Raoul Walsh |
Albert Edward (“Raoul”) Walsh was born of
Irish ancestry in New York City in 1887. A dedicated painter, sometime novelist and
lover of Shakespeare, even more than Ford and Hawks, Walsh loved to tell a good
story, interweaving myth and fiction into accounts of his upbringing in New
York, Texas and Montana and a trip to Cuba at age 15 on his uncle's schooner,
times spent on a ranch in Texas, as a cowboy breaking horses, and later acting
on the stage. This was part of the process according to his biographer Marilyn
Moss, of “reliving adventures he either took or imagined.” He finally ended up
in Hollywood in 1912 working as an actor and assistant to D W Griffith (he
played John Wilkes Booth in The Birth of a Nation) directing the
battle scenes when Griffith was unable to direct himself in a feature length The
Life of Villa (1915) in Mexico with renegade general Pancho Villa playing
himself. Walsh described him as “a camera louse” referring to Villa's behaviour
such as actually executing prisoners by firing squad for the camera.
Walsh as John Wilkes Booth, The Birth of a Nation |
John Wayne, The Big Trail |
Looking to find a new screen presence at
short notice to play the lead role in The Big Trail Walsh was impressed
by the then 'nature boy' male beauty, grace of movement and apparent physical
strength of a props assistant, Marion Morrison (renamed John – he preferred
Duke - Wayne by Walsh), with whom John Ford was friendly but unlike Walsh was
not convinced enough about his friend's on-screen potential to launch him into
an acting career. At that time, Garry Wills suggests, Ford tended to be
attracted to actors of a more muscular build like George O'Brien who played the
male lead in The Iron Horse. Strongly resenting Walsh's casting of Wayne
(Ford did not speak to him for three years afterwards), it was nearly a decade
before Ford gave him his chance in Stagecoach (1939). Ford's
jealousy was further fuelled when Walsh cast the now successfully launched
Wayne in Dark Command (1940) (1). Wayne remained unimpressed by
Walsh's uncharacteristically violent and vindictive attitude towards some of
his crew on The Big Trail whom Walsh felt were paying undue attention to
his wife-to-be (Lorraine Walker) with whom he was then having an affair. Wayne
did not appear again in a Walsh film.
Ward Bond, Errol Flynn, Gentleman Jim |
Walsh
worked with Cagney and Bogart on seven films located in a world of crime,
corruption and gangsterism, the two starring together in The Roaring
Twenties (1939) as gangsters challenging fate,“a view of the world in which
the downtrodden tough it out, even though that does not ensure success or
happiness, a theme that Walsh and (Warner Bros.) crafted well” (Moss). In They
Drive By Night (1940) Bogart and Raft play small operators blocked
by the big guys from bettering themselves “going from hard knocks to tragedy.”
Walsh had an on going friendship with Bogart referring to the actor's penchant
for complaining on the set by affectionately calling him “Bogey the Beefer.”
Bogart, Cagney, The Roaring Twenties |
Virginia Mayo, Cagney, White Heat |
Ida Lupino was one of Walsh's favourite
actresses although initially she was not his first choice but that of the
producer, Mark Hellinger, for the role of Lana in They Drive By Night
the first of four films he made with her. Walsh got on well with her and they
followed up with High Sierra (1941). The havoc released by the the
madness of the Lupino character in Drive was tacked on to the main theme
and won Lupino a seven year contract with Warner Bros. Moss suggests that the
role in the film “bore an uncanny resemblance to (the havoc) brought on by the
first Mrs Walsh” which may have been an ironic coincidence since Lupino's
character also resembles a psychotic wife played by Bette Davis in a 1935
Warners film Bordertown.
Ida Lupino, Robert Alda, The Man I Love |
Clark Gable, The Tall Men |
Jayne Russell, The Revolt of Mamie Stover |
Marilyn Moss sees the relationship between
the characters played by Bogart and Lupino in High Sierra as “the
personification of Walsh's own vulnerability at the centre of the most crucial
Walshian narrative: the love between a man and a woman.” What might be more to
the point is how such a near universal theme transmutes into something more
specifically Walshian. This might have be found in what was his aversion to
psychological complexity with his characters nonetheless entrapped in a
romantic undercurrent he liked to hide beneath the surface tempo of the action.
Walsh believed that he could handle almost any genre, Moss suggests, “since he
was confident that he could supply the emotional and physical action to keep
the story moving and make it entertaining.”
Wayne, Claire Trevor, Dark Command |
Walsh's existential immersion in the process
of making films in the studio system, alluded to above, seems to have reached
something of an apotheosis at Warner Bros through the forties. This is apparent
in his astonishingly productive run at Warner Bros, almost certainly unequalled
in the history of classical Hollywood. From 1939-51 Walsh directed at least 17
out of 25 (68%) now critically valued works in established genres, including
high points such as The Roaring Twenties, They Drive By Night,
High Sierra, The Strawberry Blonde, Gentleman Jim, Objective
Burma, Pursued, The Man I Love, Colorado Territory, White
Heat and Distant Drums. For the balance of 44 features that Walsh
directed from 1929-64, in a variety of production contexts, at least 12 (27%)
have lasting critical value including The Big Trail, Me and My Gal, The
Bowery, The World in His Arms, Battle Cry and The Tall Men.
By Hollywood standards Warners, during this
period the most liberal of the studios, was a strong supporter of Roosevelt's
New Deal often reflected in the relatively progressive content of the films.
Walsh as a contract director had the opportunity of working with intelligently
liberal producers and a range of similarly talented writers. Above all, was the
special compatibility Walsh enjoyed with the Studio's contract players he was
consistently able to work with in the years at Warners which were never in
basic conflict with his notions of individualism.This would seem to have erased
the apparent conflict between the director's ethical and political conservatism
(Walsh was a staunch Republican, close friend of William Randolph Hearst and
supporter of his isolationist policies in the thirties) and the centre-left
politics of key personnel in the production teams (4).
Jean-Pierre Coursodon challenges some of the
critical orthodoxies surrounding Walsh's career, notably that the claim that
Walsh was “a master of the adventure, the archetypal action film, has not only
been overworked, it has also contributed to obscure other equally important
aspects of his cinema.” (Barrett Hodsdon does address the latter). I concur
with Coursodon that the Warners pictures were by no means typical of those of
the earlier (the thirties) or later (fifties and sixties) periods of Walsh's
filmmaking. These films are generally more leisurely paced and loosely
structured, at times showing signs of casualness on the part of the director
which may be a sign of tension between the material assigned (particularly in
the thirties) and his engagement with it.
Walsh vehemently shrugged off any notion of
the artist in his filmmaking, seemingly immersing himself intuitively and at
times spontaneously in living through the making of a film. Moss comments that
Walsh never wanted to talk about, or be praised for creating complex characters
being “more interested in talking about the mechanics of a camera setup, the
aesthetics of creating a bit of action” and the film's overall production. When
he was fully engaged the romanticism in his creativity found expression through
his audacious sense of space and a commitment to the energy and rhythm of a
linear narrative driving forward, most evident in the forties Warner's cycle.
At his most engaged there is also a vulnerability evident in Walsh's
sensitivity to nuance and a fondness for the hard-boiled and good-hearted in
combining humour in a more hard-nosed trajectory striving for what he saw as a
form of (masculine) authenticity. Barrett Hodsdon suggests that Walsh seemed to
live each moment of creation “as though it were the act of breathing itself.”
He lived for the shared camaraderie in working as much on preproduction as on a
film set, more so on location, even if the material did not especially engage
him.
1. While it's speculation, Ford's obvious jealousy likely arose from his
feeling of inferiority seeing Walsh as a threat, to quote Garry Wills – “the
kind of guy Ford admired - “a 'man's man', a wit and a practical joker, a
heterosexual swashbuckler- who turned up on the set each day with a gorgeous
blonde on his arm” as Harry Carey Jr reported Walsh did during the filming of Pursued
1947)
2. The second of two key films Walsh based on fictionalisations of
historical figures, the other being General George Custer (also played by
Flynn) in They Died With Their Boots On (1941).
3. The fourth film is A Lion is in the Streets (1953), produced by
the star's brother William Cagney, is adapted from a novel loosely based on the
life of corrupt populist southern politician and demagogue, Huey Long.
4. Walsh was a liberal in his attitude to minorities. He employed them on
his films whenever possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.