A DARK TWO HOURS
Max Berghouse added some complimentary comments to the generally ecstatic
lauds that seem to be greeting Joe Wright’s Darkest
Hour. He did have some
qualifications, though, and that’s where I’d like to pick up. I can’t say I had a very satisfactory time
with the film. (Click on the images to enlarge them.)
Joe Wright (r) |
Wright has certainly made a number of films
that have been very favourably received ‘in the right circles, the respectable
circles.’ Perhaps the rot, however, set
in with the reception of Atonement (2007). Here, he had a wonderful novel as source
material. And with Ian McEwan (the novel’s original author) and Christopher
Hampton as screenwriters, he was pretty much safe.
James McAvoy, Atonement |
But Wright had to prove he was a film director. So he came up with a
virtuoso ten-minute long tracking shot along the stranded troops at
Dunkirk. In the middle of the film, the
sequence screamed out, “Look at me. Aren’t I fucking brilliant!” And because the shot was so obviously
virtuosic most of the critics said, “Yes, you’re fucking brilliant.” Despite
the fact that this completely disrupted the film’s rhythm and didn’t serve any
other dramatic purpose in the film.
Anna Karenina |
Of course, these kinds of shots and devices
can work – and I think they do, brilliantly, in his 2012 film of Anna Karenina. Here, he had the controlling concept of his
screenwriter, Tom Stoppard, another formidable English writer, who came up with
a wonderfully theatrical framework for adapting such a complex piece of
literature. Wright had lots of reasons
to be ‘show-off’ in coming up with theatrical devices, and they’re consistent
throughout the film. I think it’s one of the most creative examples of how a
difficult literary work can be adapted to cinema. Thanks, I’m sure to Stoppard.
Anthony McCarten |
Then up comes Darkest Hour. Script –
Anthony McCarten. Main claim to fame so
far, the bio-pic of Stephen Hawking.
Perfectly acceptable, but no great insights or depths to the story. You don’t have to when you have a life like
that.
And McCarten doesn’t really do much with
Churchill either. But you don’t need to
when you can get an actor to go for an easy impersonation rather than a
performance. And Oldman gives a very effective impersonation, within the bounds
of the script.
Darkest Hour |
Meanwhile, Wright continues looking for
moments to show he is directing. And it was these moments that kept
popping up and distracting me throughout the film. Westminster is busy, even in
the lobby – how do we show this? Choreograph two extras (MPs or similar) to
walk as a pair across the back of the set, left to right. When they reach the
end of the screen, start off the next pair of extras to walk from the top of
the frame to the bottom, where another two are waiting to now cross from right
to left. Where (surprise!) another two are waiting for their cue to complete
the square by moving from the bottom of the screen to the top.
Or Churchill in a dark moment, retreats to
a small room (can’t remember now if it’s a pantry, or what) that has a door
with a small glass window on it. So when Oldman is on his mark inside the room,
the door can shut. The lighting outside the room is pitch dark, so when the
door shuts, there’s only this small rectangle in the middle of the otherwise
black frame, and in it is Oldman’s head, despondent. Get the symbolism?
Kristin Scott Thomas, Clementine Churchill |
I’m really not someone who notices women’s
hairstyles in a film. But I couldn’t
avoid Kristen Scott Thomas’s monster as Clementine Churchill. Now, look at any
images of Clementine and she did wear a somewhat extravagant hairstyle. But it
also looked liveable. Not here. Or
perhaps by this stage, I was so either so aware that dramatically the film was
rather thin, or I’d become so distracted by all of Joe Wright’s ‘touches of
directorial flair’ that I was missing the drama.
Sorry, everyone. I think this will clean up
at the Oscars – and they deserve it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.