Showing posts with label Pre-code. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pre-code. Show all posts

Sunday, 10 May 2026

At CINEMA REBORN - CJ Johnson's introduction to the Sydney screening of ONE HOUR WITH YOU (Ernst Lubitsch, USA, 1932

Editor's Note: CJ Johnson has introduced a number of films at our Cinema Reborn seasons. CJ has been a resident critic on ABC radio since 2008 and lectures on cinema at the Art Gallery of NSW. In October he will be leading a tour presented by the AGNSW to the Lumière Film Festival in Lyon and participants will have the opportunity to discover the birthplace of cinema and attend one of the cinematic world’s most prestigious annual events. Experience highlights of the week-long Lumière Film Festival, one of the largest international festivals of classic cinema, in Lyon, home of the Cinematograph and where cinema was born. Wander through the Musée Lumière and learn about the Lumière brothers, the fathers of cinema and inventors of the revolutionary camera and projector. Enjoy day trips to the surrounding countryside, with its rolling vineyards and charming medieval villages.

  • Attend the internationally renowned Lumière Film Festival in Lyon, the cradle of cinematic history.

  • Visit the Musée Lumière and discover the various inventions of the Lumiere brothers, the fathers of cinema.

  • Uncover the secrets of filmmaking at the Musée Cinéma et Miniature.

 Click here for more information  

Renaissance Tours 
Tel 1300 727 095 
info@renaissancetours.com.au

ONE HOUR WITH YOU has encore screenings at the Ritz Cinemas Randwick and the Lido Cinemas Hawthorn on Wednesday 13 May at 11.00 am. Tickets available at the door of both cinemas. Just click on the cinemas names to go through if you wish to book in advance.

*************************************


Two years ago I had the great pleasure of introducing Mitchell Leisen’s delightful screwball comedy Midnight, from 1939, for Cinema Reborn, and when I did I questioned, and attempted to answer, why Leisen was not remembered, watched and celebrated in the same way that Preston Sturges, Billy Wilder and Ernst Lubitsch continue to be. Self-evidently, I don’t need to answer that question about Lubitsch. Lubitsch is the sex comedy OG. 

For those of you who weren’t into early 90s Gangsta Rap, ‘OG’ means “Original Gangster”, which you might translate as ‘first great pioneer.’ The OG doesn’t need to have invented the artistic form in question, but rather to have been the earliest pioneer of most defining impact. There is no doubt that, for sex comedy, and romantic and screwball comedy, worldwide, that was Lubitsch. Here’s the thing: with many art forms, once the OG has set the basic template, the artists in their wake tend first to imitate, then build upon, the OG style. Gangsta rap changed radically over the years, from an upbeat party sound to a grittier, more autobiographical, and ultimately brutally violent record of Black American urban life. It grew more radical. 

But the OG of sex and romantic and screwball comedy, Ernst Lubitsch, brought the radical from the get-go. Instead of future practitioners pushing the boundaries of the form, Lubitsch’s followers evolved towards the mainstream, to the point that, ultimately, screwball died off, and sex comedy absolutely died off, leaving the much more middle-of-the-road form of Romantic Comedy as the enduring legacy. Lubitsch’s work was both the pioneering and the radical forms of itself, and very few have managed to match it for its subversive, ground-breaking, rule-breaking joie de vivre

Lubitsch really went to town in 1932 and 1933, for he gave us today’s film in 1932, followed in 1933 by Design for Living, the greatest movie ever made about thrupples. Thrupples, for those who may not be aware, are romantic partnerships of three people. Design for Living is about a thrupple. It ends with Miriam Hopkins in the back of a limousine with her two loves, Frederick March and Gary Cooper. They’re heading off into their fabulous new life together. First, she deeply kisses March, then she turns her head and deeply kisses Cooper. Then they all smile and giggle before the screen fades to black. They’re off to have a good time. 

We can have a good time thinking about their good time, even though most of us would find it tricky to emulate in real life. Jack Thompson did, and not only that, he did it with two sisters, for fifteen years. Lubitsch would have loved that. He could have made a very funny film based on that. In Lubitschland, thrupples are funny! 

While Design for Living pushed sexual and societal norms, One Hour With You also pushed filmmaking ones. From the very first scene, which isn’t a song but is spoken in rhyme, this film stands out as radical. When a Parisian police chief instructs his officers in rhyme, something is up. There aren’t that many rules yet and Lubitsch is simultaneously creating and breaking them. The very next scene, he takes another rule - don’t look at the camera - and smashes it. He allows Maurice Chevalier to turn to camera and speak directly to us, the audience. In Chevalier’s hands it feels natural; indeed, he’d done it a few times before with Lubitsch, and it wouldn’t be the last time: famously, 26 years later, Chevalier opens Gigi the same way, extolling the virtues of grooming little girls so that when they come of age you can be ready to pounce. 


Chevalier has always been cast as the classy sleaze, and that’s his role here. His opening monologue to camera, broken down, is basically saying, “Can you believe how young and hot my wife is? My god, I have to tell you, I love sleeping with her and I do it as much as I can.” His wife is played by Jeanette McDonald, who was 29 to Chevalier’s 44, so you can appreciate his enthusiasm. It’s not the world’s biggest age difference, and 
 certainly not by Hollywood standards, but it’s enough for the policeman in the park scene to assume, and assume very confidently, that these two could not be husband and wife. 

So about that park scene, the second in the film, right after the police chief instructs his officers in rhyme: let’s decode it, let’s all get on the same page, which is to say, on Lubitsch’s page. The police chief, at the beginning of the film, after reminding his cops that the tourists who flock to Paris are coming for one thing and one thing only - sex - instructs them to basically let all the tourists get away with whatever they want, except for making love in the parks after dark. It seems the fabled Parisian cafés are losing customers once night falls, because they’re all going off to root in the bushes, and it’s up to the constabulary to root them out of the bushes and back into the cafés. So in the next scene, the cops do exactly that. 

The production code, that hideous studio agreement designed to appease the Catholic League of Decency and keep federal government censorship at bay, was created in 1930 but barely enforced until 1934. This self-muzzling set of restrictions is the reason that the rest of the world, watching American movies made between 1934 and about 1960, thought that American married couples slept in separate beds or even bedrooms, that there was no interracial romance, that there were no homosexuals except self-loathing or homicidal ones, that people didn’t bleed when they got shot, that nobody swore or blasphemed, that adults wore pyjamas, that all adultery ended in punishment, and that nobody went to the toilet. (It’s true - Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho in 1960 was the first American mainstream release to show a toilet bowl.) 

Films released in 1932, like One Hour With You, are considered ‘pre-code’, which allowed them a great degree of naughtiness but not, perhaps, some of the explicit imagery of the silent era. One Hour With You is pure pre-code; just as Design for Living is a celebration of the joy of threesomes, so too One Hour With You is a hearty endorsement of adultery. In this film, it doesn’t wreck your marriage, it makes it more fun. But that doesn’t mean that Lubitsch was able or willing to show a parkfull of grunting fornicators, so he encoded it. When the cops raid the park, what you’ll see on screen is a lot of couples making out on park benches. But what Lubitsch wants you to see in your mind’s eye is those same couples gleefully humping al fresco. So have that locked and loaded, and make it as filthy as you like. That’s what Lubitsch would want you to do. 

This is a film that is completely, unashamedly, joyously about one thing: sex. It’s about sex in the park and sex with your wife and sex with your wife’s best friend. Credits. Indeed, the key to having the most fun with Lubitsch is simply to remember this: every time you think you’re hearing a dirty double-entendre, you are hearing a dirty double-entendre, and in any given moment, vocal inflection, cutaway shot or simple gesture you can decipher a possible sexual metaphor: bang! You’re right on the money. Every possible lewd interpretation is the right interpretation. That’s part of the Lubitsch touch! 


Marurice Chevalier was all about sex. His persona was very clearly established in the public’s perception as ‘randy Frenchman’. In one of his previous collaborations with Lubitsch and leading lady Jeanette McDonald, The Love Parade - 1929 - his character is a diplomat who has to be reprimanded by The Queen because he’s been bonking everyone at the Embassy including the Ambassador’s wife. Then, right before One Hour With You, Lubitsch directed him in The Smiling Lieutenant, which may as well have been called The Horny Lieutenant. That film, full of Chevalier winking
 and raising his eyebrows before walking into ladies' bedrooms, was Paramount’s biggest hit in 1931, and Chevalier’s reputation as a lascivious continental was truly cemented. 

All of which is important to know to fully appreciate what’s going on in One Hour With You. Chevalier’s speech directly to the audience at the beginning of the film is a big in-joke. The subtext, which would have been clear to all audiences in 1932, was that Chevalier was a man who was always on the make, regardless of anyone’s marital status, so his declaration that he was married, deeply in love with his wife and enjoying plenty of monogamous sex with her, was risible, an ironic metatextual gag. “Chevalier? Married and monogamous? Pah! Pull the other one!” That’s the set-up. We know that’s not his true character and in a way, we’re now put into the position of waiting for him to be tested. It doesn’t take long. But in the early stages of the film, as he valiantly tries to resist the allures of the extremely eager Mitzi, the fact that this is Chevalier, the man who cannot resist the primal urge, raises the comedic stakes. It would be like opening a film with W.C. Fields claiming that he had gone sober and then locking him into an unattended liquor store overnight. 

Chevalier’s trademark was a straw boater hat and bow tie, and the fact that he wears these accoutrements in the film, as he did in most of his films, makes it even clearer that we’re meant to bring our Chevalier baggage with us into the movie. Like W.C. Fields, Charlie Chaplin, Harold Lloyd, the Marx Brothers and others, although Chevalier plays different characters in his different films, he is also always playing ‘Maurice Chevalier’, and ‘Maurice Chevalier’ is a lecherous horndog. That was his reputation in real life, too: Jeanette McDonald called him ‘the quickest derrière pincher in Hollywood’.  

Supposedly, and certainly to do with that derrière-pinching, Chevalier and McDonald did not get along too well, but you’d never know it from their four films together. They had fabulous on-screen chemistry, and that is integral to One Hour With You. We can believe that these two are enjoying a good marriage and are attracted to each other romantically and sexually, and that makes the dramatic and comic tension of Chevalier’s almost inevitable philandering all the stronger. That, and the fact that we don’t want to see McDonald get hurt. Her Colette is the most sympathetic, likeable character in One Hour With You, and McDonald gives perhaps her best performance among her four collaborations with Lubitsch. 

Lubitsch himself did not have a reputation as a groper, lech or adulterer; he was married twice but there is no existing evidence of the kind of sexual adventurism he celebrated in his films. There’s a great quote from critic Michael Wilmington: Lubitsch’s films “were directed by a man who was amused by sex rather than frightened of it – and who taught a whole culture to be amused by it as well.” And that is a huge part of what came to be known as ‘The Lubitsch Touch’. It was a light-hearted, joyful and hugely permissive approach to sex that allowed us to laugh along with things like adultery rather than be shocked or offended by it. In Lubitschland, sexual desire is omnipresent and unregulated: the Parisian cops encourage it, just not in the park. There are no priests tut-tutting, and certainly no children weeping as their parents engage in bitter custody disputes. Sex is free and easy and, most importantly, fun. It’s something to be looked forward to. 

In One Hour With You, the eager Mitzi, played very coquettishly by Genevieve Tobin, schemes to be visited by Chevalier’s Andre, and when her maid confirms he’s on his way over, she moans, falls back on her divan, kicks off her shoes and wiggles her feet in lustful anticipation. She can’t wait to knock Chevalier off this silly, sanctimonious ‘monogamy’ kick he’s on, and neither, quite frankly, can we. You can’t have a sex comedy without sex, and married sex, especially in Lubitschland, is just not very funny. Thrupples are funny. Adultery is funny. And if you can get on board with that, there’s nothing in One Hour With You to shock or offend or disgust or appall you. Lubitsch isn’t trying to provoke you. He just wants you to have a good time. 

Enjoy.

Saturday, 21 June 2025

AT IL CINEMA RITROVATO - Lowell Sherman's THE GREEKS HAD A WORD FOR THEM (USA, 1931) and more

Lowell Sherman & Ina Claire, The Greeks Had a Word for Them

Not having access at the moment to Andrew Sarris's book American Cinema I cant off the top of my head recall whether Lowell Sherman was grouped under Expressive Esoterica or Oddities and One Shots. Whatever, he was down among the also ran categories, a minor figure with some qualities that compared him to Lubitsch. His brief period of prominence coincided with pre-Code freedom and in The Greeks Had a Word for Them he used 79 rapid fire minutes to exploit it  to the hilt.  

The presenter, someone from the Library of Congress I think, didn't go very far into this specialist discussion but she did ask for a show of hands as to whom in the audience had not seen The Greeks Had a Word for Them.  A forest of hands, including mine, was raised.  According to Wikipedia Sarris, described Lowell Sherman's direction as having a "civilized sensibility" that was "ahead of its time." He also noted the "sophistication of his sexual humour" as being "notably free of malice"

Whatever, The Greeks Had a Word for Them  is a raucous comedy about three young women looking for men who will provide them with a lifestyle to which they would like to become accustomed. The women swap partners, bicker and compete but ultimately, sentimentally, go for gender solidarity over the attractions of catching rich husbands. Towards this end the farce gets ever more frenetic...The crowd loved it, especially I suspect those who had never seen not merely it, but quite likely the likes of it. It may be among the most vulgar pre-code manifestations of what Hollywood got away with before the wet blanket and blue stocking enforcers of the Hays Code got to have their way and stifled American film-making for a generation. Needless to say at least for me it's the hit of the season thus far...

I must confess that what the Greeks had a word for remains mysterious to viewers which may be why the title of the film was changed to Three Broadway Girls for subsequent bowdlerised releases. Sherman's sophisticated film-making did not get much more opportunity. He died of pneumonia in 1934.

My morning started with Dorothy Arzner's Christopher Strong, continued with Jocelyne Saab's 1985 Lebanese/French Ghazl El-Banat/ The Razor's Edge through to an unknown Spanish film from 1957 El inquilino/The Tenant (Jose Antonio Nieves Conde), a comedy about the housing shortage which in the light of recent events at the Sydney Film Festival had a ring of familiarity.

Fernando Fernan Gomez, Maria Rosa, Salgado
The Tenant

That film, while more than a bit of plod through its story, did have one notable feature, a concluding "Appendix" which detailed all of the censor cuts and edits made to the film after some thin-skinned bureaucrat at the Department of Housing saw it during its first run and went to war demanding changes that were designed to eliminate any criticism of the Fascist Franco Government of the day. The film was withdrawn, hacked to pieces and re-released to general indifference. Its new fantasy happy ending was of course totally unconvincing given the realist story line and setting of the original.


Tuesday, 9 November 2021

On Blu-ray - David Hare rhapsodises over Kay Francis in MARY STEVENS, M.D. (Lloyd Bacon, USA, 1933)


The sublime Kay Francis (above) wearing her early working class doctor's gown, designed of course by Warners' Orry-Kelly, who gives her another half dozen knockout gowns all accentuating her preternaturally small bosom and perfect neck and chest. She's even given a butch short haircut for her first internship scenes in this terrific Lloyd Bacon pre-code First National/Warner programmer from 1933, Mary Stevens, M.D.

One of seven highly desirable Blu-ray releases from the Archive line for this month of November.
The movie itself is a high paced action packed eye opener at 71 minutes and a surpassing turn of semi-stock characters include go-to Warner bad guy, here cum good guy, Lyle Talbot (who ended his career doing Ed Wood parts in Glen or Glenda and Bride of the Monster). DoP Sid Hickox (the GREAT Sid Hickox) lights him like Gable and almost makes him look sexy.
But nobody from any of the five (or is it now six?) sexes can match Kay Francis.
It's hard to believe she had just bounced from her previous Paramount glamour period, finishing with no less a masterpiece than Lubitsch’s 1932 Trouble in Paradise, only to land happily in the lap of Warner's Depression Era working class survive and beat-the-bastards cycle of crowd stirrers (Warner must have single-handedly won the election for FDR in 1933).
Kay is never less than compelling in the part, with best gal pal support from two terrific actors of the era, Glenda Farrell, and an all too rare part from the legendary Thelma Todd who shines in this picture, as though nothing had ever gone wrong with her terrible life.
And to wrap it all up, a totally breathtaking, mouth watering, eye-burning transfer from an original Nitrate neg, presumably deposited with the Library of Congress back when such a transfer as here looks like it was printed yesterday, still retaining every grain of silver gelatin and vibrating with that dusky pearlescent glow only 35mm Nitrate could deliver.
I would place this gem's transfer at the very top of the list of O-Neg nitrate titles delivered in either 1080p or 4K 2160p. It beggars me to even wonder how a 2160/4K UHD transfer could be any better than this.

Tuesday, 18 August 2020

Streaming - John Baxter examines "a tranquil tale of middle-class life" THREE ON A MATCH (Mervyn LeRoy, USA, 1932)


Bette Davis, Joan Blondell and Ann Dvorak light up.

SMOKE IN THEIR EYES 

       If Prohibition, PBS’s 2011 series by Ken Burns and Lynn Novick, seemed sluggish, I blamed Burns’s stately account of the American Civil WarAfter living through the slaughter of Gettysburg as evoked in Shelby Foote’s measured Mississippi growl, it was hard to get serious about bath-tub gin. However, it showed up better in a recent re-viewing, notably in its assertion that the Volstead Act vitally nourished popular culture, in particular jazz and the cinema. 

Mervyn LeRoy’s 1932 Three on a Match is a product of Darryl Zanuck’s tenure at Warner Brothers before left to form Twentieth Century pictures which later merged with William Fox’s moribund empire to create Twentieth Century-Fox.By the time of Zanuck’s frustrated departure, the USA had become `a nation of “scofflaws” - a term coined to describe someone indifferent to authority. 

Many movie stories came from such magazines as Collier’s, Red Book, Cosmopolitan, Scribner’s and the Saturday Evening Post. Reasoning that drinkers of illegal alcohol would no longer turn up their noses at thieves or adulterers, Zanuck injected into these tranquil tales of middle-class life the elements and characters of crime. Gangsters were suddenly articulate, even glamorous. The “forgotten men” on the breadlines became human, as did the show-business people who sang about them.

The working title of William Wellman’s landmark The Public Enemy, made during Zanuck’s time at Warnerswas Beer and Blood – fluids about which co-writer Kubec Glasmon, formerly a Chicago pharmacist, knew a great deal. Glasmon and partner John Bright also provided the story for Three on a Match, but co-writer Lucien Hubbard added an element of social history.


 0
Lyle Talbot, Humphrey Bogart and Ann Dvorak
  

There is a kidnap plot, and Humphrey Bogart (in what is said to be his first screen appearance as a gangster) sports his snap-brim Fedora and trade-mark snarl as an aide to Edward Arnold’s somewhat perfunctory Mr. Big.  However an elaborate montage occupies the first third of the film. In a manner reminiscent of such popular social histories of the time as Only Yesterday and Our Times, it races through a potted account of the previous few decades: prohibition and repeal, the stock market crash, the rise of radio and a national press; free education and its effects on racial distinctions, the influence on female independence of women’s suffrage, movies and the beauty business, all illustrated, significantly, by headlines and clippings from newspapers.  

It’s a good fifteen minutes before we meet Vivian, Mary and Ruth,  three women who graduate from high school together, but whose lives diverge as social and financial forces separate them. When the three share a reunion lunch, they light cigarettes from the same match, evoking the superstition that one will die. Even then, the film is eager to inform, explaining that match manufacturers invented this notion, hoping smokers would light up twice.  

The educational history of the three girls after graduation tells us all we need to know about them.  Conscientious Ruth (Bette Davis) goes to business school, wealthy Vivian (Ann Dvorak) to finishing school, and archetypal bad girl Mary (Joan Blondell) to reform school. Since the plot dictates that one should die, the self-indulgent Vivian duly exits through a fourth-floor hotel window, leaving Ruth and Mary to pick up the pieces of her life, notably her impossibly virtuous husband (Warren William) and their tiresome moppet (Buster Phelps), who muddles through Vivian’s decline on a diet of cocktail snacks.

"impossibly virtuous husband (Warren William) and their tiresome moppet (Buster Phelps)"

With alcohol out of fashion, Dvorak is shown succumbing to cocaine. It isn’t referred to by name, but Bogart’s sneer and a gesture towards his nose are obvious enough. Assigning to Vivian a drug associated with the sophisticated and creative elite supports the nature vs. nurture argument of the opening montage. Biology, not bad luck, controls these women’s lives. Vivian can no more escape addiction than school-fellow Willie Goldberg (Sidney Miller) can help being a parody Jew, making appreciative remarks about the tailoring of other boy’s suits, or Virginia Davis as the young Mary, ducking class to share a cigarette with the bad boys, can avoid growing up with round heels but a heart of gold. It’s a belief that would receive short shrift from the Production Code.

Editor's Note: A good copy of this film can be found if you click here

Virginia Davis shares a smoke with bad boys Frankie Darro and Junior Johnson