As I mentioned last week, I’d already seen
the vast majority of this week’s Criterion selections from Fandor, which this
week showed classics of silent cinema. The selection included films from
Charlie Chaplin, Victor Sjöström and G.W. Pabst, as well as Benjamin
Christensen’s quasi-documentary Haxan
(1922), which I wrote about here recently. This week I watched the two films on
that list I hadn’t seen: one Danish and austere (though described by Criterion
as a ‘gentle comedy’), the other Japanese and playful (though heartfelt and
soul-searching).
Master of the House (Carl
Theodor Dreyer, Denmark, 1925) impressed me with the sophistication and
intricacy of its storytelling. Dreyer’s film examines the life of a
hard-working woman whose overbearing and cruel husband is making her life a
misery. She puts him first in everything, even scraping the butter from her own
bread to offer him a better meal, but nothing she does is ever enough to please
him. He lashes out at her constantly, and is equally harsh with his children.
The wife’s mother and an old friend who helps look after the children see this
situation, and try to convince our heroine to leave.
Dreyer spends a lot of time examining the
specifics of housework. We watch as chores are carried out, and the time we
spend with them helps to make it more heartbreaking when they are ignored or
criticised. The plot is more complicated than that of many silent films I have
seen, but the precision and clarity of Dreyer make it easier to follow than
most. While Dreyer was good at conveying human suffering, he doesn’t wallow in
it. Indeed, he swings too hard in the other direction as the film closes,
giving us a happy ending which seems curiously naïve. There’s also a truly
bizarre statement in the opening title card, which implies that cruel men like
this are a thing of the past in Denmark, but they still exist elsewhere in the
world. What an optimist.
I was Born, But…
(Yasujiro Ozu, Japan, 1932) is a similarly complex silent work, though it
offers a good dose of fun before delving into the depths of human insecurity. The
film follows a pair of young boys who have moved to a new town, and who get
into a great deal of innocent mischief. I was surprised to be reminded of the
Beano comics I read as a child, but that’s the tone Ozu used for the first half
of his film. The brothers clash with a group of bullies at their new school, but
they’re treated as more of a puzzle to be solved than a threat.
The comic tone of the film seemed out of
character to me at first, since I am familiar with Ozu from his work in slow
and subtle familial dramas like Late
Spring (1949), Tokyo Story (1953)
and Floating Weeds (1959). This side of
Ozu appears in sudden and dramatic fashion in the second half of the silent
film, as the boys realise their father works for one of their classmates. They
confront their father, accusing him of being an unimportant person, and Ozu
spends a long time watching the father as his sons’ words strike a nerve,
throwing him into a deep and dark existential crisis. It takes a deft hand to weave
such glee and such anguish into a cohesive whole, and Ozu was up to the task
even in the early stages of his career.
We’ll stay in Japan for next week’s piece, as Fandor’s new selections are a series of films from Akira Kurosawa,
focusing on his work set in the 20th century. I’ve seen a number of his films,
but almost all of those have been samurai epics. I’m looking forward to
exploring another side of his work.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.