

They’re perfect examples of Pasolini’s notion of anthropological genocide which he defined as “a form of destruction that homogenizes society and destroys authentic human relationships by turning the human body itself into a marketable commodity.”

And how could I not think of:

·       the absence of the rule of law in today’s internment camps and occupied territories, 

·       current leaders remaining in power despite arrest warrants for committing genocide and other war crimes?   

·       a President actively renaming art centres and campaigning to disable the International Criminal Court? 

To my amazement, for the first time, I also saw some tenderness and protest, even some hope.  

Now, this is NOT  what Pasolini intended.  He intended to shock us from our complacent, complicit slumbers while powerholders abuse with impunity. 

I recently likened Salò’s relationship with Australian Classification Board to game of ping pong. I regret making this comparison. Censorship is not a game. 

Salò awakens audiences to the dangerous idea that in a world fearful of ideas, the biggest threat to democracy is not the portrayal of violence and evil, but the silencing of those who express dangerous ideas like accountability, freedom, equality.

This is a film that’s unwatchable and must be watched.