Sylvia Lawson, scholar, critic and
author writes in response to Tony Buckley’s
Proposal
to ensure the future of the National Film & Sound Archive. (Sylvia’s current reviews may be found at Inside Story.)
Dear Geoff
Please add my name to the list
of signatories to the proposed agenda for the NFSA. I salute Tony for his
persistent drive on this.
I have one rather important reservation: I don't think a revived and
expanded Archive should have its principal base in Sydney, nor in any
other state capital, though of course it should have offices and appropriate
representation in all states and territories.
The NFSA, like the National Gallery, the National Museum and the
National Library among other major institutions, should be based in the
national capital, as is appropriate to its status - or rather, to the status it
ought to have. Its present location is in the most beautiful building in
Canberra, and this location should be retained. It has been developed and
expanded over the past few decades for its purposes, and that could well
continue.
Even if the large sums of money involved in re-location and new
building could be found, I suggest that they're needed far more urgently for
staff and public programmes, the areas which, after recent major cuts, will
need restoring.
You are right to point to the comparative governmental neglect of the
NFSA by comparison with the treatment of the NGA, NLA and others (although all
cultural institutions have suffered unduly under the present regime). I
have written, and will probably write again, on the comparative lack of
cachet accorded by government to film and audio-visual media in general.
I suggest that Tony's proposals should be the subject of meetings at the
Archive, in Sydney, Melbourne and elsewhere, wherever concerned film makers,
film users, teachers and others can gather.
Best
wishes
Sylvia Lawson
23 April 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.