Listen
To Me Marlon, (Stevan Rilay, UK, 2015, Masters & Restorations Section)
Seymour
: An Introduction (Ethan Hawke,
USA 2014, Backbeat Section)
During a Film Festival, several
films can rub up against each other in mutually illuminating ways. This was the case
for me with these two films which I saw back-to-back.
(Only needed a change of cinemas).
I’ll start with Seymour: An
Introduction, directed by Ethan Hawke.
Its subject is Seymour Bernstein, a classical pianist now in his late
80s who retired from a highly successful
performing career at 50.
Hawke appears several times, when
he introduces Bernstein to a small musical soiree, and explains how he came to
be making the film. He had met Bernstein
at a dinner party, felt so comfortable talking with the elderly musician about
his own sense of incompleteness with his career, and felt impelled to discover
why Seymour felt so comfortable with his own artistic life.
So, a major theme emerges
clearly – what impels a career in the arts, and why artists frequently are so
dissatisfied with their successes. Now,
in a teaching career Bernstein comes across as a wonderfully contented person,
still giving wonderful lessons, and enjoying the warmth and enduring affection
of past pupils, and the full respect of many including the manager of the
rental section of Steinway pianos.
From one of Steinway’s past
pupils, an idea emerged that kept playing in my head. This past pupil, now a concert performer
himself, said how it was important for him to keep composing music, and always included one of his own pieces in his
concerts. Which made me think of
interesting differences between the creative artist and the re-creative
artist. A concert pianist, after all,
spends hours and hours and hours practicing to come closer to expressing the
ideas of another person. A performance is, in a way, an interpretation not a
full individual creative act.
And perhaps for many actors this
some disconnect exists with their impulsion to be creative and the fact that
their career involves being a pawn to realise other people’s creative
ideas. Hawke would appear to have found
his own ways to handle this, having now written
novels, been involved in the scripts of films he’s appeared in
(especially with Richard Linklater) and also directing several films. But it’s interesting that in Seymour he states his sense of something
empty in the career. Perhaps it this
feeling that is the important driving force – the urge to be more and more
creative rather than always just re-creative.
We’re certainly aware of the bad
reputation that Brando earned over the course of his career, rewriting scripts,
leaving projects,”phoning in performances”, sending an American-Indian proxy to
accept an Oscar. And of desperately sad
events in his private life, perhaps culminating with his son’s murder of his
half-sister’s boyfriend.
Listen to Me Marlon does not of course come up with a definitive
analysis of Brando, as an artist or as a person. But it does represent his
complexity and his lifelong quest for “something”. Perhaps if that “something”
could be defined more completely, if it wasn’t so abstract we’d have more
contented actors, and actresses (and concert pianists) but then we’d miss the
fire that comes from their search.
These two films both
communicated aspects of this creative urge in their own way. The Brando film
will probably be more widely seen, if simply because its subject is already so
well known. But Hawke's film about Seymour Bernstein deserves to be seen just
as widely. Even if just for the sheer pleasure of spending time in the company
of such a wonderful old man.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.