George Brandis handling pressure |
Paddy has
discovered one film industry related case in point, the appointment of the next
Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Film and Television School. The story
is spelt out in a little detail on the link provided above. The Act of
Parliament (1973) governing the AFTRS clearly states in S24 (1): “There shall be a Director of the School, who shall be
appointed by the Governor‑General on the recommendation of the Council.”.
What attracts attention in Paddy’s piece about this particular appointment process
is the advice he was given when preparing his story that “…The Minister for the
Arts will approve the final
appointment but will not be actively involved in the initial process of
assessment and recommendation but that he did not wish to comment on any other
aspects of the process.” (That’s my underlining.)
This ought to be of
interest to those who want AFTRS to be as good as it possibly can be because it
would seem to imply that George Brandis can exercise a veto over the
appointment. Why he would want to take such action is mysterious given the
process that has been followed and which Paddy spells out. As for "active
involvement" whether any delicate negotiations about the final nominee
have taken place between Brandis, his private office, his various Departments
(the statement quoted above was made by a spokesperson for the
Attorney-General’s Department, not the Department of the Arts), and the Council
and officers of the AFTRS is of course not known. Maybe there's nothing to see
here or maybe things will never be known. There's just enough slippery language
here to make you want someone to press the issue with George when Senate
Estimates come round just to see if he thinks he really can intervene in any
way in the appointment. If he does believe that it would be something with
serious ramifications for other agencies in his portfolio which have similar
provisions for the appointment of a Chief Executive.
That
seemed interesting enough. Then AFTRS decided to let go its head of Degree Programs Ben Gibson. Then....nothing. Notwithstanding
that Sandra Levy’s appointment comes to an end in twenty days, nada, niente,
rien du tout. Do I make myself clear. In
the spirit of Woodward & Bernstein, Film Alert decided to take on the powers
that be and investigate this matter. The following questions were sent to
George Brandis’s office requesting immediate attention.
When does Senator
Brandis expect to make an announcement of the AFTRS CEO?
Has Senator Brandis
personally met or interviewed the proposed candidate? If not Does Senator
Brandis intend to meet or interview the proposed AFTRS CEO before submitting
the name to the G-G for the signing of the instrument of appointment?
Is it intended that
the Prime Minister will meet the intended appointee before the instrument is
submitted to the G-G? Has such a meeting taken place?
Simple enough you might say. So after first getting no
answer and then being advised that an out-of-office acknowledgement may have
been sent, I was promised an answer. And that’s what I got. viz this
reply received from Amy Symons, Arts Communication Advisor from the
Attorney-General’s Department (talk about getting to the top, no I wont)
Anyway Amy advises:
The
Australian Film, Television and Radio School (AFTRS) is currently conducting a
recruitment process for the position of Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
As AFTRS
is a Government agency within the arts portfolio, the Minister for the Arts
will approve the final appointment but will not be actively involved in the
initial process of assessment and recommendation.
Under
legislation (Australian Film, Television and Radio School Act 1973) the CEO is
appointed by the Governor-General on the recommendation of the AFTRS Council.
Amazingly it is the same answer as was given to Paddy Gourley lo all those weeks ago,
This is in
fact wrong in several material respects and causes me to state the following.
1.
AFTRS is
NOT currently conducting a recruitment process. It has in fact done that long
ago and submitted the result to the Attorney-General/Arts Minister
2.
The AFTRS
ACT has no provision which allows for the Minister to ‘approve’ the appointment
3.
Just in
case you hadn’t noticed, Amy has not answered any of my questions.
4.
Film Alert
has been belted out of the ball park.
5.
This will
be remembered.
I'm surprised she didn't add that the government has an open mind on the future of AFTRS, however, should it decide at some stage in the future that it is necessary or desirable to alter the CEO appointment process, it may prepare legislation in relation to this or any other relevant matter(s) for due consideration by both Houses Of Parliament.
ReplyDelete