Showing posts with label Marco Bellocchio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marco Bellocchio. Show all posts

Saturday, 20 June 2026

IL CINEMA RITROVATO - A Bologna Diary - Opening Day and some underwhelming moments

Fists in the Pocket

Il Cinema Ritrovato gets underway on a Saturday afternoon. That's after a bit of show business involving the festival's artistic direction team in the marvellous Modernissimo cinema under a corner of Bologna's Piazza Maggiore. Last night  a few people sneaked off to see Marco Bellocchio introduce a 4K restoration of his debut feature Fists in the Pocket.  It was hailed as a masterpiece back in the day and remains so..or at least that was the advice of someone who was there. Two years ago Bellocchio, who is the Chair of the Foundation that manages the Cineteca di Bologna (pardon if my understanding of the governance arrangements is a bit thin) presented his film Slap the Monster on Page One, a brilliant excoriation of the right wing yellow press which Cinema Reborn went after for its 2025 season but to no avail. The rights holder didn't answer our polite email enquiries.

But the real show started today and for me there were three screenings in a row in the Jolly Cinema. Two years ago it was loudly trumpeted that the aircon in the Jolly had finally been fixed but the sad news is that it seems to have, like many Catholics, lapsed once more. The swelter seems to be back.

Amma Ariyan

First up though was Amma Ariyan (John Abraham, India, 1986)  from India's Parallel Cinema cohort. The catalogue notes tell us this was  "Abraham’s final work before his untimely death in 1987. It is a film that details the history of revolutionary politics in Kerala through the prism of the road movie, adopting an iconoclastic structure in which flashbacks, ellipses and inserts punctuate the narrative with personal and historical reports on social resistance and political disillusionment, including the militant labour riots of Cochin in 1953." 

The restored film screened in Cannes Classics just last month and the restoration work was done by Shivendra Singh Dengapur's Film Heritage Foundation. Anti Alanen told me how impressed he was by it, a profound film. I found watching it a slog I have to say. Screened in a superb 4K restoration where a lot of work has been done on the sound.

Publicity shot for Easy Living

Light relief followed with Mitchell Leisen's Easy Living,  screening on a 35mm print, the first film in the Leisen strand and kicking off with one of the director's least subtle comedies. There are likely more pratfalls in this movie than in the rest of Leisen's entire career. It's called screwball and the moments when Jean Arthur expresses her incomprehension as to why such privilege and lavish hospitality is being rained down on her are brilliant. Preston Sturges script is either too broad for comfort or Leisen made it so. Who will ever know but it may have been one of those crucial moments that caused Sturges to want to film his own scripts.

Daisuke Ito may well have been a totally unknown (outside Japan) name until the Bologna team announced it was devoting a major retrospective to him. Curator Johan Nordstrom spelt out in detail just how much institutional and corporate assistance has gone into the Daisuke Ito selection - three silent films with Benshi and traditional Japanese instrumental accompaniment, plus a seven film sound period selection. 

Osho

Co-curator Alexander Jacoby introduced the first Ito sound film Osho  suggesting that it was slightly to one side of Ito's Jidaigeki  movies. The catalogue note says Osho is "
Arguably the most famous film of Ito’s postwar career, ... a biopic of a master of shogi (the canonical Japanese variant of chess). From a humble background, illiterate and initially selftaught, Sakata Sankichi (1870-1946) rose to rank among the great players of his generation. Ito focuses on his rivalry with Kinjiro Sekine, the leading professional player of his era.

Chess is not a great background for a movie of interest to many. Dont ask me how I know this, I just do. This film doesn't jump that hurdle and the ecstasy of an obsessed man and the agony of those who have to put up with his obsessions is not something that grabbed me. I think I'm going to be even more appreciative of the jidaigeki movies to come.

The excitement of the day wasn't/isn't on the movie screen. As I write this Ivory Coast is putting up a great show in its World Cup match against Germany. The Africans are far more imaginative, elegant and exciting...It's 1/1...who knows...

Friday, 28 June 2024

The Road to Bologna (8) - PAT GARRETT & BILLY THE KID (Sam Peckinpah, USA, 1974), SLAP THE MONSTER ON PAGE ONE (Marco Bellocchio, Italy, 1972)

Kris Kristofferson, James Coburn
Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid

Fifty years on and Criterion have done a digital restoration of some quality for a movie that turned out not to be, as the distributor apparently hoped according to Criterion's Lee Kline, another Wild Bunch. Instead MGM got and hacked up, for their troubles a languid western with Dylan's beautiful soundtrack that dabbles in the power of the early robber baron capitalists and shows Billy the Kid as a total pyschopath of no redeeming virtue beyond Kris Kristofferson's blue eyes and angelic face. 

Chisum, whose name is invoked throughout is played by Barrie Sullivan, one of those given a credit at the start of the movie. Those later spotted in bit and small parts included a panoply of names that I doubt I recognised back in 1974 when I last saw the film - Katy Jurado, Chill Wills, L Q Jones, Jason Robards, R G Armstrong, Paul Fix, Elisha Cook, Jack Elam, Slim Pickens, Harry Dean Stanton, Gene Evans and Dub Taylor. The Academy is going to give an Award for best casting sometime soon. If they gave one back in 1974 Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid would have been a shoo-in.

Laura Betti, Gian Maria Volonte
Slap the Monster on Page One

Marco Bellocchio filled the new/old Modernissimo cinema first with his 1972 film Slap the Monster on Page One and then for a conversation with Sergio Castellito and Gianluca Farinelli. I couldn't handle the earphone translation for the latter but the former went over a treat - a brutal tale of the manipulative capitalist press seeking to meld public opinion to its political agenda. Familiar... Bellocchio says he doesn't folds the same political opinions now as he did back then but his ability to deal with a subject with ferocity was at its peak...


Friday, 23 February 2024

Sixty Years of International Art Cinema 1960-2020 - Bruce Hodsdon continues his series - 6 (23) Italy Part 6 - Pasolini, Rosi, the new generation

Pier Paolo Pasolini


Pasolini’s conflicted passions                                                                                                                                                                                                      

Poet, novelist, essayist, script-writer, auteur, Pier Paolo Pasolini (1922-75) dedicated much time to try and reconcile the Catholicism ingrained in him from childhood with Gramscian Marxism which gave him the tools to think through the problems of oppression. His intellectual development was also shaped by the humanism at the core of the Italian school program: the idea of history as the continual process of perfecting an abstract humanity. It nurtured his famed “myth of innocence” with which the peasantry, sub-proletariat and Third World represent existence outside of Western history. 

Pasolini deeply regretted the advent of technocracy and consumerism. By the mid 60s he enthusiastically subscribed to Freudianism which, like Marxism, constituted an attack on bourgeois ideology. Freud also offered him a clear and “scientific” theory of the cause and nature of homosexuality exposing Marxism's inadequacy in addressing sexual oppression and led him to highlight the private sphere as the location for struggle.  

This summary is based on Mauriziano Viano’s A Certain Realism:making use of Pasolini's Film Theory and Practice 1993  ch. 1.  (1-5)

When Pasolini started directing films in 1961, he had already worked on the scripts of some 15 other movies for directors like Fellini and Bolognini. it was on the strength of his well-received Roman novels, ‘Ragazzi di vita (1955) and ‘Una vita violenta’ (1959) that he was first asked to work on scripts set in the same milieu as his novels, also true of his first films as director, Accattone (1961) and Mamma Roma (1962), which form a group with the two novels as much as with his subsequent films. It was the disappointment with the way his scenarios were directed by others, that gave Pasolini the push he needed to make films himself. (Viano 6)

Anna Magnani, Mamma Roma

He wanted to make his films as he wrote poems or novels, “to be author of my own work at every moment.” Pasolini did not want to co-author films in the industry sense of transferring a script to the screen, and this included generally not using professional actors. He nevertheless chose Anna Magnani for the role of Mamma Roma because she had been so identified with Rome since her appearance in Rome Open City. There were apparent tensions when he tried to tone down, without success, the ‘’excess’ of her playing in the part of Mamma Roma. (Stack 49-53,  ibid 97), Rohdie 79)

Pasolini’s Marxist credentials and his use of locations and non-professional actors such as Franco Citti in the portrayal of desperate lives, as in Bicycle Thieves and La Terra Trema, that first raised hopes amongst leftist critics of a socially conscious neorealist revival. (Greene  25)

Franco Citti, Accattone

Accattone, the title character of Pasolini’s first film, is a pimp in the lowest strata of the poverty- stricken Roman community - the ‘borgate’. He is linked by Pasolini to the figure of Christ and the events portrayed have a mythic quality. Mamma Roma, working the streets as a prostitute, is also on the lowest strata but unlike Accattone she has petit-bourgeois ideals and is trapped in the futility of petit-bourgeois morality “like a home, job, keeping up appearances, the radio, going to mass on Sundays.” Pasolini described Accattone’s dreams as “epic-mythic-fantastic.” (Stack 46)

In ennobling his lower classes Pasolini shows their contradictions: they are victims but not passive and, as such, are not without dignity and complexity. Far more haunted by death than most neo-realist films, both Accattone and Mamma Roma are also overtly Christian in the way they are portrayed (what Pasolini called the “epical religious”). This too must have disturbed the leftists. 

Death is stressed even more in Mamma Roma than in Accattone. The arrangement at the table at the opening wedding banquet in Mamma Roma suggests The Last Supper.  Mamma Roma’s son Ettore’s final agony, is likened to that of the dead Christ in Mantegna’s painting ‘Christo Motto’. The “epical religious” mixing of the Roman sub-proletariat with the music of Bach in Accattone scandalised the critics whereas the combination of Vivaldi, more Italian and popular, with the petit-bourgeois in Mamma Roma is less confronting. 

Naomi Greene refers to the precarious tension between passion and ideology inhabiting Pasolini’s first films which gives them a special tone as neorealist milieus and social concerns are filtered through a deeply religious, fatalistic sensibility (39). He agreed with Roland Barthes that the cinema should not try to make sense but suspend it. In keeping with this, his films “are not supposed to have a finished sense, they always end with a question" (Stack 56).

Orson Welles, La Ricotta

Pasolini contributed an ironic film-within-a-film, La ricotta (1963), to an anthology, RoGoPaG (1963), made up of four contributions (the other three by Rossellini, Godard, and Gregoretti). Pasolini uses the Crucifixion as a metaphor.  A poor, unemployed worker Stracci earns a pittance as a stand-in portraying “the good thief” in a cheap commercial picture about Christ’s life. Orson Welles plays the director of the film and reads a poem by Pasolini expressing nostalgic melancholy for eras long past.  

Stracci uses every free minute to take food from the set to his family while also overindulging (ricotta cheese his favourite) and dying of indigestion on the cross. His death is discovered as the producer visits the location for a luxurious banquet entertaining upper class guests. A sophisticated use of music - from a Gregorian chant ‘Dies Irae’ to Scarlatti, and the twist - “helps to hold together this outcry against the betrayal of religion, the consumer society, social injustice, and cynicism” (Liehm 240).  Neo-fascist youths assaulted Pasolini and others at the Roman premiere.  He was brought to trial, receiving a suspended four month jail sentence for “the defamation of the state religion.” This was especially harsh since, as Naomi Greene points out, “La ricotta deals less with religion per se than with the degraded position it occupies in contemporary society, and, especially with the way(s) it is represented” (Greene 61).

Pasolini had an aversion to the illusion of naturalism that was at the core of neo-realism. Rather than linking things in a natural flow he isolates them, breaking a sense of spatial and temporal continuity. When using long takes, as in Mamma Roma’s night walks, they are stylised in a way that breaks the natural flow of things sought by many of the neorealists. When characters are seated in groups he pans from one face to the other, each person speaking to the camera, non-naturalistically and abruptly, rather than to each other. Greene borrows a metaphor from French critic  André Bazin to highlight that “while the neorealists waited patiently for reality to unveil itself, a brutal Pasolini meets it head-on.”  Measured camera rhythms, slow camera movements, frontal shots, and long close-ups all create a stylised poetic universe that is, as Pasolini remarked, “a frontal, romantic, chiaroscuro world.” (see Greene 42-4)

The environments that were the settings in most of Pasoliini’s films of the early to the mid-60s are, as previously noted, set in the Roman periphery called the borgate where populations were moved into public housing during the Fascist period. This then developed into the progressive social housing experience of the 1950s. Apparently working within its tradition, Pasolini used the borgate to critique neorealism and the  “architectural neo-realism” of Roman urban planning under fascism, and during the post-war economic miracle, in what he saw as contemptuous treatment of Rome’s poor. (Rhodes 125)

While settling accounts with neo-realism in his first two films, Pasolini marked himself as the poet of the Roman borgate. His films in the mid-60s were markedly different from his first films but also from each other except in the shared denominator of stylistic experimentation. What all the films of this phase share is a Gramscian inflection in their social and political concerns. A founder of the Italian Communist Party Antonio Gramsci was rare among Marxist theorists in attributing a revolutionary role to the peasantry. He also urged intellectuals to abandon their traditional ivory towers to form “organic links” with the working class to lead battles in the domain of schools, the media and the arts with the intent of creating a new “national-popular culture” - “national” meaning not the nationalism of the nation-state but a sharing of history and traditions especially among the common people, and “popular” in the sense of a popular culture - not populism. (ibid)

The Gospel According to Matthew 

Pasolini said that “the key by which I conceived Il Vangelo secondo Matteo/ The Gospel According to Matthew (he deliberately removed Saint from Matthew in the title) and that drove me to make it, was Jesus’s sentence in the Gospel that he had come ‘not to bring peace on earth…but to bring division, a man against his father, a daughter against her mother“ (Matt. 10:34) (Viano 133).

Pasolini’s final film of this phase, Uccellacci e uccellini / Hawks and Sparrows (1966), was the director’s farewell to the world of the sub-proletariat as well as to the first part of his oeuvre, “a parting homage to the ideological and cinematic matrix of his formative years as a filmmaker. It is “a film about the end of ideology, the end of commitment. Hawks and Sparrows marks, for Pasolini, the final liquidation of neorealism, the fading of the political hopes first represented by Gramsci and the Resistance partisans and his moving progressively farther and farther away from neorealism in the adoption of the parable form (either modern or set in an antique past). He regarded Hawks and Sparrows as his “purest film” in the sense of being “the product of cinematographic rather than figurative culture, unlike Accattone.” (Bondanella 184, Stack 99))

After Hawks and Sparrows Pasolini entered a phase of political withdrawal that happened to coincide with the upsurge in left-wing political life in 1968. Pasolini’s isolation was probably motivated by despair with what he saw as the incapacity of the PCI or the ultra-left to halt the “death dealing capitalist embourgeoisement of the world he loved.”  (Nowell-Smith 18)

In his first major essay about film, Il Cinema di poesia (1965), Pasolini provided a theoretical map of his view of the poetic intuitions that marked his work. He always used the word “poetic” positively to refer to the superior status of the image that is not straight-jacketed into a single meaning, best describing the language as “spoken” by reality and by cinematic images. As previously mentioned, Pasolini  had an aversion to the illusion of naturalism that was the core of neorealism. He preferred to isolate things that were in a natural flow by breaking the sense of spatial and temporal continuity central to classical narrative (Rohdie 3-4).

“I love life so fiercely, so desperately, that nothing good can come of it” 1960  quoted in Siciliano p 32

“Pasolini (in his death) has successfully evaded the mortal synthesis, and reproduces around his corpse all the contradictions that characterised his multifarious activities.” -Don Ranvaud p 204

The above is drawn from a note in CTEQ Annotations on Film in Senses of Cinema which includes more information of the “conflicted passions” in Pasolini’s life, further discussion of Accattone and Mamma Roma, and footnotes as referenced in the above text.

Filmography  The national-popular phase based in Pasolini's “epical-religious poetry” and Antonio Gramsci's revisionist Marxism  (5 filmsAccatone 61, Mamma Roma 62, La ricotta in Rogopag 62, The Gospel According to St Matthew 64, Hawks and Sparrows 66) ; the self-styled “unpopular” phase (2 films from the appropriation of Greek myth in Oedipus Rex 67 and Medea 69, and 2 contemporary  fables in Teorema 68 and Porcile 69); the “trilogy of life”, a “dream world of guiltless sexuality “(The Decameron 71, The Canterbury Tales 72, Arabian Nights 73);  Salò 75  was to be the first of a trilogy based on Dante's model apparently in rebuttal of the trilogy of life : Inferno, Purgatory, Paradise.   

 

**********************************

Naomi Greene  Pier Paolo Pasolini : Cinema as Heresy  1990                                                                                         

Oswald Stack  Pasolini on Pasolini  1969                                                                                                       

Sam Rohdie  The Passion of Pier Paolo Pasolini  1995                                                                                 

Enzo Siciliano  Pasolini A Biography 1982                                                                                             

Mauriano Viano A Certain Realism : Making use of Pasolini’s Film Theory and Practice 1993 

Don Ranvaud “Salo or 120 Ways of Remaining Heretical”  Monthly Film Bulletin September 1979                

John D. Rhodes Stupendous, Miserable City : Pasolini’s Rome  2007                                                   

Geoffrey Nowell-Smith “Pasolini’s Originality”  Pier Paolo Pasolini  ed. Paul Willemen  BFI                                                    

Pasolini et al “an Epical-Religious View of the World  Film Quarterly Summer 1965                                             

Bruce Hodsdon  “Mamma Roma and the Conflicted Passions of Pier Paolo Pasolini  CTEQ Annotations Senses of Cinema no 70

 

******************************************

Francesco Rosi 

My first encounter with the third feature of 
Francesco Rosi (1922-2015)Salvatore Guiliano (1961), was at a screening in the mid-sixties on a double bill with John Ford's western Two Rode Together in a near empty cinema midweek in Enmore, an inner Sydney suburb with a then substantial Italian population. Rosi's film (it was very successful in Italy) was being distributed from Melbourne by an Italian importer of feature films to service the post war influx of Italian immigrants, disproportionately from southern Italy. As such, it was not given any kind of release (ironically likely to have been seen to be ‘too political’) in the then expanded number of arthouses in the CBD and screenings for middle and upper middle class audiences in Sydney's more affluent eastern and northern suburbs. In my formative years as a cinephile I had taken to scanning through the cinema listings mainly for atypical screenings of interest such as of Rosi's film. My first viewing of a sub-titled feature film – De Sica's Umberto D (1951) -  at the age of 13 - was at a mid-week “continental film night” introduced c1953 at the local suburban cinema, the programming weighted towards Italian films presumably aiming to attract the growing number of Italian market gardeners and their families from the then nearby semi- rural suburb of North Ryde. BH

Salvatore Guiliano

Rosi's film is not about the Sicilian bandit Salvatore Guiliano. “While something of a media star, he was little more than a puppet dancing to the tune of hidden masters.” This is made clear by the film's original title, Sicily 1943-60. We see Guiliano rarely throughout the film “which focuses instead on the half-perceived forces which controlled him and the island of Sicily. In answer to those who objected that the film is too much of a chronicle, Rosi repeatedly asserted that his film is not a documentary, but a document based on careful, detailed study of the events" surrounding the life and death of Guliano (Testa ed. 9)

Rosi's film shows that the rigorously documented study of an historical and social phenomenon, such as the post-Second World War Sicilian independence movement and its relation to the Mafia, can overcome the traditional distinction between fiction and documentary and create a gripping style that is both individually tragic and historically persuasive, methodologically accurate and psychologically refined. (ibid 3)

In comparing Rosi's film with Visconti's classically slow visual idealisation of Sicily in The Leopard, for example, Pierre Sorlin ('Italian National Cinema') puts it more explicitly:  Rosi does not draw distinctions between the criminals and the victims because Guiliano was paid by those seeking independence for Sicily to murder policemen and by the landlords to murder leftist country people. There were many who wanted him dead. 

Beginning with the discovery of Guiliano's corpse at the beginning, “Rosi's film shows that it is impossible to account for the murder, since the whole structure of Sicilian rural society is more or less involved in it.” Modernist film codes more redolent of a sense of indecisiveness, are effectively used in the film. “Many sequences are interrupted briskly, as if it were impossible to conclude them. The film emphasises its own ambiguity by refusing to offer a clear explanation of events. Rosi suggests “that Sicily cannot be understood on the basis of a simple opposition between backwardness and modernisation and that it is not easy to disentangle a complex system where kinship and patronage prevail over class-based relationships” (Pierre Sorlin, Italian National Cinema, 141).

Hands Over the City  

Although complex, Rosi's second major film Le mani sulli chilla/ Hands Over the City (1963) is a film of “political indictment and social commitment” compared with the ambiguities constituting Salvatore Guiliano's “revolutionary postmodernism.” Grounded in a case of real estate speculation in the context of political corruption in Naples, it is “unquestionably about the morality of power, and as such is an abstract work organised as a debate of ideas. The filmic tale is episodic and constructed by verbal means.” (Manuela Gieri, Testa ed 46). 
 

If prior to Hands Over the City Rosi had any hesitation over the path that had been taken  to overcome neo-realism, with this film his message was loud and clear, and he thereafter continued his work towards the creation  and development  of his own personal interpretation  of realism  by   focusing quite openly on narration, rather than description[..] Asking questions  rather than giving answers is ultimately a strategy  aimed at  building within  the  audience  not  only the capacity to  interpret reality,  but  also  the ability to foresee the effects  of present action on the future (Gieri, ibid 54-5)

Bernando Bertolucci

Bernando Bertolucci
 and Marco Bellocchio were almost two generations behind De Sica, Rossellini and Visconti.  Bertolucci was only 22 when he directed his first feature La commare seca/The Grim Reaper (1962) based on script by his close friend Pier Paolo Pasolini covering similar ground to Pasolini’s Accatone. Bellochio was 25 when directing I pugni in tasca/ Fists in the Pocket  (1965). Their “ideological underpinnings were as far to the left as Pasolini's but [their] cinematic culture abandoned neorealism and drew inspiration from foreign directors, professional training, and assiduous visits to film archives and film clubs” (Bondanella 188). 

Bertolucci freed himself from Pasolini's influence to reveal a personal lyrical style verging on the elegiac in his second feature, the autobiographical Prima della rivoluzione/Before the Revolution (1964), which he referred to as “the confession of a child of our century,” propelled by Fabrizio/Bertoluccui’s  [then] fears and hesitations” (Liehm 193). 

Marco Bellocchio

Bellocchio set his first two films in prosperous, conservative middle class northern towns. Fists in the Pocket, “is angry and provocative rather than elegiac” in attacking the very concept of family itself as well as all its traditional values and myths” (ibid). In analysing a decadent bourgeois family whose physical handicaps underline moral defects, Bellochio takes on the traditional images of family in Italian cinema. He tackles the connection between family and the wider world of politics in China is Near/La Cina è vicina (1967), assembling a group of thoroughly unlikeable characters, including a grotesque and ideologically incoherent provincial family, in satirising the state of cynical compromise between the Christian Democrats and the Socialists in Italian politics.

*********************************************************

Mira Liehm  Passion and Defiance Film in Italy 1942 to the Present  1984                                                                          

Peter Bondanella  Italian Cinema From Neorealism to the Present  2001                                                                                   

P. Adams Sitney  Vital Crises in Italian Cinema  Iconography Stylistics Politics  1995                                                            

Roy Armes Patterns of Realism Italian Neo-Realist Cinema  1971                                                                                                                  

Bruce Hodsdon “The Conflicted Passions of Pasolini”  CTEQ Annotations Senses of Cinema Sept. 2013.                               

Geoffrey Nowell-Smith  “Visconti “ Oxford History of World Cinema G N-S ed 1996 ; Also  Visconti 1973 

Robert Phillip Kolker  Bernado  Bertolucci  BFI Publishing 1985                                                                                                    

Carlo Testa  Poet of Civic Courage The Films of Francesco Rosi 1996 James 

Brown, Great Directors: “Michelangelo Antonioni” Senses of Cinema May 2002                                                                      

Jeremy Carr, Great Directors: “Luchino Visconti” Senses of Cinema June 2018                                                                

Antonio Shanahan, Great Directors: “Frederico Fellini”  Senses of Cinema July 2002                                                                                         

Gino Moliterno, Great Directors:“Pier Paolo Pasolini” Senses of Cinema December 2002  

Gino Moliterno, Great Directors: “Francesco Rosi” Senses of Cinema May 2003

Bibliography for Rossellini attached to 6 (19), for Antonioni to 6 (21) and for Pasolini 6(23)


***********************

Previous entries in this series can be found if you click the following links

 

Sixty Years of International Art Cinema: 1960-2020 - Tables and Directors Lists to Accompany Bruce Hodsdon's Series

 

Notes on canons, methods, national cinemas and more

 

Part One - Introduction

Part Two - Defining Art Cinema

Part Three - From Classicism to Modernism

Part Four - Authorship and Narrative

Part Five - International Film Guide Directors of the Year, The Sight and Sound World Poll, Art-Horror

Part Six (1) - The Sixties, the United States and Orson Welles

Part Six (2) - Hitchcock, Romero and Art Horror

Part Six (3) - New York Film-makers - Elia Kazan & Shirley Clarke  

Part Six (4) - New York Film-makers - Stanley Kubrick Creator of Forms

Part Six (5) ‘New Hollywood’ (1) - Arthur Penn, Warren Beatty, Pauline Kael and BONNIE AND CLYDE

Part Six (6) Francis Ford Coppola: Standing at the crossroads of art and industry

Part 6(7) Altman

6(8) Great Britain - Joseph Losey, Lindsay Anderson, Karel Reisz, Richard Lester, Peter Watkins, Barney Platts-Mills

6(9) France - Part One The New Wave and The Cahiers du Cinema Group

6(10) France - Part Two - The Left Bank/Rive Gauche Group and an Independent

6(11) France - Part Three - Young Godard

6(12) France - Part Four - Godard:Visionary and Rebel

6 (13) France Part 5 Godard with Gorin, Miéville : Searching for an activist voice

6(14) France Part 6 - Creator of Forms - Bresson 

6 (15) France Part 6 - Creator of Forms - Jacques Tati

 6 (16) - Part 6 - Creator of Forms - Carl Th Dreyer

6 (17) - Italy and Luchino Visconti

6(18 - Italy and Roberto Rossellini - Part One

6(19) - Rossellini, INDIA and the new Historical realism

6(20) - Rossellini in Australia

6 (21) - Italy - Michelangelo Antonioni

6 (22) - Italy - Federico Fellini, Ermanno Olmi

Monday, 21 August 2023

Melbourne International Film Festival - Sydney's supercinephile Barrie Pattison ventures south to discover old films by Dario Argento and new films Marco Bellocchio, Catherine Breillat and more.

Editor's Note: The Dario Argento Retrospective reviewed below is also screening weekly on Thursday nights at 7.00 pm at the Randwick Ritz beginning on Thursday 24 August. The Ritz is screening eighteen Argento titles (cf twelve screened at MIFF). Details of the Ritz season, times, dates, bookings etc, which is presented in association with the Italian Institute of Culture, Sydney, may be found IF YOU CLICK HERE

************************

Visiting Melbourne for the first time after the pandemic was revealing, an unwelcome reminder of how far Sydney is falling behind with movies. They still have their Chinatown Twin, ACMI’s pretend Cinémathèque and their IMAX theatre which was playing Oppenheimer in the format said to be unique in the Southern Hemisphere. Not only did they have the venues but an audience which would fill them up. Breaks your heart really.


The incentive was the Melbourne International Film Festival, which had some of the material I’d missed in Sydney and a Dario Argento (above) retrospective.  That one was a reminder of researching “The Seal of Dracula” in the days of Paul Naschy, Hitchcock rip-offs, Phantom of the Paradise and the European Fantastic Film Festivals. 

Time was Argento was my favorite filmmaker. I once found myself with a single night in Paris and three hundred plus films to choose from. Agonising! I was still under the spell of Suspiria, which had revealed Argento as the Federico Fellini of the splatter film and was banned in Australia while the rights were held by an independent distributor. Three weeks after the rights passed to Fox, it would open with a twenty second censor cut.  But that is another story.

Deep Red

I elected for Argento’s Profondo Rosso/ Deep Red, the film he made before that. Good choice as it turned out, probably his best work - a mix of sensation and style that was right on my wavelength. That and Suspiria were in the MIFF season. Not always easy to find, the director’s other works generally fail to match those peaks but they are all recognisably from the same hands. In addition, the MIFF showings came via the Instituto Italiano di cultura which meant modern restorations - not always a good thing  but no faded, cut and worn film prints, along with original Italian language sound and English subtitles.

The tracks were an interesting study in themselves. On show, Argento’s second film, the 1971  Il gatto a nove code/Cat O' Nine Tails belongs to the hundred percent post synch era of Italian film and is particularly distracting - we open with Sergio Graziani’s Italian-speaking voice issuing from a blue-eyed Karl Malden’s lips. James Franciscus is better voiced by long-time dubbing actor Pino Colizzi. The lack of background ambiance is obvious, with only odd footsteps and vehicles added in. It’s early days for Morricone but his score has to do the heavy lifting.  

Karl Malden, James Franciscus, Cat of Nine Tails

Nine Tails 
was the one that gave Argento his least satisfaction. It opens promisingly with blind man Malden out walking on the street with his young niece Cinzia De Carolis, in front of the suburban Terzi Institute for Biological Intelligence. He overhears a suspicious conversation from a parked car (his enhanced hearing is a plot point) & has the girl describe the men in the vehicle they have just passed.

Being Argento Giallo, there’s a sinister figure break-in at the institute, where they can’t work out what’s been taken, and murders accumulate. Carlo Alighiero, one of their scientists, is shoved off a Metro platform to be cut in half by a train. The police now interview the Institute personnel (suspects!) including Terzi Director Tino Carraro’s glamorous daughter Catharine Spaak, in ridiculous fetishistic outfits. She and Franciscus make out but that doesn’t go well when James becomes suspicious about her reluctance to drink from the tetrahedron milk packs the villain has poisoned with a hypodermic - customary Hitchcock reference. Malden heard Spaak fingering the gold watch chain round her neck and deduces that the incriminating information in her medallion has been missed by the police, before her garrotted body was buried with it in the family vault.

Turns out that what was stolen was a file with the chromosome structure of one of the board, showing the homicidal tendencies the institute is studying cf. the 1952 British The Brain Machine. The charts on the institute walls resemble Malden’s Braille puzzle table - Argento conspicuous decoration like Spaak’s squid pattern wallpaper.  

The murderer abducts Malden’s niece and ties her up in a rat-infested room, so the amateur investigator duo appoint themselves tomb robbers and break into the Terzi mausoleum. We get the already characteristic sequence when Franciscus finds himself locked in with his burglar kit inadequate to secure his escape, till the door opens to show Malden with blood dripping off his white stick, which proves to be a sword cane.

The rooftop chase finale is an anti-climax after this, though hands gripping the lift cables got a great yuk reaction from the audience.

Adriano Celentano, The Five Days

MIFF also aired Argento’s next film Le cinque giornate/The Five Days/The Five Days of Milan declaring it an Australian premiere, which is a bit of a liberty. I saw it several times when it was a staple of the Italian language circuit in the seventies, presumably playing to the immense following of Singer Star TV personality Adriano Celantano. (they say his on-air recommendation was instrumental in returning Berlusconi) He makes an uncharacteristically glum lead here.

A historical spectacle set against the 1848 Milan rising against the Austrian occupation, where Adriano has been jailed. A cannonball breaching the prison wall sets him free. He finds himself partnering with baker Enzo Cerusico in a series of disturbing adventures - conscripted into the dotty, murderous militia, assisting at a child birth and finding that even with the power shift they are still at the bottom of the social order. This was the first time I heard the phrase “Siamo fregata!”

The Five Days is not altogether well served by Argento’s taste for the weird and grisly - a lot of close-up bayonetting and blasting point-blank with early firearms. The final killing of the German, seen only as yellow hair thrown up in slow motion, as he is shot in front of his young mistress, comes with the eerie search of the degenerate’s house by the looting pair, that’s getting closer to Fellini. 

These striking images are coaxed out of a limited budget and there are attempts at
innovation, like playing only the sound of the baby over the cavalry charge. Marilu
Tolo does another of her vigorous, sexy turns here. Dario’s producer dad had set up The Five Days for Nanni Loy, in the wake of his imposing 1962 The Four Days of
Naples
. Apparently unsuccessful, The Five Days was eventually director, the younger Argento’s, one departure from his giallos

The MIFF dozen film line-up also included Argento’s debut The Bird with the Crystal Plumage, his 1971 Four Flies on Grey Velvet with Hollywood starlet Mimsy Farmer become sex sensation after displaying her new nose in Barbet Schroder’s More, 1971’s Deep Red , Suspiria 1977, Tenebrae (1982) offering Anthony Franciosa menaced by straight razors, Phenomena (1985) which puts a teenage Jenifer Connolly in the path of a serial killer, The Black Cat from the two part TV Two Evil Eyes (1990), Opera where Palma’s Phantom allies with killer ravens, a 1998 Phantom of the Opera with Julian Sands having sex with rats. While not complete (none of his imposing pre-director scripts were on show) this selection was extensive enough to confirm the impression of  sex, style and violence which made his work attention getting but finally limited.

Do You Like  Hitchcock?00

One I hadn’t previously been able to see, despite my best efforts and a European retrospective, was Argento’s 2005’s Ti piace Hitchcock?/Do You Like Hitchcock?, the first entry in a TV Hitchcock-themed series. The reduced budget shows mainly in having Elio Germani the only familiar face, in an Argento film without an imported star. The technicians are A-feature guys including musician Pino Donaggio.

Here we get giallo black gloves that don’t leave prints, La finestra di fronte, delito per delito like Strangers on a Train. The Hitchcock citations also run to extreme close-ups - the lift mechanism locking, the close-up of the lit cigarette end, the keys in the tumbler.

In this one, then young Germani is a film student, the sole example in movies who takes notes, even if he uses a wide-screen TV that crops Der Golem. He’s also a voyeur, watching the action in the downstairs flat from his windows. Of course, he sees a murder there.

He falls out with fetching lady friend Cristina Brondo (the one featured female not to go topless in this one) who deserts his bed, with him dumping her effects into the street bin where the bag lady scoops them into her shopping trolley. Elio sets out to investigate. He steals the victim’s bank statement, revealing a million lire inheritance and gets into the crime scene, when the char lady is busy mopping up the blood. Her supervisor buys Elio’s claim to be a reporter (again) and wants to know which paper he’ll be able to read his own name in.

When our hero is left in charge of the neighbourhood video shop, a large poster of Argento’s Il cartaio/The Card Player is prominent. Elio gets into the store computer to find the details of blonde downstairs tenant Chiara Conti, just as she comes in, with some scrambling to clear the screen before she sees her own details there. Her showing interest in her cute neighbor upsets proprietor-admirer Iván Morales.

Determined to penetrate the imbroglio, Germani hops on his moped to follow Conti’s car to work and, using his binoculars, sees her being groped by her bald realtor boss. Here the growing storm sounds are effective, as we get to the Argento set piece. Germani climbs the plants on the building where the lowlife takes the girl and is spotted, falling and injuring his knee. Unchaining the moped, which he has to side saddle,  he flees the vengeful boss through belting rain.

In full Rear Window mode, Brondo comes back to care for Germani, his leg in plaster. Plausibility takes a pounding with an attempt to add two more climaxes - a graphic near drowning and the black hoody he saw through his peephole door re-appearing, putting Brondo in jeopardy. 

It doesn’t really matter who the killer is and the nudity is gratuitous but Argento has clearly hit his stride by this one. MIFF has a history of adventurous Cinémathèque quality retrospectives - Tomu Uchida and Jean Epstein! Add Argento to their welcome break from endless Ozu and Bergman.

Short films, often a strength of these, were disappointing this time out but the event was a chance to pick up on films I’d missed in the Sydney festival.


Intriguingly one (the one?) survivor, from the days of cinema reverence and cult status for the Godards and Bergmans, is Marco Bellocchio (above), who at age eighty-three has offered what may be his best work, the new Rapito/Kidnapped, a film with ferocious anti-Catholicism (compare the director’s 1971 Nel nome del padre) which would have made it unscreenable through a large part of its director’s life - and mine. Bellocchio’s work has not always been readily available, with a wide range of subject matter and style. The films which seem to have proved most acceptable to distribution chains tend to be his intense Italian History pieces like the 2009 Mussolini film Vincere and the 2003 Aldo Moro  Buongiorno, notte/Good Morning Night but those were set closer to our own time.

This one takes place during the unification of  Italy and is played in painting-like compositions of costumed performers in historic settings, filmed without fill light so that the story seems to be engulfed in the shadows of history.

In 1857 Bologna, the constables come for Enea Sala, the six-year-old son of a rich Jewish family, claiming that his secret baptism makes him eternally a Christian, who must be removed from their control. No question of balancing here. The Jews are uniformly noble in bearing the persecutions visited upon them by Catholics, who are uniformly malicious whether through conviction or convenience. “Worse than the Pharoah” the boy’s mother, Barbara Ronchi says of Inquisitor Fabrizio Gifuni.

Young Sala is transferred to the Vatican and the company of a number of other reclaimed children, who coach him into going along with the gag to facilitate his return to his family, though he still repeats the Scherma Israel each night. Paolo Pierobon’s Pope Pius makes a personal project of the boys, while Fausto Russo Alesi the father, always in forced deference, pleads for his release. The mechanics of this campaign generates the film’s suspense and its interest. We wait for the factions invoked to act - the Rothschilds, who hold Vatican debts large enough to destroy the Church, worldwide opinion mobilised by the press to the point of possible intervention. In the face-to-face meeting between Pierobon and Alesi, the Pontiff is enraged that even the Catholic papers have been approached to urge the father’s case.

The boy’s brainwashing proceeds with two vivid lapses. The first, where Ronchi has been granted a visit and her son acts with instructed composure only to rush back to his mother’s arms as the emotion becomes too strong. Approaching the film’s end, the character, now played by Leonardo Maltese, from the Amelio 2022 Il signore delle formiche/Lord of the Ants, is part of the Pope’s funeral cortege on the way to his tomb when the mob surges over them screaming “Throw the pig in the Tiber” a chant into which he finds himself drawn.

These bursts of hysterics are uncharacteristic of the film’s grim, measured content, which includes now trainee priest Maltese called upon to use his tongue to inscribe the sign of the cross on the marble floor three times to atone to Pierobon. We also get the aging Pope’s vision of the newspaper cartoon of Jewish invaders circumcising him come to life and the scene of a wooden Jesus descending from the cross - second time this week - after The New Boy.

With the 1870 loss of the Papal states to Risorgimento troops with feathers in their hats, who break down the walls to rescue Maltese, inquisitor Gifuni is put on trial providing the film’s most intriguing and unique material, as details of the abduction and it’s likely bogus basis are tested in court.

It’s rare to find a film, where issues are central, holding attention so well. Most of the cast have been around for years without drawing our attention, which gives them the double value of experience and a lack of previous associations. They and the technicians are on top of their game. The viewer’s own belief structure is likely to fog any message content but it can’t be a bad thing to put a  work of such intense scrutiny into circulation.


Back again after a decade, L'été dernier/Last Summer looks a vintage offering from Catherine Breillat (above), once poster lady for transgressive film. We get elegant lawyer Léa Drucker briefing a teenage girl rape victim on the rough spots she faces in her legal action. This suggests the creator of 36 Fillette Blue Beard is going to deliver a smart, in character social drama. However before long, we find we’re in for a retread of Phaedra, via a Danish 2019 Trine Dyrholme movie.

We learn about childless Drucker, victim of a youthful misadventure, now in a super respectable marriage with Olivier Rabourdin, that runs to an explicit make-out scene. The pair have adopted two young Asian girls. However, Rabourdin’s teenage son by his first marriage, Samuel Kircher, is already having brushes with the law. A laboured bit of business with the kids’ keychain gift establishes his guilt in a break-in at the family home.

Léa warns him to shape up or else and that goes implausibly well, with Sam swimming with the girls on a picnic and doubling Léa on his motor scooter away from the boring gathering (OK extended traveling shot) to the livelier surroundings of a local boite. It’s not long before the two get into a sustained double close-up lip lock and a bit of “No, we shouldn’t.” They represent the contrast of the Pill Generation and the AIDs Generation. Developments like sister Clotilde Coreau catching the guilty couple or Kircher’s illicit dictaphone recordings, don’t go anywhere interesting.

On his time out together with dad Rabourdin, the kid dobs Léa in and the best the movie can come up with is Léa po faced denying it. They go to court, with her getting the kind of legal bruising that we’ve seen her describe, and paying out big.

The marriage survives and she’s back naked in the sack with Rabourdin, when the doorbell rings and Kircher is downstairs drunk...

Neither the cast or the handling are able to generate conviction and this one has to be rated a disappointment.

Art College 1994 

Jian Lu’s unexpected Chinese feature cartoon Art College 1994 is off-putting at first, with its literal, shading-free visuals and lip-synch characters.  The opening with the cartoon beetle failing to climb a wall suggests an imagery which will only dot the work - a butterfly, an insect on a diner plate, a distant flying crane.  What this one foregrounds is student characters lost in the familiar confusion of demanding what is art - Marcel Duchamp’s urinal, Andy Warhol, is the moon more beautiful than a board? One dissatisfied boy burns his drawings to be copied by another hailing it as an aesthetic statement. “Is it art because I say so?”  - all here amplified by China’s uneasy entry into the Market Economy, which introduces engulfing Western ideas, in streets dotted with Golden Arches and Superman the Movie posters. Their traditional painting instructor in a Mao Jacket promotes their Asian heritage and the bridge of Light still rates a visit. 
.
We start off with boys with haircuts done by their chums, from the dorms where the walls are decorated with posters of Rambo and The Chairman.  A pair are facing discipline for having roughed up one of their fellows, who disfigured their work. They discuss what to do with a Tracy Ermin exhibit, where only the bed can be recycled. A warden tells them not to sit on the art. One student doesn’t want to create, planning on becoming an entrepreneur. Somewhere in there, we get the killer Picasso quote “A good artist borrows from other artists. A great artist steals from other artists.” 

The leads become involved with the two girl music students, whose ambition is to give a concert together. There is a surprisingly relatable scene where they mimic the voice delivery of old dubbed Chinese movies. The glamorous one will quit to become a club singer while her plain friend’s mother has set up a meeting with the tailored student from an Ivy League university, where he studies French. He invites them all to dinner and the boys hog themselves at the buffet, in surroundings that contrast with their own grubby building, with its bunk beds and pink-painted steel window frames. 

I couldn’t help thinking about the presentations I used to do with the murky nineties Russian Agfacolor School for Beauty Appreciation two-reeler touting the slab concrete building with steel pipe chairs as surroundings from which we were told works of great artistry could only emerge.

It is remarkable that the crudely drawn characters lost in unexceptional lives become so involving. They have been voiced by home territory celebrities whose names don’t register here. Finally relating the subsequent lives, American Graffiti style, over snaps, given life by animating their still photo texture, is extraordinarily moving. I rate the film as the best I’ve seen from China since the second Wolf Warrior - maybe before. It has yet to open in its intended market.