There may never have been a Prime Minister before who
blithely allowed his Treasurer to cut into money flowing into the PM’s own,
very specific, constituency in the way that Malcolm Turnbull has done in recent
days. Treasurer Scott (‘work, save,invest’) Morrison announced the latest cuts
in the Federal Government’s Mid-Year Economic Forecasts. The PM was nowhere to
be seen and in fact took off for a one dayer with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe,
one of the current crop of far right Japanese politicians busily attempting to
rewrite history and thus a man not to be trusted on anything from building
submarines to resuming the slaughter of whales in the Southern Ocean.
Which left the film industry to howl at the moon as ever
more money was siphoned out of its government provided reserves. This is the third such
extraction since Abbott and now Turnbull took up Canberra residence in
somewhere else other than The Lodge. What the film industry has done to the
Liberal Party, apart from presenting itself as a soft target, is hard to guess.
Whatever, Prime Minister Turnbull, in whose electorate of Wentworth lies much of the industry's network
of studios, production houses, supporting businesses and key personnel, has
been conspicuously silent on this, as on many of the other matters for which
there was hope that he might draw some decisive ends to the abominations of the
Abbott Credlin era.
Not to be
apparently. Needless to say the affected institution, Screen Australia, far
from exercising its statutory independence in the manner of Gillian Triggs, has
meekly accepted its fate. Inside Film reported that ‘a spokeswoman for Screen Australia said while
any cut was difficult, Screen Australia understood the fiscal position of the
government.’ By which we take it to mean that Screen Australia, like the rest
of the apparatus of the Federal Government probably also accepts that its fate
is what it is in some very large part because News Corp, Google, Amazon and more than five hundred
others of the biggest listed companies in Australia pay no tax and thus Federal
Government spending has to be squeezed to accommodate the situation wherein the
iron ore, oil and gas companies have stopped being tax milch cows and the
Commonwealth budget has opened up some possibly catastrophic black holes. Pity the film industry, always seen as a
vanity come cottage affair needing perpetual subsidy to survive.
The only
peeps I’ve been able to discern came from the SMH which published an editorial
about the film industry and how Malcolm and his mostly boys were getting it
wrong. This was followed by a stern letter to the editor from industry veteran Anthony Buckley but nothing else.
Then there was a press statement from the Screen Producers Association which said “the fresh funding cuts to Screen Australia would affect innovation and the global competitiveness of the Australian screen production industry. For the third time in 18 months there has been a funding cut to Screen Australia. This efficiency dividend comes after almost $4 million was cut over the forward estimates earlier this year, on top of $38 million the year before. In the five years to 2018-19 this will total more than $50 million in combined cuts across budgets.
Then there was a press statement from the Screen Producers Association which said “the fresh funding cuts to Screen Australia would affect innovation and the global competitiveness of the Australian screen production industry. For the third time in 18 months there has been a funding cut to Screen Australia. This efficiency dividend comes after almost $4 million was cut over the forward estimates earlier this year, on top of $38 million the year before. In the five years to 2018-19 this will total more than $50 million in combined cuts across budgets.
Far from
recognising the personal hurt inflicted on his very own constituents, the PM, in a
manner to which we are becoming increasingly accustomed when he has to deal
with bad news, has said nothing indeed disappeared from the front and centre position leaving it to the already increasingly hapless Sco Mo to bluster about it all. That’s interesting and it’s not a tactic
normally followed by any politician who smells that those closest to him, who
might indeed affect his future quite materially, are not happy. I know of at least one major industry figure,
one of the PM’s constituents, who has written to him in outraged terms. I’m
waiting to hear whether a reply will be forthcoming especially in these times
when the art of letter writing to one's constituents has just about disappeared.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.