Hello Everyone
The last Film Alert drew attention to a few things related to the
history, both cultural and economic, of the Australian film industry. There was
Margaret Pomeranz’s selection of the ten best Australian films ever made and
some pointers to a serious piece of academic
about the audience for Australian cinema. It brought some responses
which I’m pleased to publish. It also caused me to start publishing on the the Film Alert blog lists
of the Best Ever Australian Films submitted randomly by friends and acquaintances
from all over. Anyone who wants to send in a list (minimum ten but no maximum,
shorts and docos may be included) will have it posted forthwith.
So, first, Andrew
Pike, Award-winning Producer, Director, Distributor, Historian and Scholar,
has been pondering the various matters raised about the current state of the
Australian cinema. Here are his thoughts.
I often feel I should engage in more debate about the Australian film
industry but never get to do it. Partly because it is a dispiriting
scene, with deckchairs constantly being shuffled, and partly because I feel
completely marginalised by the key players, as though an independent
distributor (let alone a small outfit in Canberra) could have anything
worthwhile to say. In the end, I usually decide to keep working away
doing my own thing, like a Ronin should, and ignore the rest.
But a few points can perhaps be made:
1. I think the narrow frame of reference of lists such as
Margaret's has to be sheeted home to the failure over many years of the NFSA to
make Australian film heritage visible and available. I have faith that at
last this failure is being addressed and will be remedied.
2. I firmly believe that no solution to the economic
well-being of the film industry can ever be achieved until "fair and
equitable" terms and conditions can be negotiated with the major
exhibitors and distributors. Until that day, which may never come, since
few people are brave enough to tackle the problem, let alone even talk about it
publicly, the only solution is a strong and resilient independent sector,
especially the "art house" component where risks will more readily be
taken. And the indie "art house" cinema sector has been slowly
but steadily disappearing.
3. I get very impatient with all of the agonised analyses of
what is wrong with the industry and with Australian scripts and Australian
writers, when the fact remains that often extremely bad American films get
major releases here. Refer to point 2 above. In addition, instead
of analysing what people think is wrong with the industry, why not analyse the
occasions when Australian films HAVE actually work at the box-office - has
anyone really studied why RED DOG worked, or looked closely at the marketing
campaigns for MURIEL'S WEDDING, or MAO'S LAST DANCER, or KENNY, or for that
matter any of the ones that Ronin was involved in a long time ago.
It seems that the successes are usually seen as blips on the radar,
exceptions to the rule, and so not worthy of investigation. In the end,
despite the analyses of the failures, does everyone subconsciously believe that
to succeed you need luck, pure and simple luck?
Andrew
Film Impact Ratings – Measuring the Success of
Australian Films This matter is a little
more esoteric than Andrew’s cri de coeur.
As mentioned previously, one of the great and ongoing debates about Australian film
concerns the extent of the domestic audience for our feature film production.
Consideration of the issue is inevitably bound up with thoughts about the type
of films we make and the policy settings for Government assistance and subsidy.
I referred to a recent paper titled Australian films at large: expanding the
evidence about Australian cinema performance. The paper can be found online
here.
The
complete note can be found online at the
Film Alert website and you can find it on the Film Alert website here . Any
comments received will be passed on and published next time.
Film Critics Circle Awards Night – Reminder and Invitation
to all
The
Annual Critics Awards for Australian Films of 2014 will take place on
Tuesday
10th March 2015 - 6.30pm for 7pm at Paddington/Woollahra RSL Oxford Street,
Paddington Opposite Paddington Town Hall
Bookings
via Email: FilmCriticsAust@bigpond.com
Pay at
Door: Please Note Cash only No Credit Card facilities
Cost
Per Head: $15.00Members of Industry Guilds: $10.00 Light Supper/Finger Food
included.
( And in
case you thought all this was happens by sleight of hand, the FCCA Awards
receive sponsorship and other assistance from FOXTEL, UNIVERSAL PICTURES, ACS, KARMEE
COFFEE, AUSTRALIAN WRITERS IN PRINT,
CURRENCY PRESS & FILMINK)
Women’s Gaze and the
Feminist Film Archive, Panel 1.30pm-3pm
There doesn’t seem to be a
website about this event so I’m reduced to reproducing a large chunk of stuff
that could otherwise be linked to. Filmmakers Martha Ansara, Margot Nash and
Jeni Thornley return to their feminist origins and discuss some of the
groundbreaking films they produced in the 1970s. Individual presentations will
include clips from Film For Discussion (Martha Ansara with the Sydney
Women’s Film Group 1973), We Aim To Please (Robin Laurie and Margot Nash
1976) and Maidens (Jeni Thornley 1978).
Joining them is emerging
filmmaker, Natalie Krikowa, who suggests that these pioneering women laid the
foundations upon which a new generation of feminist filmmakers, like her, now
stand. Other key films from the period - My Survival as an Aboriginal (Essie
Coffey 1978), Size 10 (Sarah Gibson and Susan Lambert 1978) and For
Love or Money (Megan McMurchy, Margot Nash, Margot Oliver and Jeni
Thornley 1983) will also be discussed.
The panel highlights the
importance of recognising Australian women’s film history by working towards
the creation of a digital-online space, providing scholars and film-arts-media
related organisations with an invaluable research and study tool. Film scholar
Sarah Attfield will chair the session. Co-ordinator and contact: Sarah
Attfield (m) 0430134828 Sarah.Attfield@uts.edu.au
Oscar and After To cheer all the cinephiles up here’s a link to
some new research on yet another Orson Welles project that went nowhere. Orson Welles. It’s written by
Australian scholar Matthew Asprey Gear and appears in Gary Morris’s ever-
interesting online Bright Lights Film
Journal
. And for a hint of nostalgia about what the Oscar ceremony used to be like go here and here .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.