Editor’s Note: What
follows are two separate comments on this film. Different levels of enthusiasm about the elements are on display. My own view is first.
The intro
for the daytime screening of Aki Kaurasmaki’s The Other Side of Hope mentioned that this was the first of the Finnish
master’s films to screen at an SFF for twenty years. Lest you think that a whole host of films have been overlooked in fact four feature films
slipped the net in that time and two of those The Man Without a Past (2002) and Le Havre (2011) had commercial seasons. Kaurasmaki occupied himself as well with a
handful of short films made for inclusion in omnibus features, and a
documentary.
But what's to worry about? Kaurasmaki,
some might say, makes the same film over and over again. His characters have
the same demeanour and they say very little. He has a reliable stock company of actors, many of them now with sagging faces and, in the case of the males, lank and thinning hair. In the opening of this new film he
introduces two strands of story and keeps them apart for maybe half the picture. First involves a travelling salesman who sells shirts and drives a big black near-vintage car.
Without a word he leaves his wife and sells up his small business. He buys a
rundown restaurant and inherits three grumpy staff members whom the previous
owner has ripped off for wages owing.
Parallel to
this a Syrian refugee lands unexpectedly in Finland. He has become separated
from his sister. He hands himself in, seeks asylum and ends up in a detention
centre. It’s not the first time Kaurasmaki has dealt with the displaced but I
suspect that such meticulous attention to the detail of processing has rarely
been laid out. Kaurasmaki asks us to respect the difficult job the cops and the
centre staff have to do. (It’s not something you could ever extend to the local
equivalents where pathological hatred, violence and brutality, almost certainly endorsed if not
ordered by the authorities, are the norm and multi-national companies run by
pillars of society make much money for their shareholders by 'caring' for the unfortunates. I’ve been wanting to
say that somewhere on this blog for some time.)
Inevitably
the lives of the two collide. The hard-hearted businessman finds the escaped refugee living in his garbage bins and immediately offers
him a job, notwithstanding that he has a constant struggle to get his restaurant into workable shape. Eventually it is converted to a sushi place and attracts busloads of Japanese tourists. What
the tourists make of the amount of wasabi mustard slathered all over the top of
the fish, a scene which drew howls, is not shown.
I’m not
giving anything away in mentioning the sort of happy ending. I am also not
giving anything away in paying tribute to the sensational music track, played
by a half dozen groups and individuals, all well past middle age but sure able
to make music to dream about. Kaurasmaki’s relaxation allows him to put the
musicians on screen for as long as the songs go. Nice.... and a genuine hit.
Sherwan Haji (Khaled), Sakari Kuosmanen (Wikström) |
Although this is a feature film, in the typical
style of this director, this is shown in a fairly emotionless but very calm
way. He doesn't intrude directly with his own particular values but it does
seem to describe very adequately the attitude of the Finns and their behaviour
and leaves it to us to decide.
Given that practically every film under the sun
is, by the time it gets to a festival like the SFF, is written up by just about
every reliable media source on the net imaginable I prefer not to make too many
"spoiler alerts" if I can. The plotline concerns two radically
different people whose lives, of course (!) intersect and this is the
significant ongoing plotline of the film. But it is not the only plotline. The
original, more serious and in my view rather more interesting plotline is that
of Aleppo, Syrian "refugee",Khaled, his escape to Finland and his
dealings with the Finnish immigration/refugee service. It is full of
information.
The second concerns a deeply withdrawn late
middle-aged businessman, Wikström, a travelling shirt salesman and because of a
difficult economy, trading poorly, with the yen to buy a restaurant. He is
invariably presented in a suit with shirt and tie and collar buttoned. In fact
he's very buttoned up, perhaps partly from personality and perhaps
significantly also from the failed marriage. His wife (whom he leaves early in
the film) is alcoholic. I presume there is some purpose in the fact that he
drives around in a very elderly Checker, an American cab, long since out of
production and originally much beloved of airport taxi services with the build
construction of a Sherman tank. In the Finnish environment this would be
ruinously expensive to run, so its inclusion, must have some purpose, but what
it does for the plotline, I have no idea.
Khaled escapes from the refugee/incarceration
area, his application for refugee status denied, even when the film displays
clear evidence that his hometown Aleppo is manifestly dangerous. The two
characters described above meet in the garbage area behind the restaurant
recently purchased by Wikström. The purchase of this restaurant seems
extraordinarily contrived. It is clearly going nowhere and Wikström it is also
clearly no fool. Khaled claims the garbage space as his "bedroom" and
the two men fight. This scene blacks out to be replaced by one in which, inside
the restaurant, a famished Khaled is fed by the owner and his staff. From what
has gone on before, this kindness – I suppose an extension of the general
Finnish attitude to refugees – seems very artificial.
But it proceeds apace and the restaurant
provides opportunities for some laughs. In between this relatively gentle
humour is Khaled's concern for his remaining family, only a sister. The final
scene is of Khaled sitting by water, the ocean or a river I'm not sure which,
reflecting on – well, I don't know. The events that have happened to him
immediately prior, would not in my opinion provoke what Khaled has done.
There are a number of representative trademarks
of this director in the film, particularly the 50s –60s decor of the restaurant
and the limited dialogue. In this director's work dialogue describes "what
is", not "what should be", nor "why". There is overreliance
on music, all played by pub musicians, who, whatever skills they possess, are
certainly not very commercially viable. The music is (as best as I can guess
it) a sort of Finnish version of electric rockabilly. Most if not all the music
sequences don't add to the film at all in terms of development of plot and are
in the main, too long.
In my considered view, this is a quite pleasant
and adequate film. It is however a Silver Bear award winner from the Berlin
Festival and that must certainly count for something as a contrary view to my
fairly indifferent review.
the wry humour in this film was beautifully deadpan . What a joy to see it on the big screen with a responsive audience. It has the most amusing scene I've seen in any film of SFF '17....when Kahled emerges after being hidden with dog. How better to solve world crises?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete