In the ten years between 1993 and 2002, the
Australian Film, Television & Radio School produced 29 graduates who have
directed 55 feature films.
In the ten years between 2003 and 2012, the
School produced 3 graduates who have directed 5 feature films.
So what’s gone wrong? My current interest in AFTRS started some little time ago when
there were mutterings that there was some sort of skulduggery going on in
relation to the appointment of the next CEO. Such things always pique the
curiosity, especially when it comes to institutions that are spending your
hard-earned taxes. This was taking place against a background of the
re-introduction of a three year degree course at the institution and the hiring
of Ben Gibson the former head of the
London Film School, to come out here and run the Degree Program. The proof that
it was happening is here. My goodness, a job for a
wrangler there. But I digress.
Some six months earlier an announcement about the Degree Program was posted.
It noted: “The new BA
will be the most in-depth and creatively comprehensive screen degree in the
world. Designed to prepare Australia’s next generation of creative
practitioners to be the leaders in their respective fields, the degree will
provide a deeply engaging learning experience that will develop critical
thinking and creative engagement.
“It will prepare graduates to be nimble operators in a platform agnostic world. It fuses deep scholarly engagement with the art of storytelling. Two core subjects, ‘Story & Writing’ and ‘The History of Film’ run for three years as well as elective specialist subjects. Throughout the three-year program exciting opportunities for collaboration with other students are fundamental to the course. OK, some licence and hyperbole can always be tolerated and whomever came up with the phrase "nimble operators in a platform agnostic world" earned their pay that day.
“It will prepare graduates to be nimble operators in a platform agnostic world. It fuses deep scholarly engagement with the art of storytelling. Two core subjects, ‘Story & Writing’ and ‘The History of Film’ run for three years as well as elective specialist subjects. Throughout the three-year program exciting opportunities for collaboration with other students are fundamental to the course. OK, some licence and hyperbole can always be tolerated and whomever came up with the phrase "nimble operators in a platform agnostic world" earned their pay that day.
The announcement naturally made no mention of
the abandonment of the Bachelor and Masters Degree Programs which had existed
at AFTRS from 1984 to 2009 and that this was in fact a re-instatement of an academic
qualification attained by the most prestigious school alumni, those feature
film directors and award-winning technicians whose names are referred to over
and over again when the school’s achievements are being broadcast. The
CEOs of the institution covered by the period for which statistics and records
have been examined through to the present were John O’Hara
(1989-1995), Rod Bishop (1996-2003), Malcolm Long (2003-2007) and Sandra Levy.(2007-2015
Never mind that. Since then, there has been
the appointment of a new CEO to follow Sandra Levy, (CEO from 2007-2015), The announcement of Neil Peplow’s
appointment took a seeming eternity and he has yet to take up his duties at
least in situ. Peplow had formerly worked at AFTRS for three years from
2010-2014 before heading back to London to a position as number two at The Met Film School based at London’s Ealing
Studios. His AFTRS appointment is his first gig as a CEO.
The reason for the delay in announcing his
appointment was subject of much gossip and speculation as to who and why but
more recently as the gossip leaks out the delay has been sheeted home to the
chaotic Cabinet appointment processes in the Prime Minister’s private office.
The story now being put about is that George Brandis, the Arts Minister,
apparently did not seek to intervene in the appointment notwithstanding much
scuttlebutt to that effect going round during the weeks and eventually months
it took before the appointment was announced.
Brandis’s private office did not help this
process by putting out ludicrously self-contradictory statements to any
enquirers to the effect that the AFTRS Act allowed the Board to make the
appointment but that Senator Brandis as Arts Minister would ‘approve it’. The spinelessness of those who might
have been able to clarify quite simply these matters as they unfolded was duly
noted.
The appointment
of Peplow followed in the wake of the somewhat surprise and near instant exit
from the building of Ben Gibson some
9 months into the job. “After nearly 13 years devoted to educating and
developing talented filmmakers, first at the helm of the London Film School and
more recently here at AFTRS, Ben has decided to pursue his passion for the
industry through other avenues.” So
went the announcement way back in May. For
a period of time AFTRS was planning to survive without either a CEO or its head
of Degree Programs. Worse things can happen I suppose.
The AFTRS story
continued with a recent piece in The Hollywood Reporter, similar to a piece
in the Hollywood Reporter last year, both of which nominated AFTRS as one of
the top Film Schools in the world. But the mutterings about what was happening
at AFTRS occasioned by the hiring and exiting of the head of the Degree Program before
even the completion of a year of the new program, Sandra Levy’s departure and
the delay in the new CEO’s appointment have caused some consternation about
what’s happening at the venerable institution. In the absence of any expressed
vision from the school itself, the consternation has begun to focus especially
on what AFTRS has actually been doing over the last decade when it abandoned
its Degree Program, and whether it has allowed standards to slip, lost sight of
its primary objectives, failed to produce any film-makers of note and
degenerated in its teaching into a soft TAFE-like institution offering courses
of high cost to the taxpayer who funds the institution but low value to the
industry and the society into which the scores of certificate holders head.
Some measuring
sticks AFTRS began
life as an elite institution intended to find and develop the most talented
would-be film-makers. Much has always been made of that extraordinary group of
young people who were in the first so-called Interim class designed to get the
thing up and moving including Phillip Noyce, Gillian Armstrong, Chris Noonan,
Graham Shirley and James Ricketson. Whoever conducted the search for would be
students did an amazing job. Later years saw a panoply of talent find its way
to the school and benefit from the national largesse involved in training of
the highest order. There was much envy at the resources, physical and
financial, devoted to AFTRS from film schools in the outlying states which had
to battle on with much more limited resources. But such is the way for elite
training institutions.
Among the
initiatives for which AFTRS could devote resources was that for the dedicated
training of indigenous film-makers, initially held in 1991, 1993 and 1994. Over
the next seven years AFTRS trained a whole generation of Indigenous filmmakers
including Rachel Perkins, Warwick Thornton, Ivan Sen, Catriona McKenzie, Adrian
Wills, Beck Cole, Steve McGregor and Darlene Johnson – all of whom were
selected for the immersive, conservatory-type training courses in merit-based competition
along with other applicants.
What was
achieved? Well, this may smack of a bias towards elitism, but what was being
aimed at was the production of film-makers who would make the highest quality
films. They would win international as well as local prizes. They would be
invited to the world’s great film competitions, in Europe most especially,
where each year perhaps fifty films are identified by the international program
selectors and endorsed by the international critical and distribution communities
as the best on offer for this moment of time. This is an expensive process and
one fraught with risk at many steps. A poor or sub-standard faculty,
unsympathetic administrators, reductions in government funding and lots of
other external factors can seriously and continuously blight an institution’s
general level of achievement.
People are now
taking a serious look at just what AFTRS did in the distant past and what it’s
up to now as a new CEO arrives to take charge at a time when the school, from
the start of 2015,apparently headed in a new direction.
So here is a
list to assist this contemplation (you have to love lists) gathered from all
the available information including the admittedly (by AFTRS Alumni section)
not up to date school website
Feature film
directors graduating from AFTRS between 1993 to 2002
1993
Peter Duncan – Children of the Revolution,
1996; A Little Bit of Soul,
1998; Passion, 1999; Unfinished Sky, 2007
Daniel Krige – West, 2007; Inhuman Resources, 2012
Andrew Lancaster – Accidents Happen, 2009;
Rowan Woods – The Boys, 1998; Little Fish 2005, Winged Creatures, 2009
1994
Robert Connolly – The Bank, 2001; Three Dollars, 2005; Balibo, 2009, The Turning, 2014, Paper Planes, 2015
Sam Lang – The Well, 1997; Monkey’s Mask, 2000; L’Idole, 2002
Craig Monahan, The
Interview, 1998; Peaches,
2003, Healing, 2014
Daniel Nettheim, Angst,
2000; The Hunter, 2011
1995
Tony McNamara – The Rage in Placid Lake,
2003; Ashby, 2015
Anna Reeves – Oyster Farmer, 2004
Warwick Thornton – Samson
and Delilah, 2009
1996
Rachel Perkins – Radiance, 1999; One Night The Moon, 2001; Bran Nue Dae, 2009,
Michael James Rowland – Lucky Miles, 2007
Mark Forstmann – Monkey Puzzles, 2007
Martin Murphy – Lost Things,
2004
1997
Adam Blaiklock – Caught Inside, 2011
Ivan Sen – Beneath Clouds,
2002; Dreamland, 2009; Toomelah, 2011, Mystery Road, 2014
1998
---
1999
Louise Alston – All My Friends are leaving Brisbane,
2007; Jucy, 2001
Serhat Caradee – Cedar Boys, 2008
Kim Farrant – Strangerland, 2015
Cate Shortland – Somersault,
2004; Lore, 2012
2000
Sean Byrne – The Loved Ones, 2009; The Devil’s Candy, 2015
Tony Krawitz – Dead Europe, 2012
Claire McCarthy – Cross Life, 2007; The Waiting City, 2009
Catriona McKenzie, Satellite Boy, 2012
Steve Pasvolsky – Deck Dogz, 2004
2001
Peter Carstairs – September, 2009
Beck Cole – Here I Am,
2011
2002
Rupert Glasson - Coffin Rock,
2009; What Lola Wants,
2015
And here is
another list from 2003 to 2012 (again
gathered from all the available information including the admittedly not up to
date AFTRS website.)
2003
Alister Grierson – Kokoda,
2006; Sanctum, 2010
2004
---
2005
Dean Francis – Road Kill, 2009; Drown, 2015
Granaz Moussaui – My Tehran For
Sale, 2010
2006
---
2007
---
2008
---
2009
---
2010
---
2011
---
2012
---
I think you might be getting the picture of
what concerns some of those who look to AFTRS for the continuing production of
high quality talented individuals who will go on to participate in the cutting
edge area of film production.
Now as these thoughts have been shopped
around and discussed there have been some comments made. One of them suggests
that another way to measure success is to
look at the time taken between graduation and making a feature film.
Here’s a list of AFTRS graduates from 1993 -
2012 who directed a feature within five years of graduation:
Peter Duncan – 3 years
Alister Grierson - 3 years
Alister Grierson - 3 years
Rowan Woods – 5 years
Sam Lang – 3 years
Craig Monahan – 4 years
Rachel Perkins – 3 years
Ivan Sen – 5 years
Cate Shortland – 5 years
Steve Pasvolsky – 3 years
Dean Francis – 4 years
Granaz Moussaui – 5 years
In total, 21 graduates directed a film within 10
years of graduation in the 1993 – 2003 period, compared with 3 graduates in the
2003-2012 period. No AFTRS graduate between 2006 and 2012 has made a
feature
Another factor should not be ignored. In the
2003 – 2012 period, low-budget/no-budget digital feature production became a
reality. However, there is no evidence of any AFTRS graduate taking this up as
an alternative funding pathway.
So, hopefully without labouring the point,
let me summarise this: In the ten
years between 1993 and 2002, the School produced 29 graduates who have directed
55 feature films.
In the ten years between 2003 and 2012,
the School produced 3 graduates who have directed 5 feature films.
Since 2012, the school has not kept proper
records, a matter it says it is rectifying, so any data that might affect these
notes is not publicly available.
What is to be done.
The questions for Neil Peplow are
interesting. A major change in the school’s activity was instituted at the
start of 2015. Given the turmoil behind appointing a Head of Degree Programs
and then seeing off that person in less than a year, it’s hard to see any
change in the mindset of what’s currently being done. A new group of graduates
will be through the school by the end of 2017 which might afford the
opportunity to take stock and see just what has been achieved. None however
will have directed a feature film and given past experience even among the best
and brightest this could be five to ten years away.
As always, the thought arises, it would be so good to have a simple way of accessing all those films by those young directors, backed up by a simple access to information about them.
ReplyDeleteInteresting that considering directors in the 93-02 period only were 1/10 of the student population you have chosen to gauge the success of AFTRS only upon them?
ReplyDeleteWell, I think that's the judgement. If Film Schools aren't producing seriously talented directors then the money is not being well spent. In that period AFTRS produced all those directors who have since gone on to make 55 feature films, with more than a few major prize-winners among them. That talent production line has trailed off quite dramatically in recent years.
ReplyDelete