Showing posts with label Irene Dunne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Irene Dunne. Show all posts

Saturday, 29 January 2022

On Blu-ray - David Hare rejoices at the rebirth of LOVE AFFAIR (Leo McCarey, USA, 1939)

Charles Boyer

The images above and below are from Leo McCarey's glorious and long lost 1939 Love Affair.

New 4K scan and restoration to Blu-ray from Lobster Films and MoMA.
While the release of this "lost" film, is extremely welcome, you shouldn't be expecting to see an image quality at the level of the best Warner Archive work under George Feltenstein and the MPI team there.
The new Lobster is clean, delicious and detailed enough to finally make out what's happening on the screen. The history of the film elements is typical but always interesting. Basically when Fox picked up the rights to remake it (virtually shot for shot) in 1957 as An Affair to Remember, they trashed the original RKO o-neg and prime elements which they inherited from the property deal and with RKO now legally deceased. Subsequently one could only see Love Affair in battered, faded 16mm prints of varying degrees of awfulness from TV syndication prints and worse. 

My own copy came from a Channel 7 midday movie screening taken from a 16mm kept in someone's garage. I haven't looked at it since I dubbed my VHS to DVD-R twenty plus years ago. 

Irene Dunne, Charles Boyer

The restorers here took on an all too similar situation to Sony/Columbia with it's recent restoration of Cukor's 1938 Holiday which Criterion released last year. Once again there Grover Crisp's team had a duplicate nitrate neg and various 35mm safety positives including a fine grain (a good quality reference but not projectable positive print variously known as a "lavender") from which the technicians can rework a new interpositive or something close. 

Sony delivered the results after 4K scanning with the decision to let through virtually un-mangled as much grain as possible from the new 4K master. It's a grain level that was not uncommon in the history of movies but nowadays it's a difficult sell to modern audience used to digital cleanup.
With Love Affair, Lobster and MoMA were faced with the decision to either go with the grain or massage the image back. They took the latter decision which is both cheaper (much lower bitrate and grading costs) and understandable and the result is a very serviceable and pleasing disc image and audio, with very light grain but considerable softening through the grain removal. 



Happily the DVNR never creates waxiness. It's up to you whether you like this or would have preferred a much grainier and still less than perfect first generation positive distribution print quality. Given the circumstances these days around sackings, studio Archival reductions, cost cutting and worse, I think Lobster has taken a sensible path. If money were no object, this might have come out of the works looking "better". As it is Love Affair looks "Good" and often "very good". And most importantly it gets the title back into the public eye, for which I salute the film, Lobster and MoMA without reservation.

Sunday, 24 January 2021

On Blu-ray - David Hare rejoices in the Lobster Films/MoMA restoration of Leo McCarey's LOVE AFFAIR (USA 1939)


The screens are of Charles Boyer and Irene Dunne in Leo McCarey's glorious and long lost 1939 Love Affair.

New 4K scan and restoration to Blu-ray from Lobster Films and MoMA.

While the release of this "lost" film, is extremely welcome, you shouldn't be expecting to see an image quality at the level of the best Warner Archive work under George Feltenstein and the MPI team there.

The new Lobster is clean, delicious and detailed enough to finally make out what's happening on the screen. 

The history of the film elements is typical but always interesting. Basically when Fox picked up the rights to remake it (virtually shot for shot) in 1957 as An Affair to Remember, they trashed the original RKO o-neg and prime elements which they inherited from the property deal, with RKO now legally deceased. Subsequently one could only see Love Affair in battered, faded 16mm prints of varying degrees of awfulness from TV syndication prints and worse. 


My own copy came from a Channel 7 midday movie screening taken from such a 16mm kept in someone's garage. I haven't looked at it since I dubbed my VHS to DVD-R twenty plus years ago.

The restorers here took on an all too similar situation to Sony/Columbia with it's recent restoration of Cukor's 1938 Holiday which Criterion released last year. Once again Grover Crisp's team there had a duplicate nitrate neg and various 35mm safety positives including a fine grain (a good quality reference but not projectable positive print variously known as a "lavender") from which the technicians can rework a new interpositive or something close. 

Sony delivered the results after 4K scanning with the decision to let through virtually un-mangled as much grain as possible from the new 4K master. It's a grain level that was not uncommon in the history of movies but nowadays it's a difficult sell to modern audience used to digital cleanup.  

With Love Affair, Lobster and MoMA were faced with the decision to either go with the grain or massage the image back. They took the latter decision which is both cheaper (much lower bitrate and grading costs) and understandable and the result is a very serviceable and pleasing disc image and audio, with very light grain but considerable softening through the grain removal. 



Happily the DVNR never creates waxiness. It's up to you whether you like this or would have preferred a much grainier and still less than perfect first generation positive distribution print quality.  

Given the circumstances these days around sackings, studio Archival reductions, cost cutting and worse, I think Lobster has taken a sensible path. If money were no object, this might have come out of the works looking "better". As it is Love Affair looks "Good" and often "very good". And most importantly it gets the title back into the public eye, for which I salute it without reservation.

Saturday, 8 August 2020

On DVD (and streaming) - Tom Ryan retrieves a lesser-known Rouben Mamoulian musical HIGH, WIDE AND HANDSOME (USA, 1937)

Set in 1859 and based on real-life events that followed the discovery of oil in rural Titusville, Pennsylvania, High, Wide and Handsome is a winning Paradise-lost musical written for the screen by Jerome Kern (music) and Oscar Hammerstein II (lyrics). Hammerstein and George O’Neil (Only Yesterday, Magnificent Obsession, Intermezzo) are officially responsible for the screenplay, although it underwent some major uncredited revisions by director Rouben Mamoulian.

Rouben Mamoulian
The film has been generally reduced to a footnote in histories of the musical, cast in the shadow of Mamoulian’s major work in the genre (Applause, Love Me Tonight, Summer Holiday, Silk Stockings) (1). That said, it hasn’t been entirely ignored: in a programme note for London’s National Film Theatre, Richard Roud enthuses about it as “an extraordinary fusion of Brecht and Broadway” (2); Clive Hirschhorn sees it as “one of the screen’s few really worthwhile musical Westerns” (3); Douglas McVay suggests that Mamoulian directs it “with far more style than he shows in Love Me Tonight” (4); Jeanine Basinger sees it as indicating that “Mamoulian is a major force in mixing the sense of realism available to movies into a musical format” (5); and, in his discussion of folk musicals in his excellent book on the genre, Rick Altman rates it very highly (6).

Randolph Scott and Irene Dunne take the leads, an unlikely couple, at least at first glance. They’d been an on-screen couple once before, in William A. Seiter’s Astaire-Rogers musical, Roberta (1935), although there they’d been the secondary love interest. Not exactly providing comic relief, but certainly serving as a contrast to the central couple’s graceful, meant-for-each-other togetherness. 

Irene Dunne, Randolph Scott
Here, though, they’re the main act (with Dunne featuring above the title and Scott immediately below). He’d played the lead in a number of low-budget Zane Grey-adaptations earlier in the 1930s, but was still a few years away from the stardom that he acquired through a host of westerns. She was fresh from her role in Hammerstein’s Show Boat (another folk musical, which she’d also played on stage), and The Awful Truth (1937) was waiting in the wings. 

Scott plays Pennsylvania farmer Peter Cortlandt, an upright small town citizen who falls in love with chanteuse Sally Watterson (Dunne), the “snippy” daughter of a travelling snake-oil salesman (Raymond Walburn). The adjective comes, approvingly, from Peter’s farm-workers. After events conspire to bring them together under the watchful eye of his endearingly feisty grandmother (Elizabeth Patterson), their wedding day coincides with the discovery of oil on the Cortlandt farm and their Eden is transformed into a much more modern environment. “Now you can have everything you want,” rejoices Peter. 

As Sally’s gorgeous song, “The Folks Who Live on the Hill" (click for a glimpse on YouTube), gives way to the sounds of the well exploding and the idyllic, blossom-covered rural surrounds are drenched in the spouting oil, the romance of the film’s early scenes evolves into a very different kind of story. Innocence gives way to a harsh reality as Sally is effectively nudged into the background and Peter battles to prevent the rights of the local community from being usurped by the might of Eastern money. She eventually returns, but only when she implicitly agrees to play the game according to the rules the men around her have dictated.
Scott, Dunne - The Folks Who Live on the Hill

The conflict is the same as the one underpinning many westerns, as well as Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life (1946), pitting the “little man” against the forces that threaten to make him irrelevant. It’s essentially a case of Good Capitalism (the one that caters for all the people) colliding with Bad Capitalism (the one that has been commandeered by a greedy few). Walter Brennan (Alan Hale), the jovially cold-hearted railway boss plans to freeze the landowners out by forcing them to pay exorbitant rates to have their oil transported for refining. This is Bad Capitalism. “All it amounts to is plain, everyday stealing,” Peter protests when Brennan proposes a deal with him behind his neighbours’ backs: “A few men stealing from a lot o’ men.” Brennan tells him he’s right: “That happens to be a pretty good definition of business.” 

With Mamoulian’s camera tracing a graceful arc around the communal rituals that define the world of Titusville, High, Wide and Handsome is a classic tale of a Garden of Eden being tainted by the Original Sin of Big Business. And, after the coming of oil, it’s clear that it’s going to be impossible to turn back the clock. But there are serpents in this Eden even before the derrick spews forth its black gold. Most prominent among them are the puritans led by Red Scanlon (Charles Bickford), hostile to those of a more liberal mindset (like Peter and his family), brutal in their treatment of outsiders, and hypocritical in their misogyny. It’s remarkable how often the seeds of discontent in American films (and in American life generally, both before and after the Civil War) grow within its own borders. And there’s no law officer in sight to keep the peace in Titusville.

Dunne, Scott (with curls)
Akim Tamiroff
Even at the end, after Peter, Sally and the community as a whole have expelled Brennan and all who lent their support to him, including the wretched Red, one is still left with a sense of loss. As part of the strategy of building a pipeline to challenge the railroad’s control over the farmers’ destiny, Peter had agreed to sell the little hill to an avaricious entrepreneur (Akim Tamiroff). Even though he’d promised Sally that their home and their future would be built on it." Peter’s decision has estranged her and she leaves him because of it. She’s back at the end, when he needs help, and she’s by his side after their victory in the final sequence, but nothing has changed. Even the film seems to have forgotten the hill and the broken promise.

While the vivacious Dunne is perfect for her role, Scott doesn’t seem altogether comfortable as Peter. At first, before the tensions explode, he’s at ease as the country boy: a hard-working farmer, a righteous gentleman defending a lady’s honour, appealingly comic in his awkwardness as a suitor. But when he’s required to plead his case and persuade the townspeople to stand with him, he’s less convincing. Scott’s strong, silent persona is that of a man who delivers the goods as a doer rather than a demagogue. But the actor seems ill-fitted to the demeanour of the character he’s playing, and the bizarre curling that afflicts his hair at various points in the film doesn’t help.

At this point in his career, Scott is still an actor in search of a place in the scheme of things: playing opposite or alongside stars, male (Grant, Astaire) or female (Dunne, Carole Lombard, Mae West), or juvenile (Shirley Temple). Sometimes he’s at home there (especially with Temple), but, viewed in retrospect, it appears that the qualities that were to make him a star, especially a star in westerns (from the Zane Grey adaptations through to his melancholic farewell, Guns in the Afternoon), are being repressed and, to a greater or lesser degree, he’s being forced into roles that don’t give him sufficient room to move.

1.   see for example Jim Hillier and Douglas Pye’s 100 Film Musicals, pp. 132, 226
2.   cited in Tom Milne, Mamoulian, p. 106
3.   Douglas McVay, The Musical Film, p. 25
4.   Clive Hirschhorn, The Hollywood Musical, p. 132
5.   Jeanine Basinger, The Movie Musical, p. 70
6.   Rick Altman, The American Film Musical, pp. 272 - 327

Editor's Note: An unrestored copy of High, Wide and Handsome is streaming free If you click here