Following
on from Acting CEO Meg Labrum’s recent evidence to the Senate Estimates
Committee on Environment and Communications, an extract of which you can find here, some more information about the precarious
NFSA budget and the future demands for funds to support the digitization of the
collection quickly came to hand.
First
however, a post on Facebook by Dominic Case draws attention to the institution’s
allocation for the coming year: “If I've read
David Tiley’s budget summary right, NFSA will actually get a marginal increase
in funding of $880,000. That's about 3%, after several years of
"efficiency dividend" cuts, and with dwindling "own source"
revenue. Probably won't go very far towards the $30m digitisation bill.”
A reader
has also drawn attention to an
Aust Library & Information Association web page - web page - which includes the following statement re the
Federal budget 2017-18:
'There was mention of other cultural
institutions in relation to the Public Service Modernisation Fund — agency
sustainability measures. “The Government will invest $129.6 million over three
years from 2017-18 in a number of agencies to support their transition to more
modern and sustainable operating models. This measure enables agencies to
upgrade outdated ICT systems and other assets. The measure will support
improvements in maintaining the integrity of heritage assets such as the
National Maritime Museum, National Film and Sound Archive and Old Parliament
House.”'
Another reader
offers some further commentary following on from Meg Labrum’s evidence where,
in response to a question about the cost of digitizing the NFSA collection she
advised: We have
costed it and we are looking at a proposal that is almost $30 million to deal
with the priority materials relating to six national collections, including
ourselves.
This of course is
not quite what the question asked but… oh well.
A correspondent
advises that in fact the figure of $30 million mentioned probably goes all the way
back to estimates assembled when the last Labor Government was in office and
the various collecting institutions put together a strategy called the Digital
Deluge. This was the figure nominated at the time and, in the light of any
later estimates, is what is apparently still being offered. Some believe it to be a major understatement
of the likely cost of doing a thorough job on the NFSA collection alone. A
figure of between $50m and $100m is alternately proposed across the collecting
institutions.
My correspondent
also notes that the $16m for the National Library of Australia to digitize its
PAPER collection is an indicator of how much might be needed to get the
necessary coverage of the FILM and TAPE held by the NFSA. Comparison is also suggested with an
allocation made to the Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Studies which got $20m to digitize its media collection, a much smaller body of
work than is held by the NFSA.
And just to
give you some idea about the demands that film makes, here’s a paragraph from a
piece about the work of scholar and archivist Nicola Mazzanti gleaned from an online source
Proper protocol, unfortunately, is
costly. In an article published last year in ARTFORUM, Mazzanti cites a 2007 study that estimates the yearly
cost of preserving the 4K digital master of an average-length feature to be
over 12 times as expensive as preserving an archival film master. As for saving
all of the film’s source material (including camera originals, outtakes, etc.),
the figure goes up to an incredible $200,000. “Needless to say, the danger of
loss is far from being equally distributed,” writes Mazzanti, projecting that
an alarming 80% of the yearly cinematic output from Africa, Asia, and South America
will vanish, versus 10% for the US and Europe. Moreover, one can expect large
discrepancies in the types of films that survive, even in wealthy nations.
Artists’ works, independent productions, and experimental films are far more
endangered than, say, The Hunger Games.
Possibly
more to come….
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.