Wednesday, 26 December 2018

The Current Cinema - John Snadden finds a Christmas alternative MASTER Z: THE IP MAN LEGACY (Yuen Wo Ping, China) 'an above average martial arts feature'

In MASTER Z: THE IP MAN LEGACY, Michelle Yeoh shines and rising star Max Zhang shows he has the right stuff to take this franchise in a new direction.

The story takes place in 1960s Hong Kong (actually filmed in Mainland China on not very convincing sets), where Wing Chun exponent Cheung Tin Chi (Max Zhang Jin) tries to escape his violent past - with little success.

Michelle Yeoh, Master Z: The Ip Man Legacy
Director Yuen Wo Ping and action choreographer Donnie Yen are instrumental in making this pic into an above average martial arts feature. The generic story line does create three action set-pieces which are high points of the movie. Although, I did find the epic showdown between Cheung and gweilo heavy Davidson (Dave Bautista) to be a bit of a letdown. 

Max Zhang, Master Z: The Ip Man Legacy
There are some good supporting performances from Canto stars Ada Liu Yan as a nightclub hostess/singer and Phillip Keung in the role of a corrupt Hong Kong detective. Tony Jaa's prominent billing is completely unwarranted as his screen time is minimal…. and to little effect.

All considered, MASTER Z: THE IP MAN LEGACY is well worth a look. It's screening at multiplexes around Oz and at Melbourne's Chinatown cinema.

Monday, 24 December 2018

CINEMA REBORN - Happy Holidays

Get ready for some major announcements of our first titles for Cinema Reborn 2019. We'll be including our first silent film and some neglected classics of the Australian Cinema. It's all going to happen between 2-6 May 2019 in the superb theatre at the Australian Film Television and Radio School in Moore Park Sydney

In the meantime don't forget that any donation to Cinema Reborn is now tax deductible if you donate through this site via the Australian Cultural Fund.

Checkout the site for a clue about one of our 2019 titles. Just click here




Saturday, 22 December 2018

Defending Cinephilia (8) - Adrian Danks finds much pleasure in getting out and about

Unlike last year, I did get out a lot more but not so often to new movies. 2018 was marked by my first visit to Il Cinema Ritrovato in Bologna, the first edition of Cinema Reborn in Sydney, and what proved to be a fairly bumper year for the Melbourne Cinematheque (which I co-curate with my comrades Michael Koller, Eloise Ross, Cerise Howard and Michelle Carey). 2018 also marked Michelle’s final year as the Artistic Director of the Melbourne International Film Festival, leaving behind an extraordinary legacy that will be impossible to match. 

'closest to his best', Phantom Thread, (Paul Thomas Anderson)
It was also defined by a number of very good films – though certainly not their best by any means – by an array of the greatest directors currently working: Nuri Bilge Ceylan, Lucrecia Martel, Lee Chang-Dong, Jean-Luc Godard and Paul Thomas Anderson (though he was certainly the closest to his best here). My 2018 was also marked by finally subscribing to Netflix, a service that delivered three of the richest and most enjoyable – if in some cases a little overrated – films of the year: Cuarón’s Roma, the Coens’ The Ballad of Buster Scruggs and Welles’ The Other Side of the Wind. It was remarkable to finally see a version of Welles’ film, but I must admit to being a little bit disappointed that the most startling and innovative parts of the film – the “art movie” being made by Jack Hannaford – is somewhat tossed away as a self-conscious, film-within-a-film joke (the kind of movie Welles wouldn’t make, though he sort of just did). A fair bit of the rest is either fascinating or fairly tedious. Like Adrian Martin, I certainly prefer Welles’ other essayistic explorations of the time – such as F for Fake(1973) and Filming “Othello” (1978) – but am very glad to have another Welles film to delve back into.

Another highlight of the year was the Edith Head show – The Costume Designer: Edith Head and Hollywood – at the Bendigo Art Gallery. This provided a very substantial survey of Head’s costumes and a clear illustration of why her work has stood the test of time – with the exception of lavish costumes for films such as The Greatest Show on Earth (Cecil B. DeMille, 1952) that were well outside her comfort zone, Head’s costumes are notable for their wearability, even ordinariness. This was a terrifically mounted show that gave you a real sense of both her actual achievement and the transformative qualities of the cinema itself (at some level what you see are just clothes and not what you experience on the screen). It was an exhibition that wasn’t frightened to suggest that conclusion and was all the more valuable for it.

Sergei Eisenstein
I also travelled to Italy for two stellar events: the Eisenstein for the 21st Century symposium convened by Julia Vassilieva in Prato, which revealed many fascinating insights into Eisenstein’s life and work including the extraordinary archives held in Moscow; and Il Cinema Ritrovato. There is so much that could be said about the latter, but I’ll restrict myself to a few highlights: the John M. Stahl retrospective, the Piazza Maggiore screening of Emilio Fernández’s Enamorada (1946) with Scorsese in attendance, the opera house presentation of Borzage’s 7th Heaven (1927) and the truly astounding restoration of Ulmer’s Detour (1945).
Publicity shot, Detour (Edgar G Ulmer)
After so many years of watching this in poor quality, severely damaged and dupey prints, the clarity of the painstaking restoration almost felt wrong (but isn’t), denying the legend of the film’s precarious C-grade reputation and the director’s poverty row credentials. Don’t get me wrong, the film still betrays its short production schedule, minimal sets and depopulated frame, but it is now possible to better assess the true visual and aural qualities of Ulmer’s achievement.

This brings me to my two absolute highlights or (re)discoveries of the year, both involving, as with Ulmer, Jewish directors born in Germany or Austria who were exiled in Hollywood and elsewhere in Europe for large parts of their careers. My favourite event of the year was the fledgling Cinema Reborn festival in Sydney in early May helmed by the estimable Geoff Gardner. This was a highly collegial, warm and intimate celebration of film history and the art of restoration that found a canny sweet spot between Australian cinema, important international revivals and some true curios. May it keep running for many years.
Edwige Feuillere, Sans Lendemain (Max Ophuls)
There were many highlights including Chadi Abdel Salam’s two films – a synecdoche for the event itself, as Phillip Adams sagely suggested in his terrific introduction – but it was truly wonderful to finally see Max Ophuls’ Sans lendemain (1939) – as the opening night film – in a luminous looking digital “print”. This is really the lynchpin between Ophuls’ work in Europe in the 1930s and the magnificent run of films that define his reputation and mark the end of his career, and, I think, one of his true masterpieces. 

Emil Jannings, Variety, (E A Dupont)
As is also true of the much more familiar Madame de…, the first film I saw at Il Cinema Ritrovato in the extraordinary surrounds of the Piazza Maggiore. The other great rediscovery were two films by E. A. Dupont, both wonderfully detailed and extraordinarily staged sagas of “theatrical” life, and both in beautiful restorations. Variety (1925) screened at the Melbourne Cinematheque and managed to survive one of the worst contemporary scores I’ve ever heard, by British “cabaret” band The Tiger Lillies (avoid that soundtrack option at all costs).
Das Alte Gesetz  (E A Dupont)
The other was a less well-known work, 
Das Alte Gesetz (This Ancient Law, 1923), which screened at the Jewish International Film Festival in Melbourne. It’s a film that has often been compared to The Jazz Singer (Alan Crosland, 1927) but is in fact a much greater cinematic achievement providing a fascinating, fine-grained portrait of Jewish and theatrical life in mid-19th-century Europe. Although his career lost its way – absolutely – in the early 1930s, he is certainly a “subject for further research”.

A final note. The screening of several Chris Marker films at Il Cinema Ritrovato, including another terrific restoration of La Jetée(1962), reminded me of the tragic death of my close friend, one-time cinephile and creator of the Chris Marker Database, Adrian Miles. I raise my glass to him and 2018, a wake lit by fireworks.
Adrian Miles







Thursday, 20 December 2018

Australian Experimental Film - A Season at the Austrian Film Museum

Albie Thoms (see Program 2)
Editor’s Note: Thanks to Adrian Martin for noticing the following programs screening at the Austrian Film Museum in Vienna on February 6 and 7. Here’s the info from the Museum's website You have to go a long way to see this stuff, notwithstanding the sterling efforts of Bill Mousoulis and others to get similar things done. Here’s the info and the programme

Australian experimental cinema contains many histories. One persistent storyline involves the use of the film medium as a tool to enlarge and enhance the viewer's perception. Another considers the recurrence of co-operative forms in an art practice marked by collectivism and collaboration. Yet another story relays artists' responses to the environment as a subject, protagonist and idea. These threads combine in the three programs of "A Collected Gaze".

A Collected Gaze 1: Play of Light
Bouddi (1970) Arthur und Corinne Cantrill. 16mm, Farbe, 8 min
Bondi (1979) Paul Winkler. 16mm, Farbe, 14 min
Waterfall (1984) Arthur und Corinne Cantrill. 16mm, Farbe, 18 min
One View (1985) Maggie Fooke und Chris Knowles. 16mm, Farbe, 13 min
Light Play (1986) Dirk de Bruyn. 16mm, Farbe, 7 min
Mind's Eye (1998) Gregory Godhard. 16mm, Farbe, 5 min
Last Train (2016) Dianna Barrie. 16mm, Farbe, 12 min
A Collected Gaze 2: Painting with Motion
Approximately Water (1972) Lynsey Martin. 16mm, Farbe, 3 min
223 = Two Two Three (1985) Dirk de Bruyn. 16mm, Farbe, 6 min
Tales from Vienna Hoods (1998) Marcus Bergner. 16mm, Farbe, 14 min
Rainbow Way (1977) George Gittoes. 16mm Farbe, 11 min
Fe (1973) Andrew Pike. 16mm, sw, 4 min
Bluto (1967) Albie Thoms. 16mm, Farbe, 6 min
Wax Into Gold (2001) Lee Smith. 16mm, Farbe, 7 min
Jdeb (2001) Lee Smith. 16mm, Farbe, 8 min
Flyscreen (2009) Richard Tuohy. 16mm, sw, 9 min
Soda (2017) Hanna Chetwin. 16mm, sw, 7 min

A Collected Gaze 3: Artist Film Workshop, Melbourne
Southern Climes (2018) Hanna Chetwin. 16mm, Farbe, 12 min
Tiangong-1 (2018) Paddy Hay und Louis Marlo. 16mm, Farbe, 8 min
Vyv and Beat (2018) Audrey Lam. 16mm, Farbe, 13 min
Family Photo (2018) James Waters. 16mm, Farbe, 4 min
Shoplifting (2018) Lucas Haynes. 16mm, Farbe, 7 min
Etienne's Hand (2003) Richard Tuohy. 16mm, sw, 13 min
Satellite Single (2018) Sabine Maselli. 16mm, sw, 9 min
Internal and External Objects (2018) Giles Fielke. 16mm, sw, 7 min
Pharmacy (2018) Giles Fielke. 16mm, Farbe, 10 min

Wednesday, 19 December 2018

The Current Cinema - David Hare salutes the achievements of Alfonso Cuaron's ROMA

We finally watched Roma last night and I was surprised and relieved to find I didn't hate it. 
I don't think it's the greatest film released in 2018 by a long shot. At least three other films take that prize for me, notably Paul Schrader's First Reformed, (click on the link for David's review) Zvyagintsev's Loveless,  which can bear some comparison with Cuaron's film for dialectically opposite strategies and subject matter, and - of all people - the Coens’ superb six part homage to How the West was WonThe Ballad of Buster Scruggs. There are more in my top ten list including Cuaron's, but I have missed too much else to make any more of that. 
The Cuaron has been most notably dissected and done over for frying in Richard Brody's New Yorker piece from this week's edition. As Brody's writing goes I'm rarely in tune, except in some cases with him on Godard. In this case he seems to be attacking Cuaron for not making the film he wanted to see, presumably a personal memoir constructed within a political discourse and a full scale character and contextual development of Yaritza Alparicio's bougeois family maid, Cleo (below). 
I find these vanity exercises in criticism (and I have done a few of my own) pointless and unfair in the failure of duty they owe to what the movie does in fact achieve. 
Where Brody laments the highly rehearsed, staged and directed long travelling shots, and the sheer pictorialism of the sequences, I celebrate them for their formal consistency. What Cuaron adds to this formal approach is, whether you like it or even think it's successful, the brightly lit and exposed high end, high rez (6.5K) digital photography which doesn’t lend the image much latitude for close ups. Indeed, there are very few of these, the principle one on Cleo's face in the hospital ward for the duration of her ordeal there. 
The photography in fact encourages a defocusing from the personal to the 'Scope group spectacle which the Arri Alexa cameras capture with startling, even forensic, and grain free resonance. The only sequence in which he plays meaningfully with darkness alternating with light is in a single frontal group wide shot of the family, with Cleo watching a TV comedy, in which Plato's' philosophers' cave is referenced with the reflected binary of light and shade from the television screen. Tellingly the predominant sound on the track is the family's laughter. The moment is pure and distilled. 
In fact, the digital photography is probably to me the single issue that sometimes detracts from a complete and more or less unreserved response. I understand his tactic, and I think it relates to what he is actually giving us, an entirely Proustian reverie in which the sheer persistence of highlighted memory itself, ever so jointly unreliable, but also prescient is formally underlined by the almost hyperreal quality of the photography. Sometimes this works superbly, sometimes less so. 
It probably says as much as I otherwise need to say to simply recount that the second half of the picture intensifies the narrative pulse and strategy by setting up three gut wrenching sequences in a row before the coda. Here Cuaron's formal tactics pay off in spades and he achieves, with magnificent simplicity exactly what he had wanted to do, which is to move us, deeply and profoundly, with the heart of these three sequences. Politics, society, even characterization and class are totally outside consideration here, for all the resonances that inevitably bounce off the centrality of the maid, Cleo to the material. But the sequences all achieve in their own right reality, and absolute value in the cumulative impact. And the film ends. Forcefully and totally rooted in the remembered past. As present. 
Cuaron has not needed or wanted to make a grand metaphysical statement, or some quasi-60s Left revival commentary on corrupt 70s Mexican politics and the immersion of the CIA in the whole dirty regime. He is starting with the Proustian madeleine, in this piece the boiled eggs, which Cleo sublimely and effortlessly taps and spreads into the children's plates. Everything else is subordinate to the sheer overwhelming power of memory, and pleasure. 
Roma is not necessarily the greatest work of this year or any other year but it doesn't need to be. It attempts to express a formal presentation of an artist’s memory of a year in his childhood, a time when everything changed. This is something much more modest and in the end far more satisfying than the big gestural pictures. And he moves us, very deeply. 
I cannot ask any more from the movies than that. In a year of heartlessly if expertly made, hollow dreck this film towers above most of it.

Tuesday, 18 December 2018

Bill Gosden retires from directing the New Zealand International Film Festival

Editor's Note: This message about my friend Bill Gosden has gone round the world. Bill transformed the festival into an international powerhouse and devoted thirty years of his life to promoting the best in New Zealand and international cinema. His shoes will be hard to fill. More anon but here is Bill's official announcement.


I'm chiming into the December frenzy to announce my retirement as director of the New Zealand International Film Festival effective from the end of March 2019. After 18 months of sticking with my work through surgeries and treatment, I’ve been brought to this reluctant decision by continuing illness and the need for continuing treatment. 
The patient support and understanding of NZIFF Trustees and staff have sustained me through the last year, while celebrating NZIFF’s 50th year in Auckland provided me with a welcome focus. Best-ever attendances for our programme there (and across the country) see me leaving on a high note. Such a success reflects the cohesive strength of key staff whose service to NZIFF is measured not in years but decades: Communications Manager Rebecca McMillan (one decade), Accounts Manager Alan Collins (one +), Programme Manager Michael McDonnell (almost two), Programmer Sandra Reid and General Manager Sharon Byrne (both two +). Whoever steps up to lead the programme can look forward to working with five sterling individuals who love their work and know NZIFF backwards. The Board too is anchored in long service, not least in trustee Andrew Langridge and chair Catherine Fitzgerald whose presence stretches back to the 1980s.
As for me, March 2019 will make the 40th anniversary of my beginning my original role with the New Zealand Federation of Film Societies – whence I was loaned out for three months every year to administer the Wellington Film Festival. In a constantly shifting mediascape there have been few dull stretches since. Regular iterations of the impending demise of cinema always denied us the luxury of reclining into ‘business as usual’.
Though a few hardy individualists tough it out alone, filmmaking itself is generally a collaborative project. So, for sure, is making a film festival. Marshalling the myriad interests at play may require concentration, discernment and even a little imagination, but the will to keep NZIFF thriving is widely shared. I am reminded again and again of the diversity of supporters who have seen us through the red and the black, the thick and thin.
I had the good luck to arrive where I did when I did. In 1979 the battle was well underway to rescue our screens from total colonisation. (Read John Reid’s superb book about Pacific Films for a daunting account of the previous 30 years.) The opportunities were too good not to seize, the old guard so complacent and condescending that disruption was both prerogative and pleasure. Countless ventures later, I am myself faced by the ultimate disrupter in the dreaded, if all too familiar shape of cancer. Though I shan’t be short of ways to fill my days, I am going to miss so richly populated a working life. I leave with few regrets, proud of what NZIFF has been able to pull off.
If I ever felt supervised in my work, it was by NZIFF audiences. There are certain aspects of working in public few would miss, but alarming interactions with the displeased have sometimes proven as energising as the triumphs. I recall being pursed into the Civic office to be cornered by a patron so incredulous that I claimed greatness for film as patently awful as Pialat’s Van Gogh that she needed a closer look at me. On the other hand, one scarcely more reasonable respondent to this year’s audience questionnaire demanded that I live forever. I have been booed on opening night at the Embassy because I bemoaned the banning of Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer. I felt myself the happiest, funniest, sleep-deprived man alive on another opening night, when I introduced Y tu mamá también, two hours after the Censorship Board of Review denied the injunction against its screening sought by self-appointed (and state sanctioned) upholders of ‘community standards.’
I’ve kicked the furniture when audiences jeered at the little critters in The Night of the Hunter. I’ve basked in reflected glory when premiere audiences, as I felt sure they would, embraced Mr Wrong, Topless Women Talk About Their Lives, Ngati, Kaikohe Demolition, Poi E, The Dark Horse, Scarfies, An Angel at My Table, Waves, Banana in a Nutshell, Yellow is Forbidden, The Ground We Won, Heavenly Creatures, In My Father’s Den and many, many more.
As I introduced Buster Keaton’s The General to a packed Civic on the final night in Auckland this year, I knew this might be my parting appearance in the role. I had been at the APO’s tech rehearsal in the morning, so my final-night exhaustion was buoyed by absolute confidence that we were in for a near-perfect rendition of one of the most breath-taking and funny movies ever made. I left the stage aloft on the good will and excitement of the crowd. The denizens of I Row stood to let me through to the seat I allocated myself dead centre. Job done. What satisfaction. And how brilliantly the film and the orchestra, under the baton of Peter Scholes, surpassed my promises.
In our survey six weeks later, several respondents told us how much they had loved that wonderful night at the Civic. My introduction had been good, the most detailed comment concluded, because it enabled late-comers to be seated before the movie began.
To whoever steps up next, I wish you the best of luck in curbing those damned late-comers. They are not my responsibility any more. Information about applying for the job can be found if you click here .
Happy Holidays – and Long Live NZIFF!
Bill Gosden

Monday, 17 December 2018

Digitisation and Preservation - Prime Ministers digitised - Australia's Film Heritage Stands Waiting

National Archives of Australia
In the Mid-Year Economic Forecasts issued by the Treasurer and Prime Minister, on the same day as an Assistant Minister was outed by New Idea for some online indiscretions, some information was supplied about  new money for digitisation of records.

Digitisation of Prime Ministers' Records
Expense ($m) 2017-18 
2018-19 
2019-20 
2020-21 
2021-22 
National Archives of Australia 
1.0 
2.0 


.





“The Government will provide $3.0 million over two years from 2018-19 to support the digitisation of the records of former Prime Ministers. Digitising these records will improve access to these historical records from the time they are released to the public under the Archives Act 1983”

All the other  demands for money for digitisation of the nation's film and audio-visual heritage and all other national collections remain on hold. Maybe Scott Morrison will make it the centrepiece of his re-election strategy. 

The National Gallery has been allocated $14m too new money to maintain the building and for art preservation.