|
Terence Davies |
1. In a year of groupthink ― on every side, and at every level―the
antidote could be found in two portraits of extreme individualists, who were
also two of the best-known recluses in American history: Terence Davies' A
Quiet Passion, with Cynthia Nixon all exposed nerves as Emily Dickinson,
and Warren Beatty's Rules Don't Apply, with Beatty tweaking his own
progressive admirers as far-right tycoon Howard Hughes.
|
Warren Beatty |
From a common-sense
perspective these films couldn't be further apart: A Quiet Passion proposes
that an outwardly tranquil, chaste existence can be as intense and fraught as
any other, while Rules Don't Apply glories in Hughes' reputation as a
seducer to rival Beatty himself. Still, both are reckless acts of imaginative
identification, rooted in the unfashionable notion that the only creed or code
worth having is a personal one.
2. While cinema had a lot of competition this year, most of the larger
spectacle that gripped us all was more depressing than pleasurable. That said,
the continued potency of old-fashioned live TV was demonstrated when a
typically dreary Academy Awards ceremony descended into farce―a moment of
catharsis to delight viewers across the planet, with Beatty, still in the
performance-art mode of Rules Don't Apply, as the instrument if not the
deliberate instigator. “To hell with dreams,” the crucial line from Barry
Jenkins' subsequent acceptance speech for Moonlight, might be the
greatest four words ever spoken at the Oscars.
|
Donald Trump |
Dominating everything, of course, was the tragicomic reality show Trump
in the White House, supple-mented later in the year by Harvey Weinstein's
appearance in a remake of Beauty and the Beast less sugarcoated than
either Disney version, the pilot of a series destined to run and run. This last
development had nothing and everything to do with cinephilia, forcing attention
to some unpleasant truths about how movies are made and to the question of
exactly what and who might be worth defending. Where Weinstein's downfall is a
blessing on all fronts, I hope we're given the chance to make up our own minds
about I Love You, Daddy―the last we're likely to hear in a while from
the disgraced Louis CK, a major talent whose 2016 web-series Horace and Pete,
an unsparing allegory about the inevitable collapse of patriarchy, now
resonates more than ever.
|
The Emoji Movie |
3. Hollywood's own collapse is probably still decades away, but
there's no doubt the magic is fading: even the most sophisticated new
blockbusters, like Blade Runner 2049 or The Last Jedi, depend on
spells that lessen in power each time they're cast. For now, most of the
liveliness in American pop culture is on the fringes, in parodies that flaunt
their cynicism and inauthenticity, drawing one way or another from the online
realm which supplies our most plausible glimpses of the future. In this field,
everybody's touchstones will be different: mine include Tony Leondis' dystopian
The Emoji Movie, Joseph Kahn's playfully de-stabilising Taylor Swift
music videos, and Tyler MacIntyre's Marquis de Sade update Tragedy Girls,
a celebration of youthful evil at least as audacious as Bertrand Bonello's Nocturama.
|
Landscape from Lower Parel |
4. At the Mumbai Film Festival in October, I spend ninety minutes
being ferried across town in heavy traffic and arrive late for CCTV
Landscape From Lower Parel, an “expanded cinema” presentation by the local
artists' collective Camp―part of the festival's The New Medium strand, which also
includes a wide-ranging retrospective of found footage films (or, as curator
and Camp member Shaina Anand prefers to say, simply “footage films”). The venue
for the presentation is a multiplex cinema on the upper level of a shopping
complex in a converted textile mill; Anand and her colleagues take turns
reading from a prepared text about the history of the area, while the screen
shows live images from a remotely controlled security camera mounted on the
roof.
The camera pans and zooms over the surrounding terrain, including the
streets and buildings I glimpsed on the drive over: miming trajectories
described in the text (like the descent of a hot air balloon), singling out
tiny figures on rooftops or in office windows, following birds across the sky.
It's a simple but powerful way of highlighting the omnipresence of surveillance
in the modern city: when an audience member raises concerns about privacy,
Anand points out that each of us would have been filmed by multiple security
cameras on our way into the theatre. It's also the realisation of a seemingly
impossible cinephile dream: that of simultaneously remaining safe in the
theatre and existing inside a movie that comes into being as you watch.
|
David Lynch |
5. At the risk of indulging in groupthink myself, I can only echo the
testimony of other contributors to this series: Twin Peaks, Twin
Peaks, Twin Peaks. For all the good writing which the long-awaited
third season has already sparked, no critic can hope to illuminate more than a
fraction of David Lynch's unfathomable masterpiece, whether they concentrate on
the elusive big picture or on the sheer strangeness―in conventional terms, the wrongness―of
Lynch's tiniest directorial choices. Almost in passing, the show annihilates all
remaining distinctions between film and television, as well as those between
high and low culture: quite literally, it's both an epic of avant-garde cinema
and a TV soap opera, and almost everything in between.
There is not much I can helpfully add, except that the entire Peaks
saga―three seasons to date, plus the 1992 big-screen prequel Fire Walk With
Me―demands to be viewed as a single, open-ended work. If you're coming to
it fresh, your best bet is to start with the 1990 pilot and keep going right on
through, ignoring whatever you may have heard about the supposed weaknesses of
the second season. Pack provisions, bring a friend, and try to stay ready for
anything. Be warned, though: once you enter these woods, you may not want to
get out.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.